O’Connor and Swift on the Death of Others

Flannery O’Connor

Friday

While losing my mother at 96 is definitely not like Julian losing his mother in Flannery O’Connor’s “All That Rises Must Converge,” I can relate somewhat to his feelings of being adrift once she is gone. In his case, he is entirely dependent upon her, and embarrassed by her, and resentful of his inability to break away from her. Thus, when she dies suddenly after they descend from a bus, he finds himself launched into an unknown world:

Stunned, he let her go and she lurched forward again, walking as if one leg were shorter than the other. A tide of darkness seemed to be sweeping her from him. “Mother!” he cried. “Darling, sweetheart, wait!” Crumpling, she fell to the pavement. He dashed forward and fell at her side, crying, “Mamma, Mamma!” He turned her over. Her face was fiercely distorted. One eye, large and staring, moved slightly to the left as if it had become unmoored. The other remained fixed on him, raked his face again, found nothing and closed.

“Wait here, wait here!” he cried and jumped up and began to run for help toward a cluster of lights he saw in the distance ahead of him. “Help, help!” he shouted, but his voice was thin, scarcely a thread of sound. The lights drifted farther away the faster he ran and his feet moved numbly as if they carried him nowhere. The tide of darkness seemed to sweep him back to her, postponing from moment to moment his entry into the world of guilt and sorrow.

O’Connor’s commitment to minute detail makes the death particularly unsettling, an instance of her Southern Gothic style. That captures Julian’s feelings in the moment. But they are then replaced by his horrified realization that, from this moment on, he is entirely on his own.

Or at least he will realize this once the initial shock dissipates.

Not having Julian’s love-hate relationship, I am not thrown off as much by my mother’s own death. Nevertheless, I have the an unnerving feeling that my buffer is gone. As long as a parent is still alive, it’s as though he or she is running interference, like a blocking lineman for the quarterback. Sooner or later, we’re all going to be sacked, but it appears that the sack will come more suddenly when the person in front of you goes down.

Jonathan Swift captures this situation in “Verses on the Death of Dr. Swift,” one of the 18th century’s most remarkable poems. Imagining what people will say about him when he is on his deathbed, and then when he has died, Swift thinks that most will shrug it off fairly rapidly. For instance, here he is imagining himself the subject of gossip at the card table:

My female friends, whose tender hearts
Have better learn’d to act their parts,
Receive the news in doleful dumps:
“The Dean is dead: (and what is trumps?)
Then, Lord have mercy on his soul!
(Ladies, I’ll venture for the vole.)
Six deans, they say, must bear the pall:
(I wish I knew what king to call.)

Even his special friends won’t mourn too long:

Here shift the scene, to represent
How those I love my death lament.
Poor Pope will grieve a month, and Gay
A week, and Arbuthnot a day.

       St. John himself will scarce forbear
To bite his pen, and drop a tear.
The rest will give a shrug, and cry,
“I’m sorry—but we all must die!”
Indifference, clad in Wisdom’s guise,
All fortitude of mind supplies…

There is one group of people who will sincerely grieve, however—and it is those who, like me, feel that they have just lost their buffer against death:

The fools, my juniors by a year,
Are tortur’d with suspense and fear;
Who wisely thought my age a screen,
When death approach’d, to stand between:
The screen remov’d, their hearts are trembling;
They mourn for me without dissembling.

Or as Gerald Manley Hopkins, in “Spring and Fall,” explains to a grieving Margaret, “It is Margaret you mourn for.”

Swift’s satiric point is that people will never feel as sorry for us as we feel sorry for ourselves, which I suppose is true. Julian may seem distraught over his mother’s death, but it is unclear whether the death upsets him as much as the fact that he is now on his own—which means, among other things, that he will have to find a job.

In my own case, I think I just take it for granted that we move somewhat quickly beyond the deaths of others, just as people will one day move more or less quickly beyond mine. It took me months before I was able to do so with my child, but in the end I realized that life needed me more than he did. The same is true with my mother and, because she was old, the acceptance comes much more quickly.

In any event, it’s important to have ritual to honor those we loved and to bring closure to their lives. Furthermore, they are never entirely gone but return in a wide range of memories. At the moment, I’m just grateful that I had as many years with Phoebe Bates as I did.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

On Telling the Homeless to “Move On”

Illus. from Bleak House

Thursday

Listening to Dickens’s handling of the orphan boy Jo in Bleak House during our trip to Maine, I can’t help but apply it to the way that we treat immigrants at our borders or the homeless at home. We want them “out of sight, out of mind” and deputize law enforcement to make this happen.

