Trump as Putin’s Luca Brasi

Brando, Montana as Don Corleone, Luca Brasi

 Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Monday

If you want to understand how apparatchiks in George Orwell’s 1984 operate, look no further than South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham. How is it that one can be singing the praises of Eurasia one week and attacking them as evil incarnate the next? Well, check out Graham’s response to Zelensky after Donald Trump and J.D. Vance ambushed him this past weekend.

First, however, the passage in 1984:

[T]o trace out the history of the whole period, to say who was fighting whom at any given moment, would have been utterly impossible, since no written record, and no spoken word, ever made mention of any other alignment than the existing one. At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania was at war with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia. In no public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three powers had at any time been grouped along different lines. Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge which he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible.

Now to Graham, who in 2022 was calling Zelensky “the Winston Churchill of our time.” As recently as two weeks ago, he said that Zelensky “is the ally I’ve waited for my whole life.” Then, after the White House meeting,” he accused the Ukrainian president of disrespect and said, “I don’t know if we could ever do business with Zelensky again… He either needs to resign and send somebody over that we can do business with or he needs to change.”

What changed? After decades of being at odds with Eurasia, now we have a president who embraces it, with the result that his cultish followers fall in line. Graham believes whatever it’s in his interest to believe.

My theory of what happened in the White House meeting is that Putin, nervous about the deal for Ukrainian metals that Trump and Zelensky were about to sign, flexed his influence over the president and his vice-president. In response, they found a way to blow up the meeting in the most public way possible and to kick Zelensky out of the White House. Longtime foreign policy experts report they’ve never seen such a thing.

David Rothkopf of the Daily Beast notes that Trump imagines himself as Don Corleone in The Godfather, pressing “for a deal to squeeze mineral assets out of Ukraine in exchange for some ill-defined level of continued support for that country that could only be described as extortionate.” But Rothkopf says that it is actually Putin who is Don Corleone. Trump is just Luca Brasi, his enforcer:

[W]hile some on the right may be quietly cheering this new era of mafia-inspired testosterone-poisoned non-diplomacy, it would be a mistake to think of the Don in the White House as the Don Corleone of U.S. foreign policy. Considering where he gets his ideas and talking points and whose interests he serves, Trump is more the Luca Brasi of Putin foreign policy. Moronic muscle. An ignoramus with nukes.

And:

Trump is a paper tough guy. That was never more clear than on this infamous last Friday in February, when Trump revealed his decision to ally the United States with the most nefarious global criminal of our generation, Vladimir Putin, and to declare himself a lieutenant to the monstrous criminal enterprise on which Putin has focused throughout his two decades of dictatorship in Russia.

The comparison with Brasi doesn’t entirely work since the godfather’s henchman is a cold-blooded and very accomplished killer whereas Trump is just, well, “paper tough.” But one scene, which appears both in the book and in the movie, suggests that Rothkopf has gotten the parallel exactly right.

Brasi, despite his swagger, is so awed by the godfather, just as Trump is awed by Putin, that he falls all over himself to win his approval. At the wedding of the godfather’s daughter, he sucks up to Corleone by begging to be able to present the newlyweds with a large monetary gift. As you read the passage, imagine Brasi as Trump and Don Corleone as Putin:

Luca Brasi did not fear the police, he did not fear society, he did not fear God, he did not fear hell, he did not fear or love his fellow man. But he had elected, he had chosen, to fear and love Don Corleone. Ushered into the presence of the Don, the terrible Brasi held himself stiff with respect. He stuttered over the flowery congratulations he offered and his formal hope that the first grandchild would be masculine. He then handed the Don an envelope stuffed with cash as a gift for the bridal couple.

Trump’s own gift to godfather Putin is America’s leadership in the world. To which Putin responds (as does the godfather) with patronizing superiority:

The Don received Brasi as a king greets a subject who has done him an enormous service, never familiar but with regal respect.

Brasi, like Trump, falls all over himself in gratitude:

Hagen saw Luca Brasi’s face lose its mask of fury, swell with pride and pleasure, Brasi kissed the Don’s hand before he went out the door that Hagen held open.

So there you have it. Trump has chosen to grovel before Putin when it comes to foreign policy and before Elon Musk when it comes to domestic. He’s Luca Brasi times two and the intimidated GOP applauds.

