Joe Biden as a Tom Robbins Character

80-years-old and still going strong

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Monday

As Joe Biden continues to chalk up unlikely wins while wrestling with a party uninterested in governing, his opponents, some of his allies, and several mainstream media outlets are obsessing about his age.  After the president tripped on a sandbag left on a stage, for instance, the New York Times ominously intoned, “Anyone can trip at any age, but for an 80-year-old president, it inevitably raises unwelcome questions.”

“Raises unwelcome questions,” I’ll point out, are weasel words which fail to consider a number of factors, including the benefits of immense experience and a calm demeanor.

Anyway, the complaints brings to mind Jitterbug Perfume (1984), my favorite novel by the whacky Tom Robbins. In it, a king rebels against his culture’s discomfort with elderly rulers. In this case, discomfort leads to death since the king is executed upon “the debut of wrinkles or gray hairs.” As the novel explains,

Regarding its rulers as semidivine—god-men upon whom the course of nature depended—the clan believed widespread catastrophes would result from the gradual enfeeblement of the ruler and the final extinction of his powers in death. The only way to avert those calamities was to kill the king as soon as he showed symptoms of decay, so that his soul might be transferred to a vigorous young successor before it had been impaired.

Upon finding his first white hair, King Alobar suddenly concludes that the whole system is unfair. And he’s got reason to since he has been a very successful king. As his consort Wren points out, he has ruled not through his physical prowess but through his intelligence:

There are men inside these city walls more powerfully built than you, Alobar; more adept with the spear. Men who can run faster, hurl a stone farther, face an awesome enemy with an equal absence of trembling, and pacify a harem with as sturdy a shaft. But you, well, while I cannot imagine how you acquired it, you have a brain. Time and time again, you have demonstrated your unusual ability to see inside of men and to interpret the silent pleas they aim at the stars. In the past, many kings have ruled this people. You have governed them.

We learn from Wren that the village necromancer—which is to say, the so-called expert—resents what he sees as an encroachment on his domain:

The heroics of past rulers only kept your kingdom in a state of agitation. You have calmed it. And Noog resents you for that, because as a result of your reasonable leadership, the necromancer is less necessary and less admired.

We’ve seen what four years of constant agitation brought us. Biden’s promise to return us to normalcy should be a relief to all those who prefer their leaders to be more interested in problem solving than in reality television-style theatrics.

Our white-haired president has brought back competence and integrity to the White House. Anyone who wants something else would do well to remember Aesop’s fable of “The Frogs Who Wished for a King.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

The Trinity: Beyond, Beside Us, and Within

Hendrick van Balen the Elder (1620s)

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Trinity Sunday

If you’ve ever been confused by the Holy Trinity, welcome to the club. There are those who see Christianity as a polytheistic religion because it appears to have multiple gods, and there are those who have been deemed heretics (the Arians) because, reasoning the matter out, have concluded that Jesus is not co-eternal with God. After all, if he has been begotten from “the Father,” then he must be subordinate to him.

To such minds, I would imagine, the Nicene Creed dances around the issue with its “begotten, not made, of one Being with the Father.” And the same would go for the Holy Spirit, who we are told “proceeds from the Father and the Son. With the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified.” If two of the three gods come second or third, how can there not be subordination?

To be sure, there are those who dismiss the use of reason altogether in articulating the nature of the Trinity. Thomas Browne in the 17th  century, drawing on the 3rd century Christian writer Tertulian, said, “I believe because it is absurd” and that, if anything, Christianity is too logical. “Methinks there be not impossibilities enough in Religion for an active faith,” he writes in The Religion of a Physician (1643). But this strikes me as the kind of self-complacent thing one can say only if everyone around one is a Christian. 

I, who need some rational explanation, understand the Trinity as an expression of our evolving understanding of God, whom we first saw as a being outside ourselves, then potentially existing within an extraordinary individual, and finally as potentially within all of us. But I should emphasize, as I engage in this discussion, that I am no theologian. Far deeper minds that mine have grappled with the nature of the Trinity.

I also understand that Reason has limits. While I don’t leave my reasoning mind at the door as I enter a church—that way lies superstition—neither do I think that one can understand God through Reason alone. Recently I have started wondering whether there is more of a poetic truth than a literal truth to the Trinity—which is to say, a truth that provides glimpses of something more profound than expository prose can provide. In other words, perhaps we should look first to poets and artists rather than to logicians for understanding.

