Vigilante Films Responsible for Trayvon?

Bronson in "Death Wish"

Film Friday

After 40 days, George Zimmerman has finally been arrested for killing Trayvon Martin (no thanks to the local authorities), and the incident has people rethinking the vigilante film. This popular genre looks different when a self-proclaimed neighborhood watch guard shoots an innocent teenager because of the color of his skin.

In a Washington Post article, Ann Hornaday notes that the genre has been around at least since D. W. Griffith’s Birth of a Nation (1915), a less than auspicious beginning. There has always been a vigilante strain in the western, but the genre really came into its own in the 1970’s, probably as a response to the rise in urban crime and declining economic conditions after three decades of growth (the two are related). Clint Eastwood’s Dirty Harry films and Charles Bronson’s Death Wish films are the best known. Of course the caped crusader comic book films are also vigilante movies.

Since the Trayvon Martin case involved a gated community, these are also under scrutiny. Another Washington Post article notes how such communities contribute to an us-against-the-world mentality that plays into the vigilante myth. Edward Blakeley points out that, other than reducing auto theft, gated communities do not lower crime. Instead, they eat away at the ideal of civil society:

[In] these controlled spaces, an “us vs. them” mentality festers: Leaders of gated communities need to show that there is value to their rules by creating an external enemy — those people outside the walls.

Not only do the gates breed fear, they also shrink the notion of civic engagement and allow residents to retreat from civic responsibility. Residents of these communities may ask: Why do we need to pass the bond issue for more police? We have police. Why should we pay for the new park downtown? We have a park.

Blakeley goes on to ask,

How can we have a city where some neighborhoods can choose whom to admit? How can we have a social contract when we can reduce or eliminate social contact? How can a democracy function if some of its members develop a private space that operates in isolation?

The vigilante movie operates from a place where people have given up on civil society, or at least are venting their frustrations at how we fall short of the ideal. Hornaday notes,

When we celebrate the vigilante on our screens, we tell ourselves it’s because of our healthy mistrust of corrupt structures, or because we’re genuinely vulnerable — not because of our more shameful tendency to sterotype others based on fear or hatred.

The best vigilante films, rather than just preying on our fears, make this paranoia the subject of the film. John Ford’s The Searchers shows the John Wayne character to be a crazed racist, and in Martin Scorcese’s Taxi Driver it is only a twist of fate that causes Travis Bickle (Robert DeNiro) to liberate a child prostitute (Jodi Foster) rather than kill a politician. Clint Eastwood’s Gran Torino, meanwhile, I view as an apology for (or at least revision of) his Dirty Harry films. (See my post on it here.) In it the racist protagonist bonds with the Laotian immigrants who have moved into his community, but when he turns to vigilante action to protect them, it only leads to an innocent girl getting hurt. It takes his Christ-like sacrifice, an action designed to bring in the established authorities, to cleanse his community of violence. In Dirty Harry, these same authorities were mocked.

We may think that attending a vigilante film is a harmless way to express our frustrations with government. Increasingly, however, Americans are failing to distinguish between their paranoid fantasies and the facts on the ground. Sometimes the paranoia enters legislation, such as the Stand Your Ground law which allows you to claim self defense if you shoot someone you feel threatened by. (Whether or not you have actually been threatened can be irrelevant.) Zimmerman may yet be freed based on that law.

The shooting of Trayvon Martin, in other words, occurred in a dangerous new context. Zimmerman may well have been shaped by both the paranoia of his society and a genre that voices that paranoia. If filmmakers have any integrity, they will start making their vigilante films something more than unquestioning vehicles for venting.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Sean

    Regarding gated communities, an analogy may be drawn with small rural towns (<200 people), where the gate is simply the miles of farmland isolating if from the rest of the world. Towns where the only reason to visit is to see someone you know. Police are non existent, the duties are performed by a county sheriff, who maybe visit the town once a week. Parks are maintained by the people of the town and fundraisers are thrown to purchase a new swing.

    But it seems the analogy breaks down to say that the leaders of these small towns promote an "us vs. them" mentality, or create external enemies to show there is value to their rules.

    So what makes a physical gate so different from miles of farmland? Maybe nothing. Maybe it's those people outside the rural towns, in the cities, who are creating the "us vs. them" mentality? A little jealousy, perhaps, that the social contract is so strong in these small rural towns?

  • Robin Bates

    When you mention small rural towns, Sean, the first image that comes to my mind is those 1950’s sci-films which are suddenly invaded by an alien threat. Perhaps the most famous is Invasion of the Body Snatchers(1956) but there were a whole mess of them. Often the invading creatures (say, the creature from the black lagoon) starts on the periphery. Someone who no one cares about gets killed, no one takes the problem seriously seriously, and then it works its way up the social scale until it is finally defeated. The genre has been read as a reflection of the radical transformations that were occurring in the 1950’s.

    I’ve lived in small towns most of my life (Sewanee, Tennessee; Braham, Minnesota; Pine City, Minnesota; and now St. Mary’s City, MD [although St. Mary’s is a college and an archaeological dig than a town) so I desperately want to buy into the idyllic vision. But I must admit that I’m seeing some of the the growing intolerance of the country at large leech into the small towns. Not that this is entirely new. I’m discovering racism in Sewanee and Minnesota when I was there many years ago. Sometimes it seems to be national news affecting people and sometimes (as in rural Iowa, where my wife is from) growing Latino/Latina populations, moving there to work in the meat-packing plants, are upsetting some people. That being said, the small town ideal (think It’s a Wonderful Life is so vital that we’ve got to figure out ways to hold on to it.


  • Literature is as vital to our lives as food and shelter. Stories and poems help us work through the challenges we face, from everyday irritations to loneliness, heartache, and death. Literature is meant to mix it up with life. This website explores how it does so.

    Please feel free to e-mail me [rrbates (at) smcm (dot) edu]. I would be honored to hear your thoughts and questions about literature.

  • Sign up for weekly newsletter

    Your email will not be shared or sold.
    * = required field

    powered by MailChimp!
  • Twitter Authentication data is incomplete