It’s a centuries-old problem, as I learned when I took a Tudor England history class in college and learned about “the wandering poor.” We’re going to see much more wandering in the decades to come as extreme climate events disrupt whole populations while autocrats indulge in ruinous foreign wars and domestic crackdowns. Dickens gives us a close-up picture of one such person affected.

Jo is a poor and illiterate boy who sweeps the street every day for whatever pennies people will give him and then goes home to a wretched crawlspace in Tom-All-Alone’s, the poorest part of London. Though his actions hurt no one, those responsible for “public decency” insist that he “move on”:

Mr. Snagsby descends and finds the two ‘prentices intently contemplating a police constable, who holds a ragged boy by the arm.

“Why, bless my heart,” says Mr. Snagsby, “what’s the matter!”

“This boy,” says the constable, “although he’s repeatedly told to, won’t move on—”

“I’m always a-moving on, sar,” cries the boy, wiping away his grimy tears with his arm. “I’ve always been a-moving and a-moving on, ever since I was born. Where can I possibly move to, sir, more nor I do move!”

“He won’t move on,” says the constable calmly, with a slight professional hitch of his neck involving its better settlement in his stiff stock, “although he has been repeatedly cautioned, and therefore I am obliged to take him into custody. He’s as obstinate a young gonoph [pickpocket or thief] as I know. He WON’T move on.”

“Oh, my eye! Where can I move to!” cries the boy, clutching quite desperately at his hair and beating his bare feet upon the floor of Mr. Snagsby’s passage.

“Don’t you come none of that or I shall make blessed short work of you!” says the constable, giving him a passionless shake. “My instructions are that you are to move on. I have told you so five hundred times.”

“But where?” cries the boy.

“Well! Really, constable, you know,” says Mr. Snagsby wistfully, and coughing behind his hand his cough of great perplexity and doubt, “really, that does seem a question. Where, you know?”

“My instructions don’t go to that,” replies the constable. “My instructions are that this boy is to move on.”

Dickens at this point intervenes to deliver one of his characteristic lectures, lambasting Parliament for its failure to devise social solutions:

Do you hear, Jo? It is nothing to you or to anyone else that the great lights of the parliamentary sky have failed for some few years in this business to set you the example of moving on. The one grand recipe remains for you—the profound philosophical prescription—the be-all and the end-all of your strange existence upon earth. Move on!

Then Dickens makes a contrast between “move on” and “move off.” I think (but am not sure) that “moving off” would require some kind of policy prescription—as in “move off to ____.” As Dickens notes,

You are by no means to move off, Jo, for the great lights can’t at all agree about that. Move on!

From this perspective, I suppose it is to his credit that Donald Trump yesterday proposed a concrete solution, even though one that calls for forcible removal—which is to say, a crime against humanity. As Yahoo News reports, his own phrase is “move out”:

Donald Trump said homeless people should be forcibly removed from urban centers and moved to purpose-built camps on the outskirts of major United States cities during a speech at the America First Policy Institute’s summit in Washington this week.

“You have to move people out,” Mr Trump told an audience during his keynote address at Tuesday’s summit.

As Trump sees it, the homeless should be moved out—or off—to “large parcels of inexpensive land in the outer reaches of the city.” And then, to make his idea slightly more palatable, he recommends housing them in “thousands and thousands of high-quality tents.”

Given GOP parsimony when it comes to the poor, I wouldn’t bet on high quality anything. The idea of cleansing our cities by forcibly relocating undesirables to internal refugee or concentration camps, however, is perfectly consistent with authoritarian thinking.

Towards the end of the novel, the constant moving on finally ends in Jo’s death, leading to a Dickensian denunciation, complete with savage sarcasm:

Dead, your Majesty. Dead, my lords and gentlemen. Dead, right reverends and wrong reverends of every order. Dead, men and women, born with heavenly compassion in your hearts. And dying thus around us every day.

But at least in the grave where Jo asks to be buried—next to a poor scrivener who was kind to him—he will be out of sight, out of mind.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Returning at Last with Weary Feet

Freeman as Bilbo returning home

Wednesday

Updated from a May, 19, 2019 post

Julia and I have just returned home from a Maine reunion, where we joined relatives to bury some of my mother’s ashes. As in the past, when I’ve returned after a full day on the road, I lack the energy to write a new post and so repurpose an old essay on the poem that Bilbo chants as he nears the shire.