I started thinking this way about the Trinity after reading a lyric by the remarkable Malcolm Guite, an Anglican priest and poet who writes sonnets for all the church’s festivals. In “Trinity Sunday,” which we Anglicans celebrate today, he revels in the apparent contradictions.

For Guite, there’s a beginning but it’s “not in time or space.” God is “three in one and one in three, in rhyme,/In music, in the whole creation story.” God gave us the gift of imagination and so we “sing the chord that calls us to the dance,/ Three notes resounding from a single tone.” We have poetry and music to “sing the End in whom we all began,” a line that may echo T.S. Eliot’s “in my beginning is my end” (Four Quartets). Our God is “beyond, beside us and within.”

Rationally, this may not seem logical. Poetically, however, it coheres and carries a kind of conviction.

Trinity Sunday
My Malcolm Guite

In the Beginning, not in time or space,
But in the quick before both space and time,
In Life, in Love, in co-inherent Grace,
In three in one and one in three, in rhyme,
In music, in the whole creation story,
In His own image, His imagination,
The Triune Poet makes us for His glory,
And makes us each the other’s inspiration.
He calls us out of darkness, chaos, chance,
To improvise a music of our own,
To sing the chord that calls us to the dance,
Three notes resounding from a single tone,
To sing the End in whom we all begin;
Our God beyond, beside us and within.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

English Patient Taught Me about My Father

Andrews as Kip in The English Patient

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Friday

An episode from The English Patient, which I finished listening to on Tuesday, has helped me understand a pivotal point in my father’s life. I think I now know why, at 22, he turned away from his religious upbringing and became an ardent pacifist, a fatalistic determinist, a member of the War Resisters’ League, and a lifelong activist. It involves the concentration camp at Dachau, which he witnessed three days after it was liberated, although this is not the pivot point I have in mind, traumatic though it was.

Before getting to his World War II experiences, here’s the episode in Michael Ondaatje’s novel. Four individuals—a Canadian nurse named Hana, a Sikh bomb expert nicknamed Kip, a Canadian-Italian thief, and a severely burned “English patient”—have formed a community within a partially destroyed Italian monastery following Victory in Europe day. A love relationship is developing between Hana and Kip who, despite his brother’s admonitions against ever trusting Europeans, has come from India and joined a British bomb squad. All seems well until Kip hears a piece of news on the radio:

She sees him in the field, his hands clasped over his head, then realizes this is a gesture not of pain but of his need to hold the earphones tight against his brain. He is a hundred yards away from her in the lower field when she hears a scream emerge from his body which had never raised its voice among them. He sinks to his knees, as if unbuckled. Stays like that and then slowly gets up and moves in a diagonal towards his tent…

It so happens that Kip is going for his rifle. Seemingly unhinged, he brings it into the sickroom, apparently prepared to shoot the English patient. When he finally speaks, it is out of disillusion and a deep sense of betrayal:

I grew up with traditions from my country, but later, more often, from your country. Your fragile white island that with customs and manners and books and prefects and reason somehow converted the rest of the world. You stood for precise behavior.

And further on:

You and then the Americans converted us. With your missionary rules. And Indian soldiers wasted their lives as heroes so they could be pukkah [gentlemen]. You had wars like cricket. How did you fool us into this? Here…listen to what you people have done.

The news on the radio is about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, about which Kip says,

When you start bombing the brown races of the world, you’re an Englishman. You had King Leopold of Belgium and now you have fucking Harry Truman of the USA. You all learned it from the English.

Kip’s anger is not only at the British but at himself for ignoring his brother and believing in what he sees as their false claims to a higher civilization:

My brother told me. Never turn your back on Europe. The deal makers. The contract makers. The map drawers. Never trust Europeans, he said. Never shake hands with them. But we, oh, we were easily impressed—by speeches and medals and your ceremonies. What have I been doing these last few years? Cutting away, defusing limbs of evil. For what? For this to happen?

Kip then walks out of their lives, never to be seen by them again.

So here’s my theory of how Hiroshima and Nagasaki traumatized my father. Some background is needed first. One of his jobs when he was stationed in Munich in 1945 was to take Germans on compulsory tours of Dachau. This way they had to confront what their nation had done rather than writing it off as American propaganda. The horror was so immense that they did everything they could to shift responsibility.

In fact, the only time that my wonderfully kind father ever expresses any anger in his letters home is over their attempts to escape blame. As he wrote on Sept. 17, 1945,

…the Germans seem to think they were liberated from [the ardent Nazis], instead of conquered with them. They aren’t afraid of the rest of the world; they just think it silly that the rest of the world should feel that way about them…

After August 6 and 8, the Germans that my father was taking around Dachau suddenly had new leverage. As my father used to tell me, “They said, ‘You say we were bad, but look at what you did.’” In other words, they used a form of “whataboutism” to feel better about themselves.

