In Soccer, MAGA Rooted against Casey

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Monday

Despite rightwing accusations that the U.S. National Women’s Soccer Team (USNWT) lost in the World Cup’s round of 16 because they were too “woke,” yesterday’s final between the stalwart English and the incandescent Spanish made clear what really happened: the rest of the world has caught up. I don’t think anyone could have beaten La Roja this year, given its sublime passing and its ability to turn from defense to offense in a microsecond. But why let the improbability of an aging U.S. squad pulling off a three-peat get in the way of your political rage?

As basketball-great-turned Blogger Kareem Abdul-Jabbar puts it, it’s as though the American right was rooting for Casey to strike out:

The classic American poem “Casey at the Bat,” chronicling the hometown disappointment when their team hero strikes out, failing to win the big game, has been subverted by right-wing commentators and politicians giddy at the U.S. women’s soccer team losing in the World Cup round of 16. Shockingly, there finally is joy in Mudville—not because the mighty Casey got a hit, but because he struck out. The hometown fans wanted their team to lose. Crazy, I know.

Foremost among those rooting against the U.S. was, of course, Donald Trump, who took the occasion to taunt Megan Rapinoe—winner of both the Golden Boot and the Golden Goal in 2019—for missing a penalty shot in the shootout:

The ‘shocking and totally unexpected’ loss by the U.S. Women’s Soccer Team to Sweden is fully emblematic of what is happening to the our once great Nation under Crooked Joe Biden. Many of our players were openly hostile to America – No other country behaved in such a manner, or even close. WOKE EQUALS FAILURE. Nice shot Megan, the USA is going to Hell!!! MAGA.

Others followed:

“I’m thrilled they lost,” said former Fox News host Megyn Kelly. “You don’t support America, I don’t support you.”

So being critical of Trump is apparently not supporting America.

But let’s look at Jabbar’s “Casey” allusion. Although the U.S. team had a certain swagger, that’s just the way it is with great teams. If anyone really behaves like Casey, however, it’s Trump himself. Following the law is as beneath him as strikes are to Casey:

And now the leather-covered sphere came hurtling through the air,
And Casey stood a-watching it in haughty grandeur there.
Close by the sturdy batsman the ball unheeded sped—
“That ain’t my style,” said Casey. “Strike one!” the umpire said.

Actually, come to think of it, Casey’s crowds are not unlike Trump’s, with one critical difference:

From the benches, black with people, there went up a muffled roar,
Like the beating of the storm-waves on a stern and distant shore;
“Kill him! Kill the umpire!” shouted someone on the stand;
And it’s likely they’d have killed him had not Casey raised his hand.

The difference, of course, is that Trump would have riled up this crowd, not calmed it down. “If you see somebody with a tomato, knock the crap out of them,” he once told a crowd. What better way to avoid accountability than have the umpire removed?

“Casey at the Bat” is a classic case of hubris, of pride going before the fall. But in sports, losing eventually happens to everyone. And unlike Casey and the U.S. Women’s Soccer Team, Trump doesn’t have a record of accomplishment to justify his swagger.

To defend Casey further, even the greatest batters fail more often than they succeed. If, in the major leagues, you register an out no more than seven out of every 10 times, you can wind up as the batting champion. As for the USNWT, it’s those who mock a team that has won four of the nine world championships that come across looking small.

For “American carnage” Trump, it fits his narrative that America is turning into Mudville. You can bet that, on his watch, he’ll make sure that there are no bands playing somewhere, or men laughing or children shouting. And definitely no light hearts.

Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright,
The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light;
And somewhere men are laughing, and somewhere children shout,
But there is no joy in Mudville—mighty Casey has struck out.

Trump is where joy goes to die.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

A Moses Poem for a Lost Child

Philip Richards Morris, Infant Moses and Mother

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Sunday

This past May journalist Josie Glausius wrote about how she turned to poetry when her 12-year-old son was dying of a rare form of brain cancer. The poem that meant the most to her was one that alludes to one of next Sunday’s Old Testament readings, the one about infant Moses in the river.

Before turning to it, here are some other ways poetry served her. She reports that she read him poems her mother had read to her as a child, including Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 29” (“When, in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes”) and John Masefield’s “Cargoes.” She says her son listened “rapt and smiling,” after which they would talk about the meaning of the poems.

I love these choices. With the Shakespeare sonnet I can imagine her son feeling sorry for himself (“I all alone beweep my outcast state”) but then moving on to a more positive vision:

Haply I think on thee, and then my state,
(Like to the lark at break of day arising
From sullen earth) sings hymns at heaven’s gate;
   For thy sweet love remembered such wealth brings
   That then I scorn to change my state with kings.