Further thought: Another read on Lindsey Graham is that he’s not only a soulless apparatchik (although he is that) but also someone outraged that Zelensky is doing what he himself doesn’t have the guts to do, which is stand up to Trump. Driving his anger as the Ukrainian president is his shame.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Erdrich, Snakes, and the Transfiguration

Giovanni Batista Tiepolo, The Immaculate Conception

 Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Sunday

I’m currently on a Louise Erdrich kick, having just reread The Last Report on the Miracles at Little No Horse after immersing myself in LaRose and The Watchman. Last Report, maybe the most spiritual of the Ojibewe author’s novels, features a woman disguising herself as a Catholic priest in order to serve the Little No Horse reservation. Agnes/Father Damien is not so much a trans man as a woman who has chosen to cross-dress for practical purposes. If the Catholic church allowed women priests, she would remain a woman.

The sensitivity she brings to her role dramatizes how much the Catholic church has lost by having only male priests. While the Indians themselves would have no difficulty with a woman priest—we are given examples of Ojibwe men acting as women and Ojibwe women acting as men—Agnes/Father Damien knows that she must keep her identity secret from the church authorities. She even finds a way to hide her death so that the secret won’t be revealed when her dead body is inspected.

The passage I have chosen today involves her “Sermon to the Snakes.” Damien has commissioned a new church, which is set upon a rock that shelters an ancient snake nest. A passionate piano player when she was a woman, Damien finds herself playing to the snakes when an old piano is donated to the church.  Then, emulating St. Francis, she delivers a “Sermon to the Snakes” (below).

Today we celebrate the Transfiguration of Christ, which “encourages us to view creation as a continuously evolving transformation of matter and energy” (John Gatta, The Transfiguration of Christ and Creation). In other words, all of nature is luminous, and this includes snakes. The ones in the novel are caught up by Chopin, Schubert, and Debussy.

At first, Damien doesn’t realize he has them as an audience:

She played in the embrace of that special sense of being heard, that expectancy, but when she finally set her hands in her lap and looked up to acknowledge the listener, no one was there. Only the still new leaves faintly twitching between the studs and the haze of gold light through the tremulous scatter of clouds. It wasn’t until she saw a twist of movement from the corner of her eye that she looked down and saw the snakes.

Damien figure that that must be at least a hundred or more:

 Another moved, quick as a lash. Yet another seeped forward and Agnes put her fingers back upon the keys. A third uncoiled in a question mark that she answered with a smooth barcarolle, which seemed the right thing to play for snakes. She watched them out of the corner of her eyes. They were motionless now, their ligulate, black bellies flat against the stone. Parallel gold stripes down the center of their backs seemed to vibrate in the fresh June light. The snakes looked polished brand-new. Perhaps they’d shed their skins at the door, she thought, and even as her fingers rippled she imagined a pile of frail husks. Their heads were slightly raised off the floor and if they weren’t actually listening to the notes, they were positively fixed on the music. They were suspended, somehow, by whatever means were available to their senses.

And finally:

Growing weary, Agnes at last hit upon the Kinderscenen from Schubert and finally, playing “Sleep” repetitively and with all the kindness of a good parent, she succeeded in driving the snakes, the ginebigoog, back to their beds.

Damien’s Ojibwe mentor, Nanapush, explains the significance of “the ginebigoog” to the community. He observes that

the snake was a sign of great positive concern among the old people, for the snake was a deeply intelligent secretive being, and knew all the cold and blessed spirits who lived under stone and deep in the earth. And it was the great snake, wrapped around the center of the earth, who kept things from flying apart.

The vision isn’t entirely negated by a statue the church commissions, a “Madonna of the Serpents,” in which Mary is depicted as crushing the serpent that tempted Eve. But as someone notes about the statue, “The snake that writhed beneath the Virgin’s feet not only was too realistic, but did not look at all crushed down by her weight.”

In her sermon to the snakes, delivered only to test out the new acoustics, Damien asks, “What is the whole of our existence but the sound of an appalling love?”

In response, the snakes “slid quietly among the feet of the empty pews.” Here are the answers she explores:

What is the question we spend our entire lives asking? Our question is this: Are we loved? I don’t mean by one another. Are we loved by the one who made us? Constantly, we look for evidence. In the gifts we are given—children, good weather, money, a happy marriage perhaps—we find assurance. In contrast, our pains, illnesses, the deaths of those we love, our powers, our innocent misfortunes—those we take as signs that God has somehow turned away. But, my friends, what exactly is love here? How to define it? Does God’s love have anything at all to do with the lack or plethora of good fortune at work in our lives? Or is God’s love, perhaps, something very different from what we think we know?

“Divine love may be so large it cannot see us.

“Or it may be so infinitely tiny that it works on a level where it directs us like an unknown substance buried in our blood.

“Or it may be transparent, an invisible screen, a filter through which we see and hear all that is created.