Only, with my father, it worked. Like Kip, he had thought he was fighting a battle of good against evil—Dachau showed him evil beyond imagining—only to see his own country unleash Armageddon on two civilian populations.

I knew that Hiroshima and Nagasaki hit him hard, but reading about Kip’s reaction gave me a better sense of just how deep his own sense of betrayal went. Having believed fervently in the war, at 22 he lost faith in his own country and never entirely regained it.

Fortunately, he turned that disillusion to good ends. He broke politically with his Republican family and would spend the rest of his life fighting against the white, male, straight, upper class, warmongering establishment. When I got arrested in an anti-war demonstration following the Kent State killings, he chided me for not having forewarned him. He said would have come up to Minneapolis and gotten incarcerated along with me.

But despite his having made the best of the situation, I was always vaguely aware of the scar. English Patient helped me put my finger on it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Faulkner Understood How Racism Works

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Thursday

I reflect today upon why I have become riveted by William Faulkner this past year. My fascination started with Intruder in the Dust, moved on to Absalom, Absalom! (which I first read in a Carleton College English class), and has concluded with Sanctuary, Sound and the Fury, and Light in August. (I gave up on The Reivers because it seemed too lightweight.) I think the fascination has something to do with the racism that saturated the rural Tennessee environment in which I grew up, which sent me fleeing to a college close to the Canadian border when I turned 18.

To be sure, as a child I didn’t witness anything resembling the horrific acts recounted in Faulkner’s books. Because it is a university town, Sewanee was cushioned against racism’s worst excesses; the racism there was gentile, not violent lower class. Still, Sewanee was less than 20 miles from Estill Springs where, a mere 36 years before we arrived (which was in 1954) there had been a horrific lynching: a mob first tortured Jim McIlherron and then burned him alive. And throughout my childhood there was still an unofficial sunset provision in the county five miles from us (“no n— after sundown”). Also, we’re not far from Birmingham, Alabama, the church bombing there having occurred when I was 12.

Anyway, I grew up hearing the n-word daily. Some of my playmates would refer to the Black section of Sewanee as n—town, and there was a white girl with large lips that I remember being referred to as n—lips. I also recall non-stop n-jokes.

Some of this was still going on when I returned to the area prior to enrolling in graduate school. For instance, the publisher of the Winchester Herald-Chronicle—I was a reporter there in 1974-75—used the n-word daily. (I remember him being bitterly disappointed when Muhammad Ali defeated George Foreman.)  I wince every time that I hear the word, which means that I wince non-stop through Faulkner’s novels.

But for that reason, I feel that there’s something important to learn about the culture I grew up in. So I wince and read.

I’ve written in the past about my view that, while Faulkner himself was a racist, his novels are not, and this is nowhere so true as Light in August, which I finished last week. In dissecting his own culture, the author shows that the racial distinctions upon which people base their entire identities are paper thin. The very fact that they use the n-word without thinking—the way one breathes without thinking—makes anything that disturbs their comfortable certainty feel cataclysmic. Joe Christmas disturbs that certainty.

That’s because his racial identity is unclear. His mother is knocked up by a circus performer traveling through the area, but whether he is a Mexican or a Black man or a dark-skinned White man is never thoroughly established. By the standards of the American south, a Black father would make Joe Black, but Faulkner keeps it vague. Joe’s grandfather, however, has no doubts. Crazed by his fear of miscegenation, he won’t let a doctor administer to the mother, with the result that she dies in childbirth. Then he spirits the child away to a White orphanage.

White enough to pass, Joe grows up not knowing whether he’s Black or White and this uncertainty, which messes with his society’s racial certainties, messes with his own sense of himself as well. For parts of the book, he is at war with himself.

As long as the white community thinks he’s White, they are only mildly scandalized when he starts sleeping with a woman in the area. It’s a bit worse when he kills her, but even that is at a whole different level from when they conclude that he is Black. At that point,  it’s “a Black Man has killed a White woman!” and everyone, now knowing where they stand, goes into a frenzy. By having been racially ambiguous, Joe challenged their categories, but now they can engage in self-righteous and horrific acts.