The Masefield poem, meanwhile, would have helped him imagine his unknown journey as sailing to exotic lands with strange-sounding names. It would have appealed to his vision of adventure, which was also the reason why he liked Lewis Carroll’s “Jabberwocky,” which his mother recited to him in his final hours when he was lying unconscious. She explains what the poem had meant to him:

My son had learned the words to Lewis Carroll’s nonsense poem by listening to me recite it to him and his twin sister at bedtime. A brave, bright, imaginative, optimistic boy, he loved the drama of the poem and the courage of the “beamish boy” as, with his “vorpal sword” in hand, he defeats his “manxome foe.”

During the illness, Glausius started a poetry group on WhatsApp, which she called “Poetry Is Medicine.” As she had discovered during earlier crises, “the rhythm of poetry can soothe my anxieties. With just a word or a phrase, a poem can reach the hidden places that prayers or well-meaning advice cannot.”

Her friends in the group responded by sending her poems that reached deep:

One sent “Chinese Foot Chart,” by Kay Ryan: (“Look, / boats of mercy / embark from / our heart at the / oddest knock.”). Another carefully translated the Hebrew poem “Apple of Imperfection,” by Varda Genossar: “First speech is the speech of love … last speech, silence.”

After her son died, there were yet other poems. One friend sent her Raymond Carver’s “Late Fragment,” his last published poem:

And did you get what
you wanted from this life, even so?
I did.
And what did you want?
To call myself beloved, to feel myself
beloved on the earth.

The poem “offered me some small comfort,” Glausius wrote, “because I knew that even in my son’s darkest hours, he was always loved — and still is — and was never for a moment alone.”

Another friend sent her Calista Buchen’s “Taking Care”:

I sit with my grief. I mother it. I hold its small, hot hand. I don’t say, shhh. I don’t say, its okay.  I wait until it is done having feelings. Then we stand and we go wash the dishes. We crack  open bedroom  doors,  step over  the creaks, and kiss  the children.  We  are sore from  this grief,  like we’ve returned from a run, like we are training for a marathon. I’m with you all the way, says my grief, whispering,  and then we splash our face with water and stretch,  one big shadow and one small. 

And then there was Carl Sandburg’s “Theme in Yellow,” which she appreciated because the title “contains my son’s favorite, ‘cheerful’ color.” She particularly liked the passage,

When dusk is fallen
Children join hands
And circle round me
Singing ghost songs

But the poem that reached the deepest was about infant Moses. Here’s the relevant section from the Biblical story:

When she could hide him no longer she got a papyrus basket for him, and plastered it with bitumen and pitch; she put the child in it and placed it among the reeds on the bank of the river. His sister stood at a distance, to see what would happen to him.

The daughter of Pharaoh came down to bathe at the river, while her attendants walked beside the river. She saw the basket among the reeds and sent her maid to bring it. When she opened it, she saw the child. He was crying, and she took pity on him…

Glausius says she read Spanish poet Luis Alberto de Cuenca’s “Moses” (trans. Gustavo Pérez Firmat) by her son’s grave eight days after his death. Like some of the other poems that consoled her and her son in his final months, it imagines death as a journey. Along with the basket story, in also alludes to the parting of the Red Sea and other divine interventions:

Give me your hand. We have to cross
the river and my strength fails me.
Hold me as if I were an abandoned package
in a wicker basket, a lump that moves
and cries in the twilight. Cross the river
with me. Even if this time the waters
don’t part before us. Even if this time God
doesn’t come to our aid and a flurry of arrows
riddles our backs. Even if there is no river.

I love how we’re uncertain whom the poem addresses. When Glausius read the poem at the graveside service, was she asking for God’s help while imagining herself, like her son when he was a baby, as a “lump that moves and cries in the twilight.” The river in this case would be her son’s death, which she doesn’t want to turn away from–and which God has not forestalled by divine intervention.

Or did she see herself asking her son to give her strength, the parent-child relationship momentarily reversed? It could be that she’s asking him to help her stay upright at the moment when her strength fails her.

The power that lies in making such a request is that one feels less alone. One imagines that someone is listening and reaching out a hand.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Belarus Bans 19th Century Poet

Authoritarian leaders Putin and Lukashenko

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Friday

According to the BBC, Belarus’s authoritarian leader and Putin puppet Alexander Lukashenko has banned two 19th poems by one of the founders of the modern Belarusian literary tradition. According to Wikipedia, Vincent Dunin-Martsinkevich was a Polish-Belarusian writer, poet, poet, dramatist and social activist who helped establish the national school theatre. It appears that his extremism consists of drawing a contrast between Belarus and Russia. Lukashenko has also targeted works by 20th century Belarusian authors Larisa Geniyush, Vladimir Neklyayev, Lidiya Arobey and Natalya Arseneva.