“Oh my friends…”

The snakes lifted their bullet-smooth heads, flickered their tongues to catch the vibrations of the sounds the being made somewhere before them.

“I am like you,” said Father Damien to the snakes, “curious and small.” He dropped his arms. “Like you, I poise alertly and open by senses to try to read the air, the clouds, the sun’s slant, the little movements of the animals, all in the hope I will learn the secret of whether I am loved.”

The snakes coiled and recoiled, curved over and underneath themselves.

“If I am loved,” Father Damien went on, “it is a merciless and exacting love against which I have no defense. If I am not loved, then I am being pitilessly manipulated by a force I cannot withstand, either, and so it is all the same. I must do what I must do. Go in peace.”

He lifted his hand, blessed the snakes, and then lay down full length in a pew and slept there for the rest of the afternoon.

This comes close to capturing my own vision of God, a force woven into our very being and yet vast beyond comprehending. We “poise alertly”—to nature, to the arts, to each other—hoping to detect God’s love. And then we go on as though it is there because it is only through this belief that life makes sense.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

Trump vs. Zelensky, Harpy vs. Eagle

Gordon Grant, Old Ironsides

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Saturday

I’m so appalled by what I saw yesterday in the White House, with Donald Trump and J.D. Vance throwing their lot in with Vladimir Putin as they ambushed and bullied Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, that I’ve written a special Saturday post. What comes to mind is Oliver Wendell Holmes’s 1830 poem “Old Ironsides.”

The poem was written to save the historic ship U.S.S. Constitution, which was destined for the scrap heap after once having played key roles in both the American Revolution and the War of 1812. The poem generated such support for the ship that it was preserved, and you can still visit it today in Boston.

The actual Constitution is under all-out assault today, as is America’s long-standing position as leader of the free world. I am well aware that the U.S. hasn’t always deserved that moniker—after all, I got arrested in 1971 protesting the Vietnam War—but never has America sided so openly with a dictator against a freedom movement. Trump is desecrating our most cherished ideals.

He and Vance are indeed harpies of the shore, trying to take down an eagle of the sea.

Old Ironsides

Ay, tear her tattered ensign down!
Long has it waved on high,
And many an eye has danced to see
That banner in the sky;
Beneath it rung the battle shout,
And burst the cannon’s roar;—
The meteor of the ocean air
Shall sweep the clouds no more.

Her deck, once red with heroes’ blood,
Where knelt the vanquished foe,
When winds were hurrying o’er the flood,
And waves were white below,
No more shall feel the victor’s tread,
Or know the conquered knee;—
The harpies of the shore shall pluck
The eagle of the sea!

Oh, better that her shattered hulk
Should sink beneath the wave;
Her thunders shook the mighty deep,
And there should be her grave;
Nail to the mast her holy flag,
Set every threadbare sail,
And give her to the god of storms,
The lightning and the gale!

As Trump attempts to tear down the tattered ensign of freedom—both ours and Ukraine’s—we must defend our core ideals, just as people once defended Old Ironsides. Blood has been shed so that the eagle could soar, and the least we can do today—in whatever ways we can—is resist Trump’s fascist takeover. At stake, here and abroad, is government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Cixin Liu Predicted Musk-Style Takeover

Chinese sci-fi author Cixin Liu

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Friday

Sometimes I think our greatest prophets are our authors of dystopian sci-fi. Figures like Ursula K. Le Guin, Margaret Atwood (who prefers the term speculative fiction), and Octavia Butler have proved remarkably accurate in their predictions. And then there’s George Orwell, whose 1984 captures Trumpism so well that some rightwing book banners have been targeting it.

Recently joining these luminaries is Chinese engineer and novelist Cixin Liu. As described by the website The.Ink, Liu has disturbingly anticipated an Elon Musk style takeover in his novel The Three-Body Problem.

The novel is about an advanced society that must leave its collapsing planet and so sets out to take over Earth. To make sure that they don’t meet effective resistance, the inhabitants “monkey wrench human progress by distributing viral propaganda, recruiting allies in the gaming community, cutting sweetheart deals with oligarchs, and interfering with scientific research.” 

This pretty much describes Musk’s DOGE initiative, which is treating the federal government like a video game, even as it steers lucrative contracts to Musk enterprises. Scientific research is especially taking a hit as funds are being cut off and people fired by Musk’s youthful tech vigilantes.

Having described the book, the article then quotes physicist Michael Lubbell from City College of New York to show the depth of the Musk attacks:

Musk has access to all the data on federal research grantees and contractors: social security numbers, tax returns, tax payments, tax rebates, grant disbursements and more. Anyone who depends on the federal government and doesn’t toe the line might become a target. This is right out of [Hungarian prime minister] Viktor Orbán’s playbook.