When I went to Wikipedia to find “The Road Goes Ever On and On,” I discovered that there are three versions. The first one alludes to many of the adventures in The Hobbit:

Roads go ever ever on
 Under cloud and under star,
 Yet feet that wandering have gone
 Turn at last to home afar.
 Eyes that fire and sword have seen
 And horror in the halls of stone
 Look at last on meadows green
 And trees and hills they long have known.

“Fire and sword” and “horror in the halls of stone” may well be oblique references to Tolkien’s World War I experiences in the trenches. Imagine what it must have meant to him to come home to England’s meadows, trees, and hills.

I like the way the other two versions capture the different feelings one has, first when one embarks on a journey and then when one comes to the journey’s end. The first poem, as the Wikipedia article notes, talks of eager feet while the second of weary feet. Right now, like many travelers reaching the end of their journeys, I’m experiencing weary feet. The first poem is spoken by Bilbo as he sets off for Rivendell in the third chapter of Fellowship of the Ring. The second is spoken by Bilbo in Rivendell in The Return of the King after Frodo and the others return from the ring quest, weary and in shock. I’ve labeled them “before” and “after.”

Before:

The Road goes ever on and on
 Down from the door where it began.
 Now far ahead the Road has gone,
 And I must follow, if I can,
 Pursuing it with eager feet,
 Until it joins some larger way
 Where many paths and errands meet.
 And whither then? I cannot say.

After:

The Road goes ever on and on
 Out from the door where it began.
 Now far ahead the Road has gone,
 Let others follow it who can!
 Let them a journey new begin,
 But I at last with weary feet
 Will turn towards the lighted inn,
 My evening-rest and sleep to meet.

I can report my meeting with evening-rest and sleep went very well.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments closed

Cut the Heat, Plow Through It

Matisse, The Sea Seen from Collioure

Tuesday

We’re on our way back from Maine, where temperatures uncharacteristically soared into the upper 90s—and this is mild compared to many parts of the world, which saw triple digit numbers (or numbers over 37.7 C) on their thermometers. Climate change, global warming, and extreme weather events are all alive and well.

Here’s a heat poem by H.D. (a.k.a. Hilda Doolittle) to capture the experience. Overwhelmed by the temperature, she begs the wind to rip the heat apart. The air is so thick, she says, that fruit cannot drop. In other words, it blunts and suffocates everything.

In the final stanza, she imagines cutting through heat like a plough. Heat this intense, she indicates, has the thickness of earth.

Or maybe she imagines herself as Moses cutting through the Red Sea. In any event, she conjures up violent fantasies of relief.

Heat
By H.D.

O wind, rend open the heat,
cut apart the heat,
rend it to tatters.

Fruit cannot drop
through this thick air–
fruit cannot fall into heat
that presses up and blunts
the points of pears
and rounds the grapes.

Cut the heat–
plough through it,
turning it on either side
of your path.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Donald Trump Is Our Harold Skimpole

Nathaniel Parker as Harold Skimpole

Monday

We’ve been listening to Charles Dickens’s Bleak House on our trip to Maine and that, combined with the January 6 Investigation Committee wrapping up its current set of hearings, lead me to associate Donald Trump with Harold Skimpole, one of the more disagreeable characters I’ve encountered in a while. At issue with both men is their utter lack of accountability.

Skimpole is a mildly talented artist who leeches off his friends, including the benevolent John Jardyce. He explains that he is an innocent child and therefore cannot be expected to be responsible. In the following passage, for instance, we see him answer a question about principle—or rather, his own lack of principles. The question is how he can leech from both parties in a dispute, to which, “in his gayest manner and with his most ingenuous smile,” he replies,

Upon my life I have not the least idea! I don’t know what it is you call by that name, or where it is, or who possesses it. If you possess it and find it comfortable, I am quite delighted and congratulate you heartily. But I know nothing about it, I assure you; for I am a mere child, and I lay no claim to it, and I don’t want it!

At one point he employs such reasoning to deny offering assistance to homeless orphan Joe:

“You had better turn him out,” said Mr. Skimpole.

“What do you mean?” inquired my guardian, almost sternly.

“My dear Jarndyce,” said Mr. Skimpole, “you know what I am: I am a child. Be cross to me if I deserve it. But I have a constitutional objection to this sort of thing. I always had, when I was a medical man. He’s not safe, you know. There’s a very bad sort of fever about him.”