One of those outraged is 25-year-old Percy Grimm, a member of the civilian military, who, upon Joe’s arrest, sets himself up as a guardian of the peace. Faulkner could be describing any number of our own fascist paramilitaries, who have been flourishing since the Obama presidency and who, encouraged by Trump (I’m thinking here of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers), were willing to invade the Capitol to keep him in office. Like Grimm, they feel a sense of validation when someone in authority gives them legitimacy:

It was the new civilian-military act which saved him. He was like a man who had been for a long time in a swamp, in the dark. It was as though he not only could see no path ahead of him, he knew that there was none. Then suddenly his life opened definite and clear. The wasted years in which he had shown no ability in school, in which he had been known as lazy, recalcitrant, without ambition, were behind him, forgotten. He could now see his life opening before him, uncomplex and inescapable as a barren corridor, completely freed now of ever again having to think or decide, the burden which he now assumed and carried as bright and weightless and martial as his insignatory brass: a sublime and implicit faith in physical courage and blind obedience, and a belief that the white race is superior to any and all other races and that the American is superior to all other white races and that the American uniform is superior to all men, and that all that would ever be required of him in payment for this belief, this privilege, would be his own life. On each national holiday that had any martial flavor whatever he dressed in his captain’s uniform and came downtown. And those who saw him remembered him again on the day of the fight with the ex-soldier as, glittering, with his marksman’s badge (he was a fine shot) and his bars, grave, erect, he walked among the civilians with about him an air half belligerent and half the self-conscious pride of a boy.

When Joe escapes from prison, Grimm gets his glory moment, first shooting and then castrating him:

When they approached to see what he was about, they saw that the man was not dead yet, and when they saw what Grimm was doing one of the men gave a choked cry and stumbled back into the wall and began to vomit. Then Grimm too sprang back, flinging behind him the bloody butcher knife. “Now you’ll let white women alone, even in hell,” he said.

Faulkner helps me make sense of what was going on in my world as a child—how, beneath seemingly innocuous daily life was a deep evil. Skin color in the United States defined a lethal caste system that gave every White immigrant—the wretched refuse of Europe’s teeming shores—automatic status. As a poor Irish or Italian or Slav, you might be treated as scum, but at least you weren’t Black, and your sense of dignity became dependent on those feelings of superiority. Take that away and you could feel like you were nothing. As President LBJ once put it, “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

But it’s not only my past that is drawing me to Faulkner but the present as well. The author alerts us to how racism still plays a significant role in American life. Indeed, the Confederate flag, which I see daily on Tennessee pickup trucks, has migrated north. It even made an appearance in the January 6 coup attempt.

While I don’t think racists are in the majority, they exist in large enough numbers to have an impact on our nation. Novels like Absalom, Absalom! and Light in August reveal the dynamics at work.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

June Is Short and We Must Joy in It

Francis Ledwidge, Irish World War I poet who died in 1917

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Wednesday

To welcome in June, I share today an absolutely gorgeous poem by Francis Ledwidge, and the lyric takes on even more power when one learns about the author. That Ledwidge, who came from a poor Irish family, was killed by a German shell during World War I gives a special meaning to the lines,

…for June is short
And we must joy in it and dance and sing,
And from her bounty draw her rosy worth.

Indeed, the next line– Ay! soon the swallows will be flying south—may allude to John Keats’s ominous final line in “Ode: To Autumn”: “And gathering swallows twitter in the skies.” Ledwidge follows up his dark forecast with a powerful conclusion:

The wind wheels north to gather in the snow
Even the roses spilt on youth’s red mouth
Will soon blow down the road all roses go.

I don’t know whether this carpé diem or “seize the day” poem was written before World War I or during—both are possible—but it certainly forecast Ledwidge’s own end. He died at 29.

June
By Francis Ledwidge

Broom out the floor now, lay the fender by,
And plant this bee-sucked bough of woodbine there,
And let the window down. The butterfly
Floats in upon the sunbeam, and the fair
Tanned face of June, the nomad gipsy, laughs
Above her widespread wares, the while she tells
The farmer’s fortunes in the fields, and quaffs
The water from the spider-peopled wells.
The hedges are all drowned in green grass seas,
And bobbing poppies flare like Elmo’s light
While siren-like the pollen-stained bees
Drone in the clover depths. And up the height
The cuckoo’s voice is hoarse and broke with joy.
And on the lowland crops the crows make raid,
Nor fear the clappers of the farmer’s boy,
Who sleeps, like drunken Noah, in the shade.