According to the article, Three-Body Problem “was received (and possibly intended) in China as a critique of the forced transformation of Chinese society during the Cultural Revolution.” Americans, however, are applying it to their own situation:

It’s as if the tech oligarchs who’ve journeyed from South Africa to remake America — the guys who, as therapist Daniel Shaw remarked, “read Orwell’s 1984 and decided the hero was Big Brother” — read Liu’s trilogy and decided the San-Ti (the alien invaders) were the heroes.

I haven’t read Three Body Problem but came across one passage that explains how the extraterrestrials—and how Donald Trump—have managed to scam the public and seize power:

You must know that a person’s ability to discern the truth is directly proportional to his knowledge.

No wonder Trump and Musk want to close down the Department of Education.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

The Chainsaw-Wielding Doge of America

Elon Musk at CPAC

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Thursday

A reader has just reminded me that DOGE—the acronym that Elon Musk invented for his “Department of Government Efficiency”—was also the word that the Republic of Venice once used for its head of state. I’m sure Musk knew this when he came up with the acronym since he aspires to be America’s unofficial head. That fact leads me to two passages, one comic, one not.

The comic one appears in the The Court Jester, a 1956 Danny Kaye comedy that was the first videotape owned by our family. (To this day, my sons can quote large swatches of it by heart.) The scene I have in mind has Kaye, a Robin-Hood type spy named Hawkins who is masquerading as an Italian jester, covering up the fact that he knows nothing of the Doge of Venice, even though he supposedly has been sent by him. King Roderick, who has usurped the throne, asks about the doge, prompting Hawkins to dodge, deflect, and finally launch into the kind of tongue twister for which the actor Kaye was famous. The imagined scenario he invents could describe the bumbling incompetence of Musk’s DOGE team, where everyone has the knives out for everyone:

King Roderick: The Duke. What did the Duke do?
Hawkins: Eh… the Duke do?
Roderick: Yes. And what about the Doge?
Hawkins: Oh, the Doge!
Roderick: Eh. Well what did the Doge do?
Hawkins: The Doge do?
Roderick: Yes, the Doge do.
Hawkins: Well, uh, the Doge did what the Doge does. Eh, uh, when the Doge does his duty to the Duke, that is.
Roderick: What? What’s that?
Hawkins: Oh, it’s very simple, sire. When the Doge did his duty and the Duke didn’t, that’s when the Duchess did the dirt to the Duke with the Doge.
Roderick: Who did what to what?
Hawk: Oh, they all did, sire. There they were in the dark; the Duke with his dagger, the Doge with his dart, Duchess with her dirk.
Roderick: Duchess with her dirk?
Hawkins: Yes! The Duchess dove at the Duke just when the Duke dove at the Doge. Now the Duke ducked, the Doge dodged, and the Duchess didn’t. So the Duke got the Duchess, the Duchess got the Doge, and the Doge got the Duke!

So DOGE Musk is going after essential government employees, thereby sinking Trump’s popularity ratings—which might, if history is any indication, ultimately result in Trump going after Musk. It would be comical if there weren’t thousands of people having their lives upended, not to mention the beneficiaries of the services they administer.

Essentially Musk is aiding Trump in turning the government into one large grift machine, one in which bribes, nepotism, conflict of interest, and corruption will play increasingly large roles. Already it appears that Musk is going after those watchdog agencies that were monitoring him. At the same time, he is steering new goodies towards himself, including government orders for his Tesla cybertrucks and a special FAA contract for Starlink.

All of which leads me to the other great northeastern Italian city, Florence, in which the doge equivalent was the podesta. (I acknowledge that I’m cheating by moving on from “doge,” but I think you’ll find it worth it.) In Lord Byron’s poem The Prophecy of Dante, we hear about Cante dei Gabrielli da Gubbio driving out men of genius like Dante and replacing them with “gilt chamberlains.” After years of service to his beloved Florence as a member of the White Guelph party, Dante never returned because of threatened execution.

While government employees aren’t Dantesque geniuses, they are certainly superior to their replacements. Over just this past week, we’ve seen a Donald Trump, Jr. hunting buddy chosen as the nation’s top food regulator, a three-star Trump-supporting general replacing the far more qualified Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr., and rightwing podcasting shock jock elevated to Deputy Director of the FBI. All of these Trump sycophants, as Byron puts it, stand “sleek and slavish, bowing at his door.”

For all the GOP mantra of “waste, fraud, and abuse,” the current federal workforce, which is chosen through a merit-based system, is actually well-qualified, hardworking, and committed to serving the public. A Washington Post in-depth study debunks the myth federal workers are lazy, concluding that “they work longer hours than their private-sector peers.” The reason, the study’s author thinks, is because of “dedication to their mission.”

This certainly fits the profile of every government employee I know, including a number of former students. Without exception, their major reason for going into government service was “to make a difference.”

 Back to the poem. Byron’s Dante describes a man of genius such as himself as

                         the meanest brute
To bear a burthen, and to serve a need,
To sell his labors, and his soul to boot…

But although “toil[ing] for nations” may leave him poor, it also means that he is free. I think of how so much freer those Republicans are who have broken with Trump than those who continue to grovel before him.

Still it’s hard, and Byron notes the difference between the adulation that nations may bestow upon their “sons of fame” and the wretched state they leave them in:

And how is it that they, the sons of fame,
Whose inspiration seems to them to shine
From high, they whom the nations oftest name,
Must pass their days in penury or pain…

The speaker contrasts these geniuses with governmental suck-ups (“he who sweats for monarchs”), describing such people as

                                                                    no more
Than the gilt chamberlain, who, clothed and fee’d,
Stands sleek and slavish, bowing at his door.

Dante observes that their earthly power, while it resembles God’s power “in outward show, “ is least like God’s “in attibutes divine.” These people tread on people’s necks—or in Musk’s case, fire them—and then assure us that their rights come from God:

Oh, Power that rulest and inspirest! how
Is it that they on earth, whose earthly power
Is likest thine in heaven in outward show,
Least like to thee in attributes divine,
Tread on the universal necks that bow,
And then assure us that their rights are thine?

There you have it: self-righteously citing a great cause and higher mission (“waste, fraud, and abuse”), those unleashed upon us by Donald Trump are rampaging through the federal workforce and our constitutional order. They’ll emerge from the experience with a tidy profit after having degraded life for the rest of us.

Their souls will have been hollowed out as a result. But that appears a tradeoff they’re willing to make.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Singing the Song of Angry Men

Enjolras (Tveit) in Les Misérables

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Wednesday

Living under the shadow of a fascist takeover, sometimes one takes encouragement where one can find it, such as in small acts of rebellion. My recent favorite has been when the Marine chorus entertained a White House function singing the well-known lyrics from Les Misérables: “Do you hear the people sing? Singing a song of angry men? It is the music of a people who will not be slaves again!” I don’t know whether or not a message was being sent but it brought a smile to my face.

Twice over the past four years I’ve turned to Victor Hugo’s 1862 classic to characterize people’s hunger for freedom. The first time occurred in March 2021 when the world was witnessing Russian, Belorussian, and Hong Kong protesters courageously confronting tyrannical authorities. The second time was after Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky had delivered an inspiring New Year address to welcome in 2023. In each instance I compared those resisting tyranny to Enjolras, the idealistic activist who leads an 1832 rebellion against monarch Louis Philippe and who is then, along with his comrades, gunned down by the French military.

I never thought that I would be repurposing those posts for Americans but here we are.

In the novel, Enjolras’s dream is something like the vision the American republic has long had of itself: that it provides a model for the rest of the world. Here’s Hugo:

[F]or some time past, he [Enjolras] had been gradually emerging from the narrow form of dogma, and had allowed himself to incline to the broadening influence of progress, and he had come to accept, as a definitive and magnificent evolution, the transformation of the great French Republic, into the immense human republic….

Addressing his fellow revolutionaries, Enjolras notes that this vision honors all humanity:

Citizens, do you picture the future to yourselves? The streets of cities inundated with light, green branches on the thresholds, nations sisters, men just, old men blessing children, the past loving the present, thinkers entirely at liberty, believers on terms of full equality, for religion heaven, God the direct priest, human conscience become an altar, no more hatreds, the fraternity of the workshop and the school, for sole penalty and recompense fame, work for all, right for all, peace over all, no more bloodshed, no more wars, happy mothers!

Then comes the declaration that should have us all applauding:

 From a political point of view, there is but a single principle; the sovereignty of man over himself. This sovereignty of myself over myself is called Liberty.

Following a mini lecture on the social contract, Enjolras sets forth a Jeffersonian vision of the importance of education. Think of such education as a guard against the constant mendacity and brainwashing that Trump and his minions are engaging in:

[L]egally speaking, [equality] is all aptitudes possessed of the same opportunity; politically, it is all votes possessed of the same weight; religiously, it is all consciences possessed of the same right. Equality has an organ: gratuitous and obligatory instruction. The right to the alphabet, that is where the beginning must be made. The primary school imposed on all, the secondary school offered to all, that is the law. From an identical school, an identical society will spring. Yes, instruction! light! light! everything comes from light, and to it everything returns.