Mr. Skimpole had retreated from the hall to the drawing-room again and said this in his airy way, seated on the music-stool as we stood by.

“You’ll say it’s childish,” observed Mr. Skimpole, looking gaily at us. “Well, I dare say it may be; but I AM a child, and I never pretend to be anything else. If you put him out in the road, you only put him where he was before. He will be no worse off than he was, you know. Even make him better off, if you like. Give him sixpence, or five shillings, or five pound ten—you are arithmeticians, and I am not—and get rid of him!”

“And what is he to do then?” asked my guardian.

“Upon my life,” said Mr. Skimpole, shrugging his shoulders with his engaging smile, “I have not the least idea what he is to do then. But I have no doubt he’ll do it.”

Now to an important observation by Liz Cheney in the January 6 hearings. She offered it to counter those arguing that Trump’s advisors, not Trump himself, should be held responsible for the attempted coup:

 “In this version the president was, quote, poorly served by these outside advisors,” she said. “The strategy is to blame people his advisors called, quote, ‘the crazies’ for what Donald Trump did.”

“This of course is nonsense,” she said. “President Trump is a 76-year-old man. He is not an impressionable child. Just like everyone else in our country, he is responsible for his own actions and his own choices.”

Far too many have used the Skimpole excuse for Trump, holding him to a lower standard because he behaves like a spoiled child. If he indeed thought that he won the election, they say, is he wrong to have attempted to reverse the results?

Bucket, the always hovering detective in Bleak House, has witnessed a number of Skimpoles and Trumps. As he notes to Esther Summerson, people who use the child excuse are remarkably good at getting money out of people:

Now, Miss Summerson, I’ll give you a piece of advice that your husband will find useful when you are happily married and have got a family about you. Whenever a person says to you that they are as innocent as can be in all concerning money, look well after your own money, for they are dead certain to collar it if they can. Whenever a person proclaims to you ‘In worldly matters I’m a child,’ you consider that that person is only a-crying off from being held accountable and that you have got that person’s number, and it’s Number One. Now, I am not a poetical man myself, except in a vocal way when it goes round a company, but I’m a practical one, and that’s my experience. So’s this rule. Fast and loose in one thing, fast and loose in everything. I never knew it fail. No more will you. Nor no one.

Donald Trump is fast and loose in everything, and it has proved to be a devastatingly effective way of prying money out of people—and of avoiding responsibility for his actions.

I haven’t yet finished Bleak House and so don’t know whether Skimpole is ever held to account for his irresponsible behavior. It doesn’t help, just as it doesn’t with Trump, that he has enablers. Chief among these is the benevolent John Jarndyce, who bails him out time and again. Trump’s enablers are not so beneficent but, over and over, they have allowed him to escape the consequences of his actions.

Unfortunately, as with Trump, others are harmed by Skimpole’s self-absorbed behavior. He graciously accepts a bribe from the unscrupulous lawyer Vole for an introduction to his acquaintance Richard Carstone. Carstone, who is already at risk of being captured by the unending and ruinous Jarndyce v Jarndyce case, goes on to be held captive by Vole’s empty assurances, with catastrophic consequences.

It’s particularly frustrating to encounter Skimpole at a time when I, like many Americans, hunger for accountability. If someone can get away with inciting an insurrection (not to mention all Trump’s other infractions), then “justice for all” is just an empty catchphrase. I haven’t finished Bleak House and so don’t know if Skimpole is ultimately held to account, and of course we don’t know how the Trump saga will end.

The suspense is intense.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Why Cry for a Soul Set Free?

Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Portrait of Christina Rossetti

Spiritual Sunday

Yesterday we buried my mother’s ashes in the Turner, Maine cemetery, where we still have the cottage that my great grandmother Sarah Ricker built. Siblings, cousins, and spouses gathered, and by daughter-in-law Betsy sang “It Is Well with My Soul” and “Precious Lord.” In August we will have a public memorial in Sewanee, the community to which my mother devoted her life, but this one was just family.

Few poems are more cited at such occasions than Christina Rossetti’s “Let Me Go.” There’s a reason for this. “Why cry for a soul set free?” she asks, and I think of how, at the end, my mother wanted to die. Rossetti writes to console those who have not yet begun “the journey we all must take”—and, of course, to console herself as well.