Despite an intense google search, I have not been able to find copies of the two banned Dunin-Martsinkevich poems, “The Winds Are Floating” and “Conversation of an Elderly Man.” The poet sounds like other regional authors in the 19th century Russian empire, such as Ukraine’s Taras Shevchenko. (I write about Shevchenko here  and here.) By tapping into local folklore and writing great poetry in his own tongue, Dunin-Martsinkevich gave Belarusians confidence in their own national identity.

In this, Dunin-Martsinkevich served not only the interests of Belarusians but of Poles as well. He translated Poland’s great epic poem Pan Tadeusz, by its greatest poet Adam Mickiewicz, into Belarusian, the first translation of the poem into another Slavic language. One subplot of Pan Tedusz involves a spontaneous revolt of local inhabitants against an occupying Russian garrison. There’s also this famous invocation, which nationalist Lithuanians, Poles, and Belarusians thrilled to:

Lithuania, my country! You are as good health:
How much one should prize you, he only can tell
Who has lost you. Your beauty and splendor I view
And describe here today, for I long after you.

Holy Virgin who shelters our bright Częstochowa
And shines in Ostra Brama! You, who yet watch over
The castled Nowogródek’s folk faithful and mild;
As You once had returned me to health, a sick child,
(When by my weeping mother into Your care given,
I by miracle opened a dead eye to heaven,
And to Your temple’s threshold could straightaway falter
For a life thus returned to thank God at the altar)
Thus to motherland’s breast You will bring us again.

Meanwhile, bear my soul heavy with yearning’s dull pain,
To those soft woodland hillocks, those meadows, green, gleaming,
Spread wide along each side of the blue-flowing Niemen,
To those fields, which by various grain painted, there lie
Shimmering, with wheat gilded, and silvered with rye…

To understand the poem’s power, imagine how “America the Beautiful” would sound to our ears if the United States were dominated by a foreign power.

Both Dunin-Martsinkevich and Adam Mickiewicz came under fire from Russian authorities. Mickiewicz fled to France while Dunin-Martsinkevich was arrested for his role in Poland’s 1863 January uprising. Although he was eventually set free, his daughter Kamila Marcinkievič was sentenced to a psychiatric hospital for her participation.

Once can see why Dunin-Martsinkevich would take on a new urgency in present day Belarus. Lukashenko relies on Vladimir Putin to stay in power but is facing new nationalist pressures as Belarusians see what Russia is doing to Ukraine, with whom they can relate.

It doesn’t matter that Dunin-Martsinkevich’s works were composed over 150 years ago. Poetry, no matter how old, can speak with power to the present moment. Keep this in mind as Florida school systems ban classic works by Toni Morrison, Khaled Hosseini, James Baldwin, Margaret Atwood, Kurt Vonnegut, Arundhati Roy, Kazuo Ishiguro, Sandra Cisneros, Isabel Allende, and hundreds of others. And as they censor Shakespeare as well.

 This is what authoritarians do.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Bluest Eye and Ohio’s Abortion Politics

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Thursday

When Ohio’s fetal heartbeat law went into effect upon the U.S. Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v Wade, a ten-year-old rape victim was forced to go to neighboring Indiana for an abortion (!). While I took note of the story at the time, I missed making a connection with Ohio’s greatest author. Toni Morrison’s first novel, The Bluest Eye, is about an 11-year-old is also impregnated, in her case by her father.

Like the Ohio child, Pecola Breedlove does not have abortion as an option, the story having been set in the 1930s. Instead, the baby comes prematurely and dies while Pecola herself goes mad. Her fostering sister Claudia reports,

The damage done was total. She spent her days, her tendril, sap-green days, walking up and down, up and down, her head jerking to the beat of a drummer so distant only she could hear. Elbows bent, hands on shoulders, she flailed her arms like a bird in an eternal, grotesquely futile effort to fly. Beating the air, a winged but grounded bird, intent on the blue void it could not reach—could not even see—but which filled the valleys of the mind.

Initially ostracized because she is unattractive, Pecola thinks that having blue eyes like Shirley Temple would make people love her. After the rape has driven her mad, she even thinks that her eyes have in fact turned blue, with the fantasy becoming a kind of refuge. But for Claudia, her plight is a condemnation of society, which has long scapegoated her so that it could feel better about itself:

All of us—all who knew her—felt so wholesome after we cleaned ourselves on her. We were so beautiful when we stood astride her ugliness. Her simplicity decorates us, her guilt sanctified us, her pain made us glow with health, her awkwardness made us think we had a sense of humor. Her inarticulateness made us believe we were eloquent. Her poverty kept us generous. Even her waking dreams we used—to silence our own nightmares. And she let us, there thereby deserved our contempt. We honed our egos on her, padded our characters with her frailty, and yawned in the fantasy of our strength.