Yes, light! light! everything comes from light!

Enjolras’s high hopes for the 20th century will, to a degree, come to pass, although not until the second half and with some notable exceptions (Serbia’s Milosevič, Russia’s Putin). Thanks to the European Union and NATO, Europe has experienced the longest period of peace and prosperity since the Roman Empire:

Citizens, the nineteenth century is great, but the twentieth century will be happy. Then, there will be nothing more like the history of old, we shall no longer, as today, have to fear a conquest, an invasion, a usurpation, a rivalry of nations, arms in hand, an interruption of civilization depending on a marriage of kings, on a birth in hereditary tyrannies, a partition of peoples by a congress, a dismemberment because of the failure of a dynasty, a combat of two religions meeting face to face, like two bucks in the dark, on the bridge of the infinite; we shall no longer have to fear famine, farming out, prostitution arising from distress, misery from the failure of work and the scaffold and the sword, and battles and the ruffianism of chance in the forest of events. One might almost say: There will be no more events. We shall be happy. The human race will accomplish its law, as the terrestrial globe accomplishes its law; harmony will be re-established between the soul and the star; the soul will gravitate around the truth, as the planet around the light.

And now Trump wants to destroy it all. Enjolras might have had difficulty imagining how once, after achieving something approaching his dream, Europe and America would be so ready to backtrack. Far too many people appear to prefer autocracy to democratic rule.

People like Enjolras gave their lives so that we could have freedom. We spit on their sacrifice when we fail to protect it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

Revere Rides to Awaken Us

N.C. Wyeth, Paul Revere’s Ride

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Tuesday

With Donald Trump fantasizing himself as a king, it’s time (as I noted yesterday) to revisit some of our classic poems about the American Revolution. Longellow’s “Paul Revere’s Ride” has passages in it that, in light of recent developments, chill the blood.

Take, for instance, the spy work undertaken by Revere’s “friend” (probably Christ Church sexton Robert Newman). Instructed to figure out whether the British troops will come by land or by sea, he detects them heading for “their boats on the shore.” The “muster of men” he witnesses has me thinking of Trump’s plans for the military once he strips it of responsible leadership and of military lawyers who would throw up legal “roadblocks” (Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s term) to marching on American civilians:

Meanwhile, his friend, through alley and street
Wanders and watches with eager ears,
Till in the silence around him he hears
The muster of men at the barrack door,
The sound of arms, and the tramp of feet,
And the measured tread of the grenadiers
Marching down to their boats on the shore.

We no longer need daring midnight rides to alert us to the threats that are coming. But we do need intrepid reporting, which we have not been getting from a mainstream media that failed to label Trump as the fascist threat he is proving to be. Our current versions of Newman and Revere and Samuel Dawes (who rode with Revere that night) are increasingly proving to be those independent outlets not in thrall to billionaire owners.

In the poem, Longfellow talks about how “the fate of a nation was riding that night” and how the sparks struck out by the galloping horse “kindled the land into flame with its heat.”

It appears that, thanks to such organizations as Meidas and various substack newsletters, the kindling is beginning. Angry voices, many in deeply red Congressional districts, have been besieging their members of Congress in town meetings. We are increasingly seeing large demonstrations, and lawyers have been attacking Trump and Elon Musk’s executive orders every chance they get. It remains to be seen how effective this all proves to be but Americans are beginning to rally.

The lesson that Longfellow draws from Revere’s ride is that the need for such a wake-up call is not confined to the past. “Throughout all our history,” he declares, we will require the night rider’s “cry of defiance, and not of fear.” “Eternal vigilance,” various activists have stated throughout our history, “is the price of liberty”:

A cry of defiance, and not of fear,
A voice in the darkness, a knock at the door,
And a word that shall echo forevermore!
For, borne on the night-wind of the Past,
Through all our history, to the last,
In the hour of darkness and peril and need,
The people will waken and listen to hear
The hurrying hoof-beats of that steed,
And the midnight message of Paul Revere.
A voice in the darkness, a knock at the door,
And a word that shall echo forevermore!

It so happens that Longfellow wrote “Paul Revere’s Ride” in 1860 to awaken America to the danger of civil war, the poem being composed less than a year before confederate soldiers fired upon Fort Sumpter. We are in our “hour of darkness and peril and need.” The poem, which I used to regard as one of those sing-songy affairs trafficking in patriotic platitudes, now speaks with a fierce urgency.

The great German cultural observer Walter Benjamin describes this transition to relevancy. In his “Theses on the Philosophy of History,” he writes about moments when the past becomes “charged with the time of the now” and is “blasted out of the continuum of history.” It is as though time falls away and we reach through history to “seize hold of a memory.” The American Revolution did this with the Roman republic (which is one reason why there’s a statue of George Washington wearing a toga), and we in turn may increasingly do the same with our own revolution. After all, the man in charge is tweeting out images of himself wearing a crown.

In other words, ask not for whom the rider rides. He rides for thee.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

We’re All Embattled Farmers Now

Demenick D’Andrea, The Shot Heard ‘Round the World

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Monday

Last week Donald Trump tweeted out a picture of himself wearing a crown and proclaiming, “LONG LIVE THE KING!” following his attempt to end Manhattan’s experiment with congestion pricing. While Trump apologists contended that he was just trolling liberals, the declaration is in line with many similar ones, such as that he will be a dictator “on day one,” that “he who saves his Country does not violate any Law,” and (to the governor of Maine) that “We are the federal law.” He might just as well have said, like absolute monarch Louis XIV, “L’état, c’est moi.” [“The state, it is I.”]

“Look at what they do, not what they say,” MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow constantly reminds us, and Trump’s actions since beginning his second term are consistent with one who would like to be king or dictator or a law unto himself. (Especially frightening are his plans for the FBI and the military.) But the king statement has particularly caught people’s attention because, as New Yorker writer Bill McKibben recently observed, Trump is attempting to overturn “the most basic meme in American history.”

Given that the president has us thinking back to George III, it’s time to break out some of our American Revolution-themed poems. Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “Concord Hymn” is a good place to start.

The poem was written in 1837 to dedicate an obelisk erected to commemorate the 1775 Battle of Lexington and Concord. Having heard about stored arms, British troops were on their way to find and destroy them. Thanks to Paul Revere and Samuel Prescott—that’s another poem I may find myself revisiting in the upcoming months—the colonists were warned of their coming. Throughout the day, more and more militiamen showed up to harass the British, with the turning point occurring at Concord’s North Bridge, where outnumbered British regulars fell back under intense fire.

Emerson’s poem serves the same purpose as the monument: to make sure that the spirit of those brave men may never be forgotten. After all, memories are short and people pass away. Or as Emerson puts it,

On this green bank, by this soft stream,
    We set to-day a votive stone;
That memory may their deed redeem,
    When, like our sires, our sons are gone.

It is easy to forget the price that people paid for the freedoms we take for granted. Quoting James Mariott of the London times, Heather Cox Richardson has noted that such forgetting—combined with our relatively comfortable lives—is one reason why we’re in our current mess:

[Mariott] noted that the very stability and comfort of the post–World War II liberal order has permitted the seeds of its own destruction to flourish. A society with firm scientific and political guardrails that protect health and freedom, can sustain “an underbelly of madmen and extremists—medical sceptics, conspiracy types and anti-democratic fantasists.”

Mariott continues,

Our society has been peaceful and healthy for so long that for many people serious disaster has become inconceivable. Americans who parade around in amateur militia groups and brandish Nazi symbols do so partly because they are unable to conceive of what life would actually be like in a fascist state.”

He observes that those who are cheering the rise of autocracy in the United States—who are intrigued with having Trump as king or dictator– “have no serious understanding of what it means to live under an autocratic government.”

Someone on Bluesky (I can’t find the reference) noted that something similar happened in Germany’s recent elections, where the extreme right made disturbing gains: bored rich people looking for something to spice up their lives get together in bars and on the internet to bond over hate. They forget that Hitler brought down unthinkable suffering upon the German people, not to mention the rest of the world.

When I was in elementary school, we memorized Emerson’s poem. We should continue having our kids memorize it:

The Concord Hymn
By Ralph Waldo Emerson

By the rude bridge that arched the flood,
    Their flag to April’s breeze unfurled,
Here once the embattled farmers stood,
    And fired the shot heard round the world.

The foe long since in silence slept;
    Alike the conqueror silent sleeps;
And Time the ruined bridge has swept
    Down the dark stream which seaward creeps.

On this green bank, by this soft stream,
    We set to-day a votive stone;
That memory may their deed redeem,
    When, like our sires, our sons are gone.

Spirit, that made those heroes dare
    To die, and leave their children free,
Bid Time and Nature gently spare
    The shaft we raise to them and thee.