She leaves us imagining our loved one as “dreaming through the twilight/ That doth not rise nor set.” And then provides us with this excellent advice:

When you are lonely and sick at heart
Go the friends we know.
Laugh at all the things we used to do
Miss me, but let me go.

There was much laughter following the burial. As was only right.

Let Me Go
By Christinia Rossetti

When I come to the end of the road
And the sun has set for me
I want no rites in a gloom filled room
Why cry for a soul set free?

Miss me a little, but not for long
And not with your head bowed low
Remember the love that once we shared
Miss me, but let me go.

For this is a journey we all must take
And each must go alone.
It’s all part of the master plan
A step on the road to home.

When you are lonely and sick at heart
Go the friends we know.
Laugh at all the things we used to do
Miss me, but let me go.

When I am dead my dearest
Sing no sad songs for me
Plant thou no roses at my head
Nor shady cypress tree

Be the green grass above me
With showers and dewdrops wet
And if thou wilt remember
And if thou wilt, forget.

I shall not see the shadows,
I shall not fear the rain;
I shall not hear the nightingale
Sing on as if in pain;

And dreaming through the twilight
That doth not rise nor set,
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments closed

Good Night, Sweet Lady

Sir John Everett Millais, Ophelia

Friday

Because my mother died when she did, we are able to attend the Bates family reunion in our Maine cottage, which we hold every three years. We will bury her ashes tomorrow in the Turner cemetery, next to the ashes of my father.

When we pour them into the ground, I will internally recite a passage from Hamlet that I owe to my mother. The passage appeared in the final issue of the Sewanee Siren, the town newsletter that she founded and that she edited for 18 years. She used Ophelia’s farewell speech to say goodbye to her readers in 1986 and, changing the words from plural to singular, I use them with her now:

Good night, ladies; good night, sweet ladies; good night, good night.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments closed

The World Will End in Fire AND Ice

Wildfires in southwestern France, caused by climate change

Thursday

As Europe sets all-time record temperature highs, I’m updating (but not by much) a post I’ve run in the past. “Some say the world will end in fire,/Some say in ice,” Robert Frost writes in his well-known poem, and it increasingly appears that all these someones are right. The current heat wave, often accompanied by fires, follows terrifying reports of accelerating glacier melt. According to National Geographic three years ago,

Greenland ice sheet is losing mass about six times faster than it was just a few decades ago, whatever tenuous balance that existed before long since upended. Between 2005 and 2016, melt from the ice sheet was the single largest contributor to sea level rise worldwide, though Antarctica may overtake it soon.

Within the past 50 years, the ice sheet has already shed enough to add about half an inch of water to the world’s oceans, and that number is increasing precipitously as the planet heats. During this summer’s extreme heat wave that parked over Greenland for a week and turned over half its surface ice to slush, meltwater equivalent to over 4 million swimming pools sloughed into the ocean in a single day. Over the month of July, enough melt poured into the ocean to bump sea levels up by an easily measurable half a millimeter.

Frost, who may have Milton’s hot hell and Dante’s cold hell in mind, is writing about relationships, not climate change. As he sees it, the relationship is in trouble whether the partners are fiery passionate or icy cold. Fire is louder and more flamboyant, but the silent workings of cold can be just as deadly:

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.

The poem is just as relevant to our current situation, however, where apocalypse is looking increasingly likely.

Speaking of apocalyptic accounts that get at our situation, I have cited two other works in this regard, Homer’s Iliad and C. S. Lewis’s Last Battle. I wrote the following about the Iliad in August 2019 in conjunction with the burning of the Amazon rainforests:

My anger finds some articulation in a horrific scene in The Iliad. Because Hector has killed his dearest friend, Achilles reengages in the war and goes on a killing spree so bloody that the River Scamander reacts in horror. When Achilles clogs its channels with dead Trojans, it rises up in a giant wave and bears down on the Greek warrior.

Because Achilles is beloved by the Gods, however, the iron-working god Hephaistos enters the fray, and his technology is brought to bear. I think of the Amazon’s unparalleled biological diversity as I read what happens next:

                 Then against the river
Hephaistos turned his bright flame, and the elms
and tamarisks and willows burned away,
with all the clover, galingale, and rushes
plentiful along the winding streams.
Then eels and fish, in backwaters, in currents,
wriggled here and there at the scalding breath
of torrid blasts from the great smith, Hephaistos…

And further on:

[The river] spoke in steam, and
his clear current seethed,
the way a caldron whipped by a white-hot fire
boils with a well-fed hog’s abundant fat
that spatters all the rim, as dry split wood
turns ash beneath it. So his currents, fanned
by fire, seethed, and the river would not flow
but came to a halt, tormented by the gale
of fire from the heavenly smith, Hephaistos.