So how do forced-birth advocates feel when presented with a Pecola situation?  Well, we know that many of them initially claimed that the Ohio story was a hoax, although they went silent when the rapist was caught and, last month, found guilty and sentenced.

Once it was clear that the story was not a hoax, they then moved to a second rationalization John Stoehr of The Editorial Board, who has studied the mindset of Calvinist fundamentalists, explains that they write off such hard cases as God’s will:

The teachings of Jesus – “turn the other cheek” – subvert the self-interests of conservatives, who must divide the world between those who are “saved” and those who are damned. They must cling to punishment because punishment explains and rationalizes the surrounding reality. 

Why are there poor people in America? Why do Black people suffer most? Why do so many hard-working people struggle to make ends meet? They must have done something to deserve their lot in life. And because they deserve it, there’s nothing to be done. It’s God’s will.

Stoehr also notes that seeing the world this way serves to preserve privilege, which is why many forced-birth advocates also oppose contraception.  Preventing women from making their own reproductive choices is a way of controlling them. If the Pecola Breedloves of the world pay the price for their power grab—well, that’s for God to sort out.

By giving us three-dimensional depictions of people whom society otherwise stereotypes or ignores, novels function as an implicit rebuke to such thinking. Maybe that’s one reason why Bluest Eye is being banned in schools across the country. The same people that think it’s okay for a 10-year-old to have a baby don’t want high school students to read about it happening. This too is about control.

The good news is that Ohio voters may well, in November, enshrine abortion rights in the state’s constitution, wresting control back from the rightwing state legislature. Even in red states, the forces of reaction don’t always win.

Another case – Historian Heather Cox Richardson has just alerted me to another recent case, about a

13-year-old Mississippi girl who just gave birth after being raped by a stranger in her yard. She was unable to obtain an abortion because of Mississippi’s abortion ban. She is scheduled soon to start seventh grade.

Meanwhile, rightwing judges are going after the abortion drug mifepristone, approved in 2000 by the Food and Drug Administration. If they can’t ban it, they want to at least severely restrict its use “by saying it could not be sent through the mail or prescribed without an in-person visit to a doctor, cutting midwives and other healthcare providers out of the process.”

A Trump judge, seeking to ban mifepristone altogether, said that doctors suffer moral and aesthetic injury when they have to participate in any way with an abortion. In his minority opinion he quoted a doctor who wrote that he is harmed when he “lose[s] the opportunity…to care for the woman and child through pregnancy and bring about a successful delivery of new life.” 

As abortion centers are shuttered, we are going to have more and more Pecola Breedloves.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Fani Willis’s Big Baggy Monster

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Wednesday

As I’ve been reading about the racketeering charges brought against the Trump “enterprise” by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, I’ve been struck by how important a novelistic sensibility is to the prosecution.

It’s not just that it needs to tell a good story. After all, prosecutors and defenders alike need compelling narratives to convince a jury. It’s that, with 19 indicted defendants, not to mention another 30 un-indicted and unnamed co-conspirators, how does the prosecution keep the story from spiraling out of control?

I think of what Henry James and his acolyte, the literary scholar Percy Lubbock, said of such stories.  James labeled many 19th century novels by authors like Dickens, Dostoevsky, and Tolstoy as “large, loose, baggy monsters”—a phrase which has evolved over the years into “big baggy monsters”—and wasn’t sure that he liked them. His own preference was for the tightly crafted fiction of Gustave Flaubert, which he emulated.

At a time when scholars weren’t sure that novels were literature, James and Lubbock argued that tightly written novels resembled poetry more than their sprawling counterparts. By this criteria, the most controlled of Dickens’s novels (Hard Times) was regarded as the most artistic.

Few literary scholars still think this way, and I myself prefer the big baggy monsters. Rather than regarding them as chaotic, we find underlying patterns.

I take this brief dip into the history of literary criticism because I think one can use the two categories—tightly constructed novels and big baggy monsters—to characterize the two indictments of Donald Trump. Jack Smith has put together a Jamesian indictment whereas Willis’s indictment is Dickensian or Tolstoyan.

It remains to be seen which is a better approach. Smith’s is built for speed, which is what we need right now since, if Trump is found guilty, people need to know before the conclusion of the Republican primary season. Willis’s complicated case may well stretch out until after the November 2024 presidential election.

But Fani Willis’s big baggy monster, like Bleak House and Anna Karenina, has a coherent throughline, which is that Trump headed an enterprise that was willing to break laws to keep him in power. Even though the 19 co-defendants didn’t sit down in a room and plot election overthrow, they were all on the same wavelength, determined to do whatever was necessary to keep Trump in power.