And loop this red rose in that hazel ring
That snares your little ear, for June is short
And we must joy in it and dance and sing,
And from her bounty draw her rosy worth.
Ay! soon the swallows will be flying south,
The wind wheel north to gather in the snow
Even the roses spilt on youth’s red mouth
Will soon blow down the road all roses go.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Moby Dick and Whales with a Grudge

A boat sunk off the coast of Portugal by orcas

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Tuesday

While I admire Moby Dick, I’ve always questioned whether a whale would seek vengeance the way that Moby Dick does. After all, it isn’t only Ahab that prolongs their battle to three days. Isn’t Melville guilty of anthropomorphizing Moby Dick when he has the whale stick around to finish off Ahab and his vessel?

Recent news reports of killer whales attacking boats have me questioning my view, however. According to an article in Scientific American, some whale experts have speculated that the attacks “may be a response to a bad past experience involving a boat”—say, from sustaining injuries from a collision or becoming entangled in a fishing line.

To be sure, there are other hypotheses, including that “the killer whales have invented a new fad, something that subpopulations of these members of the dolphin family are known to do.”

In any event, there appear to be increasing instances of orca-boat contact, with 49 instances recorded in 2020 alone. According to the article,

the orcas preferentially attack the boats’ rudder, sometimes scraping the hull with their teeth. Such attacks often snap the rudder, leaving the boat unable to navigate. In three cases, the animals damaged a boat so badly that it sank: In July 2022 they sank a sailboat with five people onboard. In November 2022 they caused a sailboat carrying four to go down. And finally, in this month’s attack, the Swiss sailing yacht Champagne had to be abandoned, and the vessel sank while it was towed to shore.

The whale in Melville’s novel seems to have it in for Ahab and his crew. On the first day of the chase, the author attributes a “malicious intelligence” to Moby Dick as the whale “shoot[s] his pleated head lengthwise beneath the [whaling] boat.” Melville notes that the whale “dallied with the doomed craft in this devilish way.”

By the third day, Moby Dick has associated the hunt with the mother ship and so decides to take that boat out as well. We are told that the whale is driven by revenge:  

From the ship’s bows, nearly all the seamen now hung inactive; hammers, bits of plank, lances, and harpoons, mechanically retained in their hands, just as they had darted from their various employments; all their enchanted eyes intent upon the whale, which from side to side strangely vibrating his predestinating head, sent a broad band of overspreading semicircular foam before him as he rushed. Retribution, swift vengeance, eternal malice were in his whole aspect, and spite of all that mortal man could do, the solid white buttress of his forehead smote the ship’s starboard bow, till men and timbers reeled. Some fell flat upon their faces. Like dislodged trucks, the heads of the harpooneers aloft shook on their bull-like necks. Through the breach, they heard the waters pour, as mountain torrents down a flume.

The Scientific American article observes, however, that the Mediterranean orcas, unlike Melville’s sperm whale, don’t appear to transfer their grudge (if it is in fact a grudge) from boats to humans. They haven’t gone after people who ended up in the water.

Still, the vindictive aspect of Moby Dick isn’t quite a far-fetched as I once thought it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

A War Hero Who Derided Memorials

Soldier, poet and author Siegfried Sassoon

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Monday – Memorial Day

One of the key monuments memorializing the war dead is the Menin Gate Memorial to the Missing, which is dedicated to the 55,000 unnamed British and Commonwealth soldiers who were killed in the five World War I battles while defending the so-called Ypres Salient. (Over a million soldiers lost their lives in those battles.) One man who was not impressed was poet soldier Siegfried Sassoon.

Sassoon sees the memorial as scant compensation for Ypres’s “dim defenders.” Given that the memorial is honoring nameless soldiers, Sassoon points out the irony in its claim that “their name liveth forever.” While Sassoon himself acted heroically in the war, at one point single-handedly capturing a German trench and scattering 60 German soldiers, he eventually turned pacifist and came to oppose the war, barely avoiding court martial. As he saw it, what had started out as a war of defense became a senseless slaughter for dubious ends.

In “On Passing the New Menin Gate,” written years later in 1927, he imagines the dead returning to deride “this sepulcher of crime.” Those responsible for the war think they can pay off the dead with “a pile of peace-complacent stone.”

It is a sentiment reminiscent of Wilfred Owen, whose poetry Sassoon encouraged and, after Owen’s death in the last week of the war, promoted. I’m thinking particularly of “Dulce et Decorum Est,” where Owen savagely attacks the notion that “it is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country.” In “Anthem for Doomed Youth,” meanwhile, Owen says that passing bells are inadequate “for these who die as cattle.”