This isn’t the only time that Achilles is associated with devastating fire. In an earlier passage, Homer uses fire imagery to capture his slaughter:

                               A forest fire will rage
through deep glens of a mountain, crackling dry
from summer heat, and coppices blaze up
in every quarter as wind whips the flame:
so Akhilleus flashed to right and left
like a wild god, trampling the men he killed
and black earth ran with blood. As when a countryman
yokes oxen with broad brows to tread out barley
on a well-bedded threshing floor, and quickly
the grain is husked under the bellowing beasts:
The sharp-hooved horses of Akhilleus just so
crushed dead men and shields. His axle-tree
was splashed with blood, so was his chariot rail,
with drops thrown up by wheels and horses’ hooves.
And Peleus’ son kept riding for his glory,
staining his powerful arms with mire and blood.

Achilles may be Iliad’s hero, but Homer fully intends for us to experience the tragedy of what happens. Once the most humane of the Greeks, as Caroline Alexander points out in her superb book The War that Killed Achilles, Achilles has lost all perspective and grinds to dust everything that is human and sacred: Nature is ravaged, bodies are desecrated, and people’s hearts are torn apart. One can plausibly argue that The Iliad is the world’s greatest anti-war work as it exposes the colossal waste of armed conflict.

The war that today’s humans are waging against nature is occurring on an epic scale and is having epic consequences. Unlike in The Iliad, however, reactive nature will dole out consequences that even heavenly fire cannot resist. Our descendants will curse us for the world we have left them.

***

Now on to sea-level rise. Here’s the passage I cited from the last work in the Narnia series, where Lewis rewrites the Book of Revelation:

At last something white—long, level line of whiteness that gleamed in the light of the standing stars—came moving towards them from the eastern end of the world. A widespread noise broke the silence: first a murmur then a rumble, then a roar. And now they could see what it was that was coming, and how fast it came. It was a foaming wall of water. The sea was rising. In that tree-less world you could see it very well. You could see all the rivers getting wider and the lakes getting larger, and separate lakes joining into one, and valleys turning into new lakes, and hills turning into islands, and then those islands vanishing. And the high moors to their left and the higher mountains to their right crumbled and slipped down with a roar and a splash into the mounting water; and the water came swirling up to the very threshold of the Doorway (but never passed it) so that the foam splashed about Aslan’s forefeet. All now was level water from where they stood to where the waters met the sky.

When fire and ice team up, we’re in trouble like we’ve never seen before. As a character tells Buffy the Vampire Slayer in the popular television series by that name,

When I saw you stop the world from, you know, ending, I just assumed that was a big week for you. It turns out I suddenly find myself needing to know the plural of apocalypse.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Learning about Death through Lit

Wednesday

One of literature’s gifts to humanity is how it allows us to vicariously live through situations that we encounter later in life. Think of it as survival training. Therefore, when I was with my dying mother this past month, scenes from novels and lyrics from poems flooded in, providing me with tools to negotiate the emotional turbulence.

While it is probably over 50 years since I read D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers, one scene above all stands out to me. It’s not surprising that I would remember the death of Paul’s mother since it is the culminating scene in the book. Still, I remember being shaken to the core when I read it then, and, in going back now, I was struck by how close it matched up with our own ordeal. The only difference is that Julia and I did not give my mother a killing dose of morphine when she was in her final days and hours. Under instructions from hospice, however, we did increase the dosage, administering it at those moments (fairly few) when she became agitated.

What I recall about the novel is the agony of Paul and his sister Annie as they await the ending. Gertrude Morel has always been a fighter, and that prolongs the dying.

Early on, the episode captures how mother and son have reversed roles, something which happened with us as well:

“Shall I give you some milk?” he asked.

“A little,” she replied plaintively.

And he would put some water with it, so that it should not nourish her. Yet he loved her more than his own life.

Julia, like Annie, slept next to my mother every night. And my mother, like Gertrude, did “not weep, or even complain much”:

She had morphia every night, and her heart got fitful. Annie slept beside her. Paul would go in in the early morning, when his sister got up. His mother was wasted and almost ashen in the morning with the morphia. Darker and darker grew her eyes, all pupil, with the torture. In the mornings the weariness and ache were too much to bear. Yet she could not—would not—weep, or even complain much.