Thus, at one point in this novelistic story there is Trump and those close to him pressuring the Georgia secretary of state to find the necessary votes. There is Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump, Jr. pressuring Georgia Republican legislators to stay loyal to Trump. Some Georgia Republicans forge documents to become fake electors, others try to steal data from voting machines. And in the most heart-rending story of them all—one which lies at the very heart of this novel—some Trumpists pressure two election workers, a mother and a daughter, to confess to non-existent voter fraud.

After getting threatened by certain of the defendants and then vilified publicly by others—so much so that they require bodyguards and have to move—Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss say that their lives will never be the same and that nowhere do they feel safe.

There is something Dickensian or Tolstoyan about their plight, and the Georgia indictment makes for a more emotional reading experience than the stark drama of election theft laid out by Jack Smith. But just as we need both kinds of novels, so do we need both kinds of indictments. Smith’s may be first across the line—like a Flaubert novel, it’s short and to the point—but Willis’s provides more variety and gives a fuller picture.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

“Beowulf” on Why Demagogues Arise

Dragon in Beowulf film (2007)

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Tuesday

A recent study about how social discontent contributes to the rise of populist demagogues confirms what Beowulf long ago had to say about public anger’s destructive consequences. Where modern social science talks about resentment, sadness, stress, worry and dismay, however, the Beowulf poet expresses the same feelings through two trolls and a dragon.

I owe my awareness of the new study to Washington Post columnist Charles Lane. In an article entitled “Populism thrives because people are mad, and also because they’re sad,” Lane writes about three social scientists who took on the question of whether anger drives populism. Their conclusion, he reports, is partially yes but that anger is not the only emotion involved:

Anger alone cannot account for recent U.S. vote shifts in favor of populist candidates (of both the left and right). Rather, the trends reflect a wider mix of negative emotions such as sadness, stress and worry.

The report, which studied Gallup polls from 2008-17, showed that “a county’s average anger level correlated positively with higher vote shares for Trump and for socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in the 2016 GOP and Democratic primaries, respectively.”

According to Lane, the authors contend that (in their words) “anger no longer operates as a separate channel in driving the populist vote share.” Instead, “a more complex sense of malaise and gloom, rather than anger per se, drives the rise in populism.”

Lane concludes that “voters who propelled Trump to the White House seven years ago did so more in sorrow than in anger.”

Beowulf shows us, however, that it’s not either/or because anger and sorrow are integrally related. Resentful anger is embodied in the figure of Grendel, grieving anger in the figure of his mother. The dragon, meanwhile, is a figure of “malaise and gloom” and is yet a third form that anger can take. Whereas the sorrowing anger of Grendel’s mother blows hot, the depressed anger of the dragon blows cold. She is boiling rage, the dragon is frozen rage.

Nor do the resemblances end there. Just as Grendel’s mother can retreat into her cave after blowing up, so the hunkered-down dragon can come charging out of its own place of seclusion when it feels its prerogatives have been impinged upon. When it does so, it burns down everything around it. In short, think of the three monsters as the anger gang, with each posing a major threat to society.

I wrote my book How Beowulf Can Save America: An Epic Hero’s Guide to Defeating the Politics of Rage in 2008 when Barack Obama was running for reelection after having been “shellacked” (his word) by Tea Party populism two years before. At the time, Beowulf helped me diagnose the different forms of anger at play: there was certainly economic and racial resentment at work, but we also saw grief for a cherished image of America that some felt was being lost. Sometimes this grief manifested itself in troll violence, sometimes in dragon depression.

What I didn’t anticipate in 2008 was that a demagogue would one day turn enough of the American public into trolls and energized dragons to win an election. I also failed to fully appreciate the racial component of the various angers, and I was overly optimistic about Obama’s Beowulfian response.

For instance, I saw Obama standing strong and calm in the face of Grendelian resentment. I saw him successfully wielding the giant sword with which Beowulf kills the sorrowing rage of Grendel’s mother, that sword being the American principles found in The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution. And I saw him fighting off America’s dragon depression by galvanizing people to work collectively (as Beowulf works with Wiglaf) for the greater good.

I still see all these approaches as necessary. Unfortunately, since the monsters seem to have grown in power and subsumed a significant section of the population, the task of defeating them appears harder than I once thought it was.

So I disagree with Lane when he says that Trump was the beneficiary of sorrow more than anger, which almost makes the monsters seem noble. Anger can transform resentment, sorrow and malaise into lethal behavior, giving us hideous beasts who are capable of slaughtering shoppers, worshippers and school children; storming the Capitol; or giving a demagogue carte blanche to do whatever he wants.

Unless a riled-up public chooses to be Beowulf strong rather than indulging in dark rage, they will do damage to others, to themselves, and to this country we love.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

New Monument Protected against Witchery

Ancestral Footprints National Monument

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Monday

Last week President Joe Biden officially designated almost a million acres of land north and south of the Grand Canyon as the Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni [Our Ancestral Footprints] National Monument. In doing so, he closed the land off to new uranium mining, which put me in mind of Leslie Marmon Silko’s Ceremony. Uranium plays a significant thematic role in the novel by the Laguna Pueblo author, and the move to ban further mining is in line with Silko’s desire to push back against what she calls “the witchery.”