For Sassoon’s part, in “Menin Gate” he speaks of “the unheroic dead who fed the guns.” No one can “absolve the foulness of their fate,/ Those doomed, conscripted, unvictorious ones”:

On Passing the New Menin Gate
By Siegfried Sassoon

Who will remember, passing through this Gate,
the unheroic dead who fed the guns?
Who shall absolve the foulness of their fate,-
Those doomed, conscripted, unvictorious ones?

    Crudely renewed, the Salient holds its own.
    Paid are its dim defenders by this pomp;
    Paid, with a pile of peace-complacent stone,
    The armies who endured that sullen swamp.

Here was the world’s worst wound. And here with pride
‘Their name liveth for ever’, the Gateway claims.
Was ever an immolation so belied
as these intolerably nameless names?
Well might the Dead who struggled in the slime
Rise and deride this sepulcher of crime.

While war memorials are important, we prove ourselves deserving of derision if we do not do all in our power to prevent the wars that make them necessary.

Menin Gate Memorial to the Missing, Ypres, Belgium
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Cormorant Delivers Pentecostal Message

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Spiritual Sunday – Pentecost

Reprinted (and slightly amended) from June 12, 2011

Today is Pentecost, which falls 50 days after the Resurrection and ten days after Jesus ascended to heaven.  As the disciples were coming together to pray, they experienced a sound that “came from heaven like the rush of a mighty wind.” Tongues of fire danced above their heads, and “they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.”

To mark this day, I offer up a fine Pentecost poem by Nobel laureate Derek Walcott.

I’m no theologian or Biblical scholar, but I regard Pentecost as the third step in an evolution of consciousness.  This three-step process finds metaphorical expression in the figure of the Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.  At one point in history, God was seen as external.  Then an extraordinary man, Jesus of Nazareth, discovered that he—and therefore all of us–had God within him.  The “Counselor” that Jesus spoke of sending to humankind was the revelation that we are all of us “sons of light” (John 12:36), transcendent beings as well as material men and women. As Jesus told the disciples (John 14:12), “He who believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do, because I go to the Father.”

But just as people were once dependent on an external God, the disciples were at risk of becoming dependent on a physically present Jesus.  They had to learn to listen to the guide they carried within.  As Jesus explained (John 16:7), “it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you.”

The Counselor may be always present, but we spend much of our lives shutting him/her/it out.  Walcott’s poem captures our sense of being lost through images of “rootless concrete” and snow-covered city sidewalks.  Here’s his poem:

Pentecost
By Derek Walcott

Better a jungle in the head
than rootless concrete.
Better to stand bewildered
by the fireflies’ crooked street;

winter lamps do not show
where the sidewalk is lost,
nor can these tongues of snow
speak for the Holy Ghost;

the self-increasing silence
of words dropped from a roof
points along iron railings,
direction, in not proof.

But best is this night surf
with slow scriptures of sand,
that sends, not quite a seraph,
but a late cormorant,

whose fading cry propels
through phosphorescent shoal
what, in my childhood gospels,
used to be called the Soul.

Walcott may be having a conversation with “Little Gidding,” T. S. Eliot’s own Pentecost poem.  Eliot’s poem also begins in “the dark time of the year” with a brief and glowing afternoon sun “flam[ing] the ice, on pond and ditches” as it attempts to “stir[ ] the dumb spirit”:

The brief sun flames the ice, on pond and ditches,
In windless cold that is the heart’s heat,
Reflecting in a watery mirror
A glare that is blindness in the early afternoon.
And glow more intense than blaze of branch, or brazier,
Stirs the dumb spirit: no wind, but pentecostal fire
In the dark time of the year.

But where Eliot, writing in the early days of World War II, finds images of a painful but ultimately cleansing purification in the fire of the London blitzkrieg, Walcott turns to his Caribbean childhood, spent in Santa Lucia and Trinidad, to find God.  It is as though his mind must travel there because he is having trouble hearing God in the cities, with their cold streetlamps lining the regulated sidewalks. 

While Walcott surely would not be experiencing snow during this time of year, he could well be thinking of winters in Boston, where he taught and where sidewalks regularly disappear beneath a blanket of snow. Snow functions as a metaphor for a deadening of the spirit in both Eliot’s Waste Land, where the poet talks of “forgetful snow,” and James Joyce’s “The Dead,” where we see “snow falling faintly through the universe and faintly falling, like the descent of their last end, upon all the living and the dead.”

The Spirit’s message hasn’t been entirely erased from this snowy landscape. After all, railings peer out from the snow, hieroglyphs that seem to be delivering some kind of message. But that message is nowhere near as powerful as that which the poet finds in the Caribbean.