Also like Gertrude, my mother would ask for the time and the day when she awoke. It was a way of situating herself in a reality that was becoming increasingly murky:

“You slept a bit later this morning, little one,” he would say to her.

“Did I?” she answered, with fretful weariness.

“Yes; it’s nearly eight o’clock.”

He stood looking out of the window. The whole country was bleak and pallid under the snow. Then he felt her pulse. There was a strong stroke and a weak one, like a sound and its echo. That was supposed to betoken the end. She let him feel her wrist, knowing what he wanted.

Here’s a contrast, however. My mother seemed far more willing to die, and while she didn’t talk about moving on, I did. To be sure, I didn’t mention heaven didn’t talk about heaven because neither she nor I find that a compelling metaphor, but I did say that I thought the spirit persists when the body dies—and that, because of that, her spirit would meet up with the spirits of my father and her parents and and her grandson (and my eldest son) Justin. Paul doesn’t ever have deep talks with his mother, which might be part of why she can’t let go. Instead, he looks to the doctor for help:

Sometimes they looked in each other’s eyes. Then they almost seemed to make an agreement. It was almost as if he were agreeing to die also. But she did not consent to die; she would not. Her body was wasted to a fragment of ash. Her eyes were dark and full of torture.

“Can’t you give her something to put an end to it?” he asked the doctor at last.

But the doctor shook his head.

“She can’t last many days now, Mr. Morel,” he said.

My mother had administered to her own mother in her final weeks and believed that my grandmother’s doctor intervened medically, although she doesn’t know for certain. It would simply have entailed increasing the dosage, which is what Paul and his sister ultimately do. First, however, there’s much more suffering for everyone involved:

Paul went indoors.

“I can’t bear it much longer; we shall all go mad,” said Annie.

The two sat down to breakfast.

“Go and sit with her while we have breakfast, Minnie,” said Annie. But the girl was frightened.

And:

Paul went through the country, through the woods, over the snow. He saw the marks of rabbits and birds in the white snow. He wandered miles and miles. A smoky red sunset came on slowly, painfully, lingering. He thought she would die that day. There was a donkey that came up to him over the snow by the wood’s edge, and put its head against him, and walked with him alongside. He put his arms round the donkey’s neck, and stroked his cheeks against his ears.

His mother, silent, was still alive, with her hard mouth gripped grimly, her eyes of dark torture only living.

It was nearing Christmas; there was more snow. Annie and he felt as if they could go on no more. Still her dark eyes were alive. Morel, silent and frightened, obliterated himself. Sometimes he would go into the sick-room and look at her. Then he backed out, bewildered.

She kept her hold on life still.

Eventually Paul and Annie feel compelled to take the fatal last step:

He looked round. Her eyes, like dark bubbles in her face, were looking at him.

“No, my dear,” he said gently. Another fibre seemed to snap in his heart.

That evening he got all the morphia pills there were, and took them downstairs. Carefully he crushed them to powder.

“What are you doing?” said Annie.

“I s’ll put ’em in her night milk.”

Then they both laughed together like two conspiring children. On top of all their horror flicked this little sanity.

His mother, trusting, takes the night milk, even while complaining about the bitterness. Paul lies to her, which is something I tried never to do with my mother, although I understand why he does so:

“It’s a new sleeping draught the doctor gave me for you,” he said. “He thought it would leave you in such a state in the morning.”

“And I hope it won’t,” she said, like a child.

She drank some more of the milk.

“But it is horrid!” she said.

He saw her frail fingers over the cup, her lips making a little move.

“I know—I tasted it,” he said. “But I’ll give you some clean milk afterwards.”

“I think so,” she said, and she went on with the draught. She was obedient to him like a child. He wondered if she knew. He saw her poor wasted throat moving as she drank with difficulty. Then he ran downstairs for more milk. There were no grains in the bottom of the cup.

I particularly relate to Paul’s tenderness towards his mother:

They turned the clothes back. Paul saw his mother like a girl curled up in her flannel nightdress. Quickly they made one half of the bed, moved her, made the other, straightened her nightgown over her small feet, and covered her up.

“There,” said Paul, stroking her softly. “There!—now you’ll sleep.”

“Yes,” she said. “I didn’t think you could do the bed so nicely,” she added, almost gaily. Then she curled up, with her cheek on her hand, her head snugged between her shoulders. Paul put the long thin plait of grey hair over her shoulder and kissed her.