As long as Americans remain in touch with that spirit, they/we will resist Trump’s attempts to restore the monarchy. But it takes courage and constant vigilance to do so.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

Ross Gay on Burial and Resurrection

Poet Gay Ross

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Sunday

Our church’s seminarian recently introduced our congregation to the poetry of Ross Gay, after which I promptly ordered his books for my wife’s birthday. His poem “Burial,” which reminds me somewhat of Wendell Berry’s poem “Testament,” comes close to capturing my own view of resurrection.

The burial in this case is his father’s ashes, which become fertilizer for a plum tree. Or as Gay puts it,

the magic dust our bodies become
casts spells on the roots
about which a dumber man than me
could tell you the chemical processes,
but it’s just magic to me…

Believing that his father is lonely in the jar in which he has been residing, Gay pours him into the hole he has dug, “hoping to coax him back/ for my mother as much as me.”

His father, he says, dives right in, “glad for the robust air.” Gay then inserts the plum tree sapling, describing it as

the flag
to the nation of simple joy
of which my father is now a naturalized citizen…

Gay imagines the roots curling round him

like shawls or jungle gyms, like
hookahs or the arms of ancestors,
before breast-stroking into the xylem,
riding the elevator up
through the cambium and into the leaves where,
when you put your ear close enough,
you can hear him whisper
good morning, where, if you close your eyes
and push your face you can feel
his stubbly jowls…

Then, when the fruit shows up, his father starts having fun:

my father
guffawed by kicking from the first bite
buckets of juice down my chin,
staining one of my two button-down shirts,
the salmon colored silk one, hollering
there’s more of that!
almost dancing now in the plum,
in the tree, the way he did as a person…

Some things never change, the speaker concludes:

he knew he could make you happy
just by being a little silly
and sweet.

Each time I have poured ashes of loved ones into earth or water—my oldest son’s, my parents’—I have felt that a sacred mingling was going on. Gay reminds me that the joy of growth also awaits.

Burial
By Ross Gay

You’re right, you’re right,
the fertilizer’s good—
it wasn’t a gang of dullards
came up with chucking
a fish in the planting hole
or some mid-wife got lucky
with the placenta—
oh, I’ll plant a tree here!
and a sudden flush of quince
and jam enough for months—yes,
the magic dust our bodies become
casts spells on the roots
about which a dumber man than me
could tell you the chemical processes,
but it’s just magic to me,
which is why a couple springs ago
when first putting in my two bare root plum trees
out back I took the jar which has become
my father’s house,
and lonely for him and hoping to coax him back
for my mother as much as me,
poured some of him in the planting holes
and he dove in glad for the robust air,
saddling a slight gust
into my nose and mouth,
chuckling as I coughed,
but mostly he disappeared
into the minor yawns in the earth
into which I placed the trees,
splaying wide their roots,
casting the grey dust of my old man
evenly throughout the hole,
replacing then the clods
of dense Indiana soil until the roots
and my father were buried,
watering it in all with one hand
while holding the tree
with the other straight as the flag
to the nation of simple joy
of which my father is now a naturalized citizen,
waving the flag
from his subterranean lair,
the roots curled around him
like shawls or jungle gyms, like
hookahs or the arms of ancestors,
before breast-stroking into the xylem,
riding the elevator up
through the cambium and into the leaves where,
when you put your ear close enough,
you can hear him whisper
good morning, where, if you close your eyes
and push your face you can feel
his stubbly jowls and good lord
this year he was giddy at the first
real fruit set and nestled into the 30 or 40 plums
in the two trees, peering out from the sweet meat
with his hands pressed against the purple skin
like cathedral glass,
and imagine his joy as the sun
wizarded forth those abundant sugars
and I plodded barefoot
and prayerful at the first ripe plum’s swell and blush,
almost weepy conjuring
some surely ponderous verse
to convey this bottomless grace,
you know, oh father oh father kind of stuff,
hundreds of hot air balloons
filling the sky in my chest, replacing his intubated body
listing like a boat keel side up, replacing
the steady stream of water from the one eye
which his brother wiped before removing the tube,
keeping his hand on the forehead
until the last wind in his body wandered off,
while my brother wailed like an animal,
and my mother said, weeping,
it’s ok, it’s ok, you can go honey,
at all of which my father
guffawed by kicking from the first bite
buckets of juice down my chin,
staining one of my two button-down shirts,
the salmon colored silk one, hollering
there’s more of that!
almost dancing now in the plum,
in the tree, the way he did as a person,
bent over and biting his lip
and chucking the one hip out
then the other with his elbows cocked
and fists loosely made
and eyes closed and mouth made trumpet
when he knew he could make you happy
just by being a little silly
and sweet.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed