Is Atwood’s Dystopia Coming True?

Handmaid's Tale

Can a novel cause one to panic prematurely? I’ve been wondering about this since teaching The Handmaid’s Tale at a time when we see the cultural battle against women’s reproductive rights picking up steam. How concerned should those of us be who believe that women should have control over their own reproductive choices, including whether or not to have an abortion? A number of my women students are very worried, and Atwood’s novel adds fuel to their fire.

In case you have missed it, Republican legislatures in North Dakota, Kansas, Alabama, Mississippi, and Arkansas seem to be competing about who can outdo the others. North Dakota’s new law limits forbids abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, Arkansas’s new law after 12. North Dakota has also passed a law limiting drug-induced abortions while Kansas, apparently paving the way for a series of measures in the future, has just declared that “life” begins at fertilization. Mississippi and Alabama have passed so-called TRAP laws (Targeted Restrictions against Abortion Providers) designed to make it impossible for abortion clinics to stay open, and Indiana, Virginia, Texas, and North Carolina are considering the same. Many of these laws will be overruled by court order as being unconstitutional, given that Roe v. Wade is still the law of the land. But that isn’t stopping legislatures from passing laws.

There are other disturbing signals as well. GOP candidate Rick Santorum, who finished second to Mitt Romney, attacked birth control itself, not just abortion, and some of the agitation against Obamacare has focused on the way it pays for contraception.  In another area, Congress almost failed to renew the once uncontroversial Violence against Women Act. In fact most House Republicans voted against it.

In Atwood’s dystopian novel, anti-abortion agitation eventually leads to the oppressive Republic of Gilead, which the author modeled on the mullahs’ clamp down on women’s freedom following the Iranian Revolution. In Handmaid’s Tale, the repressive forces are Christian, and some of their new laws are motivated by a plummeting birth rate, brought about a series of ecological disasters. Women who haven’t been observant fundamentalist Christians can be forced to become handmaids (Swift’s word in “Modest Proposal” is “breeders”), where they service couples where the woman is sterile.

Atwood’s narrator, who is one of these handmaids, has always been apolitical and notes that, when the first worrisome attacks on abortion doctors began, they always seemed to be someone else’s problem. Only in retrospect does she realize that these attacks were only the first step towards the current police state. Should we be worried ourselves?

There’s no question that we should remain vigilant, which is one of the purposes of Atwood’s book. But Atwood also notes that extraordinary circumstances need to have occurred for her dystopia to come into being. In more moderate times, extreme voices get pushed to the fringes. In America today, it is true that what were once fringe voices are now becoming prominent in some legislatures. But there is not yet a state without at least one abortion clinic (we’ll see what happens in North Dakota, Mississippi, and Alabama), and there is a powerful constituency pushing back against the state legislatures. After all, around 1.3 million American women choose to have abortions every year. And Roe v Wade is still the law of the land.

Proponents of women’s reproductive rights will need to keep speaking out and applying political pressure. But I think we’re a long way from Gilead at the moment.

This entry was posted in Atwood (Margaret) and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Sean

    Here are some questions for your female students regarding reproductive rights:

    If we theoretically get to the point where single women have 100% control of their reproductive rights (probably not possible, but assume so), specifically as it relates to the choice to continue a pregnancy, does it not follow that single women are 100% responsible for the consequences of a decision to continue, namely being 100% responsible for the child?

    And if your students agree, what do they think 100% responsibility for a child means? Does it mean abolishing child support from fathers? Does it mean discontinuing societal support for single moms? After all, 100% responsibility for the mother leaves 0% for the father and 0% for society.

    And what about married couples, should the spouse carrying the baby be 100% in control of the reproductive rights? Does her partner have any say?

  • Robin Bates

    I can’t entirely speak for my students, Sean, but my experience is that 100% rarely applies to anything in life. I find Roe v Wade to be wise in this regard–abortion is legal until the fetus is viable outside the womb, at which point the mother must assume full responsibility. “Viability outside the womb” is a compromise, which means it doesn’t satisfy many, but it might be the best that can be done in a difficult situation. I definitely think that fathers should have a say and imagine there are often long and heartfelt conversations between couples about whether to bring certain pregnancies to term. But if it ever comes down to who gets the final word, I’d have to lean in favor of the pregnant woman.

    In Handmaid’s Tale, women have 0% say. Except for those who choose to self abort, in which case they are executed.

  • Sean

    Agree, 100% rarely, if ever applies to anything. Excellent point on “final word”. Just substitute “final word” for 100% and I think the question and logic still follows:

    If we theoretically get to the point where single women have the final word regarding reproductive rights (probably not possible, but assume so), specifically as it relates to the choice to continue a pregnancy, does it not follow that single women are ultimately responsible for the consequences of a decision to continue, namely responsibility for the child?

    And if your students agree, what do they think ultimate responsibility for a child means? Does it mean abolishing child support from fathers? Does it mean discontinuing societal support for single moms? After all, final word for the mother ultimately leaves no word for the father and no word for society.

    And what about married couples, should the spouse carrying the baby have the final word regarding reproductive rights? Does her partner have any say?

    P.S. As for when society accords protections for the fetus, and thus starts to limit a woman’s reproductive rights, is a subject beyond my pay grade. “Viability” seems reasonable. But whatever that point in time is, women need to be comfortable with both the loss of rights after that time, and the loss of protections for the fetus before that time.

  • Pingback: Teaching Gender Sensitivity at West Point()


  • AVAILABLE NOW!

  • Literature is as vital to our lives as food and shelter. Stories and poems help us work through the challenges we face, from everyday irritations to loneliness, heartache, and death. Literature is meant to mix it up with life. This website explores how it does so.

    Please feel free to e-mail me [rrbates (at) smcm (dot) edu]. I would be honored to hear your thoughts and questions about literature.

  • Sign up for weekly newsletter

    Your email will not be shared or sold.
    * = required field

    powered by MailChimp!
  • Twitter Authentication data is incomplete