“You’ll sleep, my love,” he said.

“Yes,” she answered trustfully. “Good-night.”

I also relate to how Paul and his sister—Julia and I in our case—felt alone in a dark immensity:

They lingered before the bedroom fire, feeling the night big and black and snowy outside, their two selves alone in the world. At last he went into the next room and went to bed.

He slept almost immediately, but kept waking every now and again. Then he went sound asleep. He started awake at Annie’s whispered, “Paul, Paul!” He saw his sister in her white nightdress, with her long plait of hair down her back, standing in the darkness.

“Yes?” he whispered, sitting up.

“Come and look at her.”

He slipped out of bed. A bud of gas was burning in the sick chamber. His mother lay with her cheek on her hand, curled up as she had gone to sleep. But her mouth had fallen open, and she breathed with great, hoarse breaths, like snoring, and there were long intervals between.

“She’s going!” he whispered.

“Yes,” said Annie.

But Mrs. Morel doesn’t go instantly, just as my mother held out longer than we thought she would.

“Isn’t it awful!” whispered Annie.

He nodded. They sat down again helplessly. Again came the great, snoring breath. Again they hung suspended. Again it was given back, long and harsh. The sound, so irregular, at such wide intervals, sounded through the house. Morel, in his room, slept on. Paul and Annie sat crouched, huddled, motionless. The great snoring sound began again—there was a painful pause while the breath was held—back came the rasping breath. Minute after minute passed. Paul looked at her again, bending low over her.

“She may last like this,” he said.

They were both silent. He looked out of the window, and could faintly discern the snow on the garden.

“You go to my bed,” he said to Annie. “I’ll sit up.”

“No,” she said, “I’ll stop with you.”

“I’d rather you didn’t,” he said.

At last Annie crept out of the room, and he was alone. He hugged himself in his brown blanket, crouched in front of his mother, watching. She looked dreadful, with the bottom jaw fallen back. He watched. Sometimes he thought the great breath would never begin again. He could not bear it—the waiting. Then suddenly, startling him, came the great harsh sound. He mended the fire again, noiselessly. She must not be disturbed. The minutes went by. The night was going, breath by breath. Each time the sound came he felt it wring him, till at last he could not feel so much.

The erratic breathing continues for hours, as it did in our case:

It went on just the same. She lay with her cheek in her hand, her mouth fallen open, and the great, ghastly snores came and went.At ten o’clock nurse came. She looked strange and woebegone.

“Nurse,” cried Paul, “she’ll last like this for days?”

She can’t, Mr. Morel,” said nurse. “She can’t.”

There was a silence.

“Isn’t it dreadful!” wailed the nurse. “Who would have thought she could stand it? Go down now, Mr. Morel, go down.”

And then, at last, relief comes, followed by tenderness:

At last, at about eleven o’clock, he went downstairs and sat in the neighbor’s house. Annie was downstairs also. Nurse and Arthur were upstairs. Paul sat with his head in his hand. Suddenly Annie came flying across the yard crying, half mad:

“Paul—Paul—she’s gone!”

In a second he was back in his own house and upstairs. She lay curled up and still, with her face on her hand, and nurse was wiping her mouth. They all stood back. He kneeled down, and put his face to hers and his arms round her:

“My love—my love—oh, my love!” he whispered again and again. “My love—oh, my love!”

The hospice nurse commented on how she was struck when I did something similar.

But as one must return to the world, in the novel the characters turn to practical concerns:

When he took his face up from his warm, dead mother he went straight downstairs and began blacking his boots.

There was a good deal to do, letters to write, and so on. The doctor came and glanced at her, and sighed.

“Ay—poor thing!” he said, then turned away. “Well, call at the surgery about six for the certificate.”

When I was in college, D. H. Lawrence was my favorite author–so much so that I even included a poem of his (the sexually explicit “Tortoise Shout”) in our wedding ceremony. I’ve moved on from him since but I see some of the same reticence in the Morel household that I experienced growing up in the Bates household.

What is different is that I have become much more open to talking about, and communicating, my emotions. Lawrence helped me with that when I was in college—that’s one reason why I appreciated him so much—and that led me to other authors who trained me in becoming more communicative. I particularly remember receiving useful instruction from novelist Margaret Drabble.

A lifetime spent reading literature, in other words, helped prepare me for dealing with this death.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments closed