The tongues of fire that can rouse us from our stupor and put us once again in touch with soul are the fireflies that light a crooked street. The Holy Spirit is “the jungle in the head,” speaking to Walcott through the remembered cry of a (not quite an angel) cormorant.  The Pentecostal wind of the night surf, with its “slow scriptures of sand,” sends the cry.  Or put another way, the adult poet remembers that cry, now fading with time, and is taken back to the phosphorescent shoal of his childhood when God seemed alive and present.

Pentecost is a day that reminds us that “what used to be called the Soul” continues to walk amongst us.  Or rather, within us.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

In Censoring Gorman, We Censor Hope

Amanda Gorman at the presidential inauguration

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Friday

Thanks to a mother with far-right views, Amanda Gorman’s “The Hill We Climb,” which the poet read at Joe Biden’s presidential inauguration, is no longer available to elementary school students in a Florida K-8 school. According to a Washington Post article, following Daily Salinas’s complaint, the Bob Graham Education Center in Miami Lakes restricted elementary school access to Gorman’s book, although it did “deem the book suitable for middle school students,” saying that it had “educational value because of its historical significance.”

In other words, the school would keep the poem from my grandson, who was eight at the time the poem came out and whose reaction to it was “Wow!”

Alban and I examined the poem together as part of a “civics through poetry” unit I had put together for him. (His school during the Covid shutdown was encouraging family members to help with their kids’ educations.) I gave Alban poems both old and new, everything from Longfellow and Whitman to Gorman and Langston Hughes—and speaking of the latter, I note that, thanks to the mother’s objections, the school has also restricted Love to Langston.

Since Salinas voiced her objections, her political background has come to light. She apparently attended at least one rally of the Proud Boys, members of whom have been convicted of seditious conspiracy for the January 6 attack, and she attended a school board protest last year with Moms For Liberty, a rightwing group that has been seeking to ban books around the country. She has also posted a summary of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, an antisemitic forgery that Hitler used to justify the Holocaust, on her Facebook page. (She has since apologized for that.) One book that she does support, according to Daily Beast, is Mike Huckabee’s The Kids Guide to Ron DeSantis.

While admitting that she had not read Gorman’s poem in its entirety, Salinas complained that it contained “indirect hate messages.”

Salinas can believe what she believes, of course. What is troubling is how a school system will buckle to rightwing voices (one rightwing voice in this case). Saying that it “erred on the side of caution” in limiting student access, it has opened itself up to further bullying.

I share below some of the blog essay I wrote when examining the poem with Alban two and a half years ago. At one point I quoted what Washington Post’s Karen Attiah had to say about Gorman’s reading:

[S]he was not a luxury. The purifying power of poetry has existed as long as humans have wielded words. And for women especially, as [poet Audre] Lorde said, poetry “is a vital necessity of our existence.” Biden’s inaugural words about unity and coming together were good and helpful and presidential. But it was Gorman’s truth that was the necessary one.

Necessary for Black women in America. In a country that so loves to profit from our political, cultural and emotional labor, Gorman reminded those of us who live at the intersection of sexism and racism that we do not have the luxury of settling for hollow #BlackWomenWillSaveUs platitudes. Not when this country is unable to save us from discrimination, police brutality or dying in childbirth.

I was struck by how readily Gorman rose to the challenge of occasional poetry (poetry written for a special occasion), which used to be a common expectation and income source for poets in centuries past but has fallen out of fashion. She succeeded in part by channeling the voice of previous African American orators and poets. Her “we will rise” refrain, for instance, echoes both Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech (“this nation will rise up”) and Maya Angelou’s “Still I Rise.”

America as a city on a hill, of course, has a long tradition, stemming back to John Winthrop’s injunction to build a civilization where “the eyes of all people are upon us.” John Kennedy invoked the image shortly after being elected, as did Ronald Reagan. Gorman’s focus is on climbing that hill, climbing having its own rich history within the African American community, from the Negro spiritual “We are climbing Jacob’s ladder” to Langston Hughes’s “Mother to Son.” Hughes’s poem concludes,

So boy, don’t you turn back.
Don’t you set down on the steps
‘Cause you finds it’s kinder hard.
Don’t you fall now —
For I’se still goin’, honey,
I’se still climbin’,
And life for me ain’t been no crystal stair.

And then there’s the late Naomi Long Madgett’s “Midway,” which I have written about, which concludes with the line, “Mighty mountains loom before me and I won’t stop now.”