First, a note about uranium mining in the area. According to science reporter Justine Calma of The Verge (blogger Heather Cox Richardson alerted me to her article), past uranium mining left 500 abandoned mines on Navajo Nation land, and pollution from those mines has been linked to life-threatening illnesses among children there. Nevertheless and predictably, Republicans are objecting to prohibiting further uranium mining. (The present uranium mines are grandfathered in.)

Richardson notes that the move is part of a larger promise Biden made about protecting 30% of all the nation’s lands and waters by 2030. To date, Richardson reports, the Biden administration has protected

9 million acres in Alaska, 225,000 acres in Minnesota, 50,000 acres in Colorado, 500,000 acres in Nevada, and 6,600 acres in Texas. It has restored protections for three national monuments the previous administration had gutted: Grand Staircase–Escalante and Bears Ears in Utah and Northeast Canyons and Seamounts off the New England coast. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland is working on creating a maritime sanctuary by protecting 770,000 square miles in the Pacific Ocean southwest of Hawaii. 

And then there’s this:

The administration is also, [Biden] said, honoring his commitment “to prioritize respect for the Tribal sovereignty and self-determination, to honor the solemn promises the United States made to Tribal nations to fulfill federal trust and treaty obligations.” The protected land is home to 3,000 cliff houses, cave paintings, and other Indigenous cultural sites. Biden explained that the land being protected and the land already protected as the Grand Canyon National Monument had been Indigenous homelands. 

Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, meanwhile, has included funding to clean up such industrial pollution in the region, including the abandoned oil wells that leak toxic gases into the air and hazardous chemicals into the water.

Ceremony is a novel about an Indian war veteran who returns from World War II, having survived the Bataan Death march in which thousands of Filipino and American prisoners died. Tayo is suffering from PTSD but that’s not his only problem. In addition to survivor guilt and various family and tribal issues, he returns to a land in which White America is destroying the land and undermining the Indians’ connection with it. At one point, the destruction is articulated as a story poem. About the Whites, Silko writes,

 Then they grow away from the earth
 then they grow away from the sun
 then they grow away from the plants and animals.
 They see no life
 When they look
 they see only objects.
 The world is a dead thing for them
 the trees and rivers are not alive
 the mountains and stones are not alive
 The deer and bear are objects
 They see no life

They fear
 They fear the world.
 They destroy what they fear.
 They fear themselves.

This is not the worst of it, however. The culmination of this destruction is nuclear annihilation of everyone:

They will take this world from ocean to ocean
they will turn on each other
they will destroy each other
Up here
in these hills
they will find the rocks,
rocks with veins of green and yellow and black.
They will lay the final pattern with these rocks
they will lay it across the world
and explode everything

Seeking to find shelter at an abandoned uranium mine as former Indian companions seek to kill him (it’s not only Whites who are murderous), Tayo comes across some of these rocks:

He knelt and found an ore rock. The gray stone was streaked with powdery yellow uranium, bright and alive as pollen; veins of sooty black formed lines with the yellow, making mountain ranges and river across the stone. But they had taken these beautiful rocks from deep within earth and they had laid them in a monstrous design, realizing destruction on a scale only they [the witches] could have dreamed.

Tayo’s grandmother has witnessed the explosion of Trinity, which occurred three hundred miles to the southwest. Uranium mining on Indian land, which eventually leads to the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, gives Tayo a way of connecting the local with the global. Suddenly he sees all humankind united against a common enemy:

[T]he lines of cultures and worlds were drawn in flat dark lines on fine light sand, converging in the middle of witchery’s final ceremonial sand painting. From that time on, human beings were one clan again, united by the fate the destroyers planned for all of them, for all living things; united by a circle of death that devoured people in cities twelve thousand miles away, victims who had never known these mesas, who had never seen the delicate colors of the rocks which boiled up their slaughter.

The final showdown occurs at the uranium mine. Deprived of their victim, Tayo’s former companions turn on each other in a bloody ritual. Tayo resists yielding to his own anger and, in so doing, emerges with a sense of the healing the world needs. Silko writes,

Big clouds covered the moon, but he could still see the stars. He had arrived at a convergence of patterns; he could see them clearly now. The stars had always been with them, existing beyond memory, and they were all held together there. The stars had always been with them, existing beyond memory, and they were all held together there. Under these same stars the people had come down from White House in the north. They had seen mountains shifts and rivers change course and even disappear, back into the earth; but always there were these stars.

So the world will keep going although Silko then adds a cautionary note:

The only thing is: it has never been easy.

Honoring tribal lands and addressing the pollution left over from uranium mines and oil wells is one way of pushing back against the witchery. So is taking strides against global warming and climate change. As the world teeters between darkness and light, we must start by tapping into our inner light and then doing the best we can.

Silko shows us the way. To his credit, President Biden is doing what he can to make sure we take the necessary steps.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

On Leonard Cohen’s Suzanne

Suzanne Verdal, Leonard Cohen’s muse for “Suzanne”

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Sunday

As today’s Gospel reading is the account of Jesus walking on the water and as I recently watched the Netflix documentary on Leonard Cohen, I devote today’s post to “Suzanne,” which mentions the Biblical episode. The documentary, because it was focused on “Hallelujah,” didn’t have much to say about “Suzanne,” but it taught me a lot about Cohen’s intense spiritual searching.

Although Jewish, Cohen at one point spent five years in a Buddhist monastery. When he left, he discovered the experience had strengthened his Jewish identity, although stories from the Hebrew Bible had always appeared in his songs. He has also identified at times with the Jewish prophet Jesus.

“Suzanne” opens with his Platonic relationship with Suzanne. The night spent beside her, apparently, involves watching the boats go by:

Suzanne takes you down to her place near the river
You can hear the boats go by, you can spend the night beside her
And you know that she’s half-crazy but that’s why you want to be there
And she feeds you tea and oranges that come all the way from China
And just when you mean to tell her that you have no love to give her
Then she gets you on her wavelength
And she lets the river answer that you’ve always been her lover

And you want to travel with her, and you want to travel blind
And then you know that she will trust you
For you’ve touched her perfect body with your mind

Suzanne is not only physically beautiful but beautiful as a person, and her presence has pulled the speaker away from the emptiness of consumer/ materialist society. The relationship is also spiritual rather than sexual, which is why I suppose he assures her that she can trust him. Adopting her perspective, he comes to see simple things like tea and oranges in a new light—they are exotic, not commonplace.

At this point in his life, the poet feels himself incapable of love—“you have no love to give her”—but Suzanne communicates, through the sound of the river they are watching together, that he has this capacity for love after all. The “her” in “her lover” could be either Suzanne or the river or, best of all, both. He can connect with this spiritual current that runs through the universe if he abandons the urge to possess and control. The only way to travel is to abandon preconceptions and travel blind.

Unfortunately, the connection fades. The next section of the poem has him retreating once more into himself and his weariness. To  capture the spiritual fatigue, he thinks of Jesus, whom he imagines as similarly weary. Before examining what he is up to, let’s review Biblical passage (Matthew 14:22-33) since Cohen follows it somewhat closely:

Jesus made the disciples get into the boat and go on ahead to the other side, while he dismissed the crowds. And after he had dismissed the crowds, he went up the mountain by himself to pray. When evening came, he was there alone, but by this time the boat, battered by the waves, was far from the land, for the wind was against them. And early in the morning he came walking toward them on the sea. But when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were terrified, saying, “It is a ghost!” And they cried out in fear. But immediately Jesus spoke to them and said, “Take heart, it is I; do not be afraid.”

Peter answered him, “Lord, if it is you, command me to come to you on the water.” He said, “Come.” So Peter got out of the boat, started walking on the water, and came toward Jesus. But when he noticed the strong wind, he became frightened, and beginning to sink, he cried out, “Lord, save me!” Jesus immediately reached out his hand and caught him, saying to him, “You of little faith, why did you doubt?” When they got into the boat, the wind ceased. And those in the boat worshiped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God.”

For Cohen, a worn-out Jesus has retreated, not to the mountain, but to his “lonely wooden tower,” a symbol of the self. His message of love is not getting through and he becomes discouraged.

People, however, do pay attention to that message when they are dying—when Peter is sinking—so Jesus gifts the world with his death. But before the resurrection sky opens, there is the crucifixion, and Jesus appears broken. The disciples forsake him and one can think of the moments before the crucifixion where he appears “almost human”–for instance, when he asks God to “take this cup from me” at Gethsemane and his cry from the cross, “Why have you forsaken me?”

And Jesus was a sailor
When He walked upon the water
And He spent a long time watching
From His lonely wooden tower

And when He knew for certain
Only drowning men could see Him
He said, “All men will be sailors then
Until the sea shall free them”

But He Himself was broken
Long before the sky would open
Forsaken, almost human
He sank beneath your wisdom like a stone

And you want to travel with Him
And you want to travel blind
And you think maybe you’ll trust Him
For He’s touched your perfect body with his mind

I’m reading “wisdom” here as matter-of-fact conventional wisdom, which can’t see beyond the material. But because Jesus has touched “your perfect body”—He sees the beauty in us more than we see it in ourselves—we think maybe we’ll trust Him. (I love the tentativeness of “you think maybe.”) If the speaker surrenders to Him–if he travels blind–he will be restored.

Having seen the significance of his encounter with Suzanne spelled out in religious terms, we return to Suzanne, a Madonna of the harbor clothed in Salvation Army rags and feathers. Under her tutelage—like the disciplines under Jesus—the speaker finds those people who have been rejected and forgotten. These “children of the morning” are “leaning out of love/And they will lean that way forever,” and Cohen recognizes himself in them (“While Suzanne holds the mirror”).

Whereas earlier Cohen assured Suzanne that she could trust him, now he knows that he can trust her and her spiritual mind. He has new confidence that he will touch base with the divine. Here’s how the song ends:

Now, Suzanne takes your hand
And she leads you to the river
She is wearing rags and feathers
From the Salvation Army counters

And the sun pours down like honey
On our lady of the harbor
And she shows you where to look
Among the garbage and the flowers

There are heroes in the seaweed
There are children in the morning
They are leaning out for love
And they will lean that way forever
While Suzanne holds the mirror

And you want to travel with her
And you want to travel blind
And you know that you can trust her
For she’s touched your perfect body with her mind

We all have it within us to embark on such a journey.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

When Bicycling, Marvels Coast By

Federico Zandomeneghi, Meeting on a Bicycle (1895)

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Friday

I’ve spent the last two weeks in Madison with my brother Sam. While he goes off to his job at Quince and Apple (specializing in gourmet jams and preserves), I’ve been bicycling around the city, which is a Mecca for cyclists.

Madison has special bike paths (including some with tunnels that go under major thoroughfares), special bicycle traffic lights and crossings electric bikes that one can rent, “sharrow” markings on certain streets to remind motorists they are to share the road, and signs directed specifically to bikers (“one way—except for bikes”). I’ve seen parents with one and sometimes two children either sitting behind them or pulled in a cart, as well as families of cyclists where everyone has his or her own bike. My brother tells me that Madison also has hardcore cyclists who will commute to work even in sub-zero temperatures, withspecial fat tires that can handle ice and snow.

More sobering, occasionally I’ve seen “ghost bicycles,” painted white and decaying at intersections where cyclists have died after colliding with cars. There’s one of these bicycles on Baldwin and Wilson, a few blocks from my brother’s house on East Mifflin.

While here, I’ve taken one thirteen-mile ride around Lake Monona, the southernmost of the Madison lakes, and another extended trip to the zoo, which is next to the apartment where my family lived for the first month of my life. (My father was a Wisconsin graduate student at the time.) The vistas are breathtaking.

So here’s a William Stafford poem celebrating a bike ride. Although it takes place in a colder season, it captures what it feels like to be riding alone in nature and appreciating the “marvels” thatcoast by.” At such moments we become aware of “the splendor of our life.”

When Stafford addresses us as “citizens of our great amnesty,” he is talking about how we have been granted temporary amnesty from death. After all, “we live”:

Maybe Alone on My Bike
By William Stafford

I listen, and the mountain lakes
hear snowflakes come on those winter wings
only the owls are awake to see,
their radar gaze and furred ears
alert. In that stillness a meaning shakes;

And I have thought (maybe alone
on my bike, quaintly on a cold
evening pedaling home), Think!–
the splendor of our life, its current unknown
as those mountains, the scene no one sees.

O citizens of our great amnesty:
we might have died. We live. Marvels
coast by, great veers and swoops of air
so bright the lamps waver in tears,
and I hear in the chain a chuckle I like to hear.

I’m intrigued by how, after being brought to tears by the beauty of life, the poet hears “in the chain a chuckle.” Could this be, I wonder, an allusion to T.S. Eliot’s Waste Land:“But at my back in a cold blast I hear/ The rattle of the bones, and chuckle spread from ear to ear.” Eliot’s line, in turn, is a riff off Andrew Marvell’s carpé diem poem “To His Coy Mistress”:

      But at my back I always hear
Time’s wingèd chariot hurrying near;
And yonder all before us lie
Deserts of vast eternity.

I think that Stafford, in a poem that talks of life as a great amnesty, is telling us (like Marvell) to savor the moments we have been granted. The chuckle of the chain is a reminder that the bike can break down. Even as, in our joy, we veer and swoop, our vehicle lets us know that it won’t last forever.

But rather than the chuckle (or rattle) detracting from the moment, the poet likes to hear it, believing that it enhances the experience. Nothing like a little rattle to focus the mind since, with our senses sharpened, we can hear what only the mountain lakes can hear and see what only the owls can see.

In the stillness of new falling snow, the poet tells us, “a meaning shakes.” Maybe we are not alone as we sense a scene that no one sees.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments closed