In Gorman’s poem, my grandson particularly liked the lines,

[B]eing American is more than a pride we inherit,
it’s the past we step into
and how we repair it.
We’ve seen a force that would shatter our nation
rather than share it,
that would destroy our country if it meant delaying democracy,
and this effort very nearly succeeded.
But while democracy can periodically be delayed,
it can never be permanently defeated.

Alban also felt inspired and personally challenged by the closing lines:

[W]hen the day comes we step out of the shade
aflame and unafraid,
the new dawn blooms as we free it,
for there is always light
if only we’re brave enough to see it,
if only we’re brave enough
to be it.

Think of how much we want young people to encounter this idealism.

Discussing the poem in light of the Capitol Hill seditionists, Alban and I found comfort in Gorman’s confidence in the future. (Alban said, “Wow!” while watching a video of her delivering the poem.) We also looked at the poem’s style. While written in free verse (no regular rhyme or rhythm), it does have a few rhymes (the best ones are often female, such as “inherit,” “repair it,” and “share it”), along with puns and alliteration. I challenged Alban to find the largest alliterative cluster, which he did (“to compose a country committed/ to all cultures, colors, characters and conditions of man”).

“The Hill We Climbed” deepened my grandson’s patriotism and his belief in the American promise. To rule that the poem is not appropriate for kids his age is an abomination.

Here’s the poem in its entirety:

The Hill We Climb
By Amanda Gorman

When day comes we ask ourselves,
where can we find light in this never-ending shade?
The loss we carry,
a sea we must wade
We’ve braved the belly of the beast
We’ve learned that quiet isn’t always peace
And the norms and notions
of what just is
Isn’t always just-ice
And yet the dawn is ours
before we knew it
Somehow we do it
Somehow we’ve weathered and witnessed
a nation that isn’t broken
but simply unfinished
We the successors of a country and a time
Where a skinny Black girl
descended from slaves and raised by a single mother
can dream of becoming president
only to find herself reciting for one
And yes we are far from polished
far from pristine
but that doesn’t mean we are
striving to form a union that is perfect
We are striving to forge a union with purpose
To compose a country committed to all cultures, colors, characters and
conditions of man
And so we lift our gazes not to what stands between us
but what stands before us
We close the divide because we know, to put our future first,
we must first put our differences aside
We lay down our arms
so we can reach out our arms
to one another
We seek harm to none and harmony for all
Let the globe, if nothing else, say this is true:
That even as we grieved, we grew
That even as we hurt, we hoped
That even as we tired, we tried
That we’ll forever be tied together, victorious
Not because we will never again know defeat
but because we will never again sow division
Scripture tells us to envision
that everyone shall sit under their own vine and fig tree
And no one shall make them afraid
If we’re to live up to our own time
Then victory won’t lie in the blade
But in all the bridges we’ve made
That is the promise to glade
The hill we climb
If only we dare
It’s because being American is more than a pride we inherit,
it’s the past we step into
and how we repair it
We’ve seen a force that would shatter our nation
rather than share it
Would destroy our country if it meant delaying democracy
And this effort very nearly succeeded
But while democracy can be periodically delayed
it can never be permanently defeated
In this truth
in this faith we trust
For while we have our eyes on the future
history has its eyes on us
This is the era of just redemption
We feared at its inception
We did not feel prepared to be the heirs
of such a terrifying hour
but within it we found the power
to author a new chapter
To offer hope and laughter to ourselves
So while once we asked,
how could we possibly prevail over catastrophe?
Now we assert
How could catastrophe possibly prevail over us?
We will not march back to what was
but move to what shall be
A country that is bruised but whole,
benevolent but bold,
fierce and free
We will not be turned around
or interrupted by intimidation
because we know our inaction and inertia
will be the inheritance of the next generation
Our blunders become their burdens
But one thing is certain:
If we merge mercy with might,
and might with right,
then love becomes our legacy
and change our children’s birthright
So let us leave behind a country
better than the one we were left with
Every breath from my bronze-pounded chest,
we will raise this wounded world into a wondrous one
We will rise from the gold-limbed hills of the west,
we will rise from the windswept northeast
where our forefathers first realized revolution
We will rise from the lake-rimmed cities of the midwestern states,
we will rise from the sunbaked south
We will rebuild, reconcile and recover
and every known nook of our nation and
every corner called our country,
our people diverse and beautiful will emerge,
battered and beautiful
When day comes we step out of the shade,
aflame and unafraid
The new dawn blooms as we free it
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it
If only we’re brave enough to be it

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed