Wanted: Poets to Fight Climate Change

Gustave Doré, illus. from Rime of the Ancient Mariner

Thursday

This week I have been look at posts I wrote in 2021 about what I regard as the three major news stories of the year: the continuing Covid pandemic, rising authoritarian movements (including the January 6 insurrection), and (today) climate change. The large number of extreme weather events that we witnessed this past year left few parts of the globe unmarked, from (in the United States) west coast droughts and wildfires to east coast hurricanes to Southwest cold snaps to Midwest and Midsouth tornadoes.

In the following post, which I wrote August 11, 2021, I look at how poets can help us deal with the climate crisis.

Reprinted from August 11, 2021

I continue to write about the Romantic imagination for my book (Better Living through Literature), exploring how the movement helped change the way we see nature. As we deal with the dire consequences of climate change—the recent U.N. report should scare the bejesus out of all of us–I find it useful to review the role that literature can play in spurring us to action.

I’ve visited the issue regularly in this column but I look today at the origins of poetic warnings. The 18th century’s scientific and technological breakthroughs, which allowed allowed humans to control nature in unprecedented ways, also led to a separation. It’s easier to regard Nature as an object of Romantic reflection, after all, when it’s not starving, freezing, or otherwise killing you. Poets picked up on our growing separation from nature early, with William Blake talking of “dark Satanic mills” befouling England’s “green and pleasant land” and Wordsworth lamenting that we are out of tune with nature because “getting and spending we lay waste our powers.”

Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s Rime of the Ancient Mariner is particularly illuminating because it foregrounds the interaction between environmental poet and public. In the poem, an apparently mad prophet enters the scene and tells a compelling story about our alienation from nature. The story is so powerful that the young man he picks out as his audience “cannot choose but hear.”

The Mariner recalls when he himself was young and caught up in the excitement of exploring new lands. In that spirit, he and the crew set out on a journey to the southern hemisphere. This apparent openness to new experience, however, the Mariner contradicted with an act of domination: he gratuitously killed a wandering albatross that the sailors had befriended. Having thereby announced his separation from the natural order, he experienced a spiritual sterility:

Water, water, everywhere,
And all the boards did shrink;
Water, water, everywhere,
Nor any drop to drink.

The very deep did rot: O Christ!
That ever this should be!
Yea, slimy things did crawl with legs
Upon the slimy sea.

Living a nightmarish death-in-life with his heart “as dry as dust,” the Mariner found himself unable to pray. His shipmates, meanwhile, hung the albatross around his neck to punish him, and it functions as a sign of the internal weight he is carrying. He was saved, however, by the sudden realization that he had a kinship with even the foulest of Nature’s creatures. In this transformation, the slimy things became marvelous creatures moving in shining tracks:

Within the shadow of the ship
I watched their rich attire:
Blue, glossy green, and velvet black,
They coiled and swam; and every track
Was a flash of golden fire.

O happy living things! no tongue
Their beauty might declare:
A spring of love gushed from my heart,
And I blessed them unaware:
Sure my kind saint took pity on me,
And I blessed them unaware.

The self-same moment I could pray;
And from my neck so free
The Albatross fell off, and sank
Like lead into the sea.

Having had this epiphany, he feels compelled to share his insight with others:

Since then, at an uncertain hour,
That agony returns:
And till my ghastly tale is told,
This heart within me burns.

I pass, like night, from land to land;
I have strange power of speech;
That moment that his face I see,
I know the man that must hear me:
To him my tale I teach.

In this particular instance, he has chosen a callow youth to hear what he has to say, a member of a wedding party who is intent on drinking and carousing. The Mariner’s message has a Sunday school simplicity to it:

Farewell, farewell! but this I tell
To thee, thou Wedding-Guest!
He prayeth well, who loveth well
Both man and bird and beast.

He prayeth best, who loveth best
All things both great and small;
For the dear God who loveth us,
He made and loveth all.

Were he to deliver the message without the narrative or the poetry, it would fail to impress and we could not expect a change in behavior. It is the poetic imagination that draws the young man and holds him transfixed:

He holds him with his glittering eye—
The Wedding-Guest stood still,
And listens like a three years’ child:
The Mariner hath his will.

The Wedding-Guest sat on a stone:
He cannot choose but hear;
And thus spake on that ancient man,
The bright-eyed Mariner.

We also learn that the Mariner’s story has had an impact:

The Mariner, whose eye is bright,
Whose beard with age is hoar,
Is gone: and now the Wedding-Guest
Turned from the bridegroom’s door.

He went like one that hath been stunned,
And is of sense forlorn:
A sadder and a wiser man,
He rose the morrow morn.

In exploring humans’ relationship with nature, the Romantic poets increased our awareness of what it means to be human. In the rich tradition of nature literature that has followed, along with the exciting field of ecocriticism, our thinking has moved beyond daffodils and storms (Wordsworth, Byron) to what ecocritics call an “earth-centered approach.”

As a result, we no longer makes simple distinctions between the environment and culture, between “the natural” and the human, but examine how they are inextricably linked. If today we have an ever-growing list of authors using the full powers of the imagination to address the challenges of a rapidly changing environment—Wendell Berry, Barbara Kingsolver, and Margaret Atwood come immediately in mind—it’s because poems like Rime of the Ancient Mariner showed the way.

Literature alone won’t save us, of course. In the five-alarm fire we are confronting, we need all hands on deck, civic leaders, scientists, academics, activists, business leaders, military leaders, etc.  The fate of our species hangs in the balance. But poets too have an important role to play, conveying the urgency in ways that other forms of rhetoric may not. May it lead all of us to rise sadder and wiser men and women.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Sadly, “1984” Remains Relevant

Still from 1984

Wednesday

As I look back at important political developments in 2021, the continuing rise of authoritarian governments around the world ranks up there with Covid-19. While the United States experienced the January 6 insurrection and Trump’s continuing takeover of the GOP, countries like Hungary, Turkey, Russia, the Philippines, Nicaragua, China and others experienced strong men attempting to assert their will while silencing their opponents.

In other words, George Orwell’s 1984, written in 1948, remains only too relevant. Here’s the post I wrote about the novel on May 11.

Reprinted from May 11, 2021

Thursday

Tim O’Brien of Bloomberg had a perfect response to a threat the other day from Lindsey Graham, Trump sycophant and senator from South Carolina. He simply tweeted out a passage from George Orwell’s 1984:

Targeting Trump’s opponents, including his Republic opponents, Graham had written,

The people who are trying to erase him are going to wind up getting erased.

To which O’Brien tweeted:

Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped.

Those who most loudly decry “cancel culture” are the most interested in canceling others.

While we’re on the subject of the novel, let’s remind ourselves of one of its most important observations: autocrats lie, not because they expect to be believed, but to test their followers’ loyalty. Donald Trump tested his followers with his 30,500+ lies while president, and now GOP politicians must sign on to the Big Lie about a stolen election (or at least not publicly dispute it) if they want to remain in the party. As Orwell puts it,

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

Orwell would understand well why the GOP is currently attempting to don a populist mantle while, at the same time, opposing labor unions, minimum wage hikes, and higher taxes on the wealthy. Orwell has Stalin’s Soviet Union in mind as he describes the Party’s hypocrisy:

The official ideology abounds with contradictions even when there is no practical reason for them. Thus, the Party rejects and vilifies every principle for which the Socialist movement originally stood, and it chooses to do this in the name of Socialism. It preaches a contempt for the working class unexampled for centuries past, and it dresses its members in a uniform which was at one time peculiar to manual workers and was adopted for that reason. It systematically undermines the solidarity of the family, and it calls its leader by a name which is a direct appeal to the sentiment of family loyalty.

We’re getting such policy incoherence from the GOP across the board at the moment: they are for and against free trade, for and against big deficits, for and against a strong executive, for and against free speech, for and against law and order. It all makes sense, however, if their real aim is power. As Big Brother explains to Winston,

The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from the oligarchies of the past in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just around the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me.

I once remember contending, in a 1984 faculty panel on 1984, that Orwell’s dystopia was no longer relevant. It struck me at the time as hysterical and overly gloomy. I now consider it an indispensable account of how autocracies and autocratic thinking work. Orwell studied Hitler and Stalin and got it right.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Virgil Would Have Understood January 6

Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo, Procession of the Trojan Horse

Tuesday

2021 began tumultuously, of course, with Trump supporters attacking the Capitol in an attempt to stop Vice-President Mike Pence from certifying Joe Biden’s electoral victory. I wrote a number of posts about the insurrection, along with subsequent GOP attempts to perpetuate “the big lie” that the election was stolen. Two essays I wrote drawing on The Aeneid seem particularly on point.

In the first, we see Neptune doing what Trump refused to do, which is stop chaos from happening. Hera, seeking to thwart Aeneas, has sent the god of the winds to destroy the Trojan’s ships. Neptune, who is responsible for the sea, is furious at the chaos and brings the riotous winds to order. Here’s the passage I quoted:

Neptune himself raises them [the Trojan ships] with his trident,
parts the vast quicksand, tempers the flood,
and glides on weightless wheels, over the tops of the waves.
As often, when rebellion breaks out in a great nation,
and the common rabble rage with passion, and soon stones
and fiery torches fly (frenzy supplying weapons),
if they then see a man of great virtue, and weighty service,
they are silent, and stand there listening attentively:
he sways their passions with his words and soothes their hearts:
so all the uproar of the ocean died, as soon as their father,
gazing over the water, carried through the clear sky, wheeled
his horses, and gave them their head, flying behind in his chariot.

Virgil undoubtedly has Rome’s ruler Caesar Augustus in mind when he writes of  “a man of great virtue and weighty service”—which is to say, Trump is no Caesar Augustus. In fact, we are becoming increasingly aware (I wrote this post on May 27) that Trump was acting the role of Hera, stirring up the chaos and then, reluctantly, bringing it to a close only when he realized that it didn’t help him achieve his objectives.

In the other Aeneid application, written June 1, 2021 and reprinted below, I suggest that GOP measures to “protect voting integrity”—which are premised on Trump’s big lie about a stolen election—are a Trojan horse designed to overthrow American democracy.

Three other posts worthy of mention are one comparing Trump to Parolles in Shakespeare’s All’s Well that Ends Well; one comparing Trump supporters undermining free and fair elections to the Telmarines who unfairly intervene in Peter’s fight with Miraz in C. S. Lewis’s Prince Caspian; and one on the exhilaration, described in H. G. Welles’s Invisible Man, of acting with impunity while escaping all accountability. The latter applies not only to Trump but to those confederates who helped plot his coup. They appear to believe they can defy Congressional subpoenas and may be right. After all, unlike those who actually stormed the Capitol, they don’t appear to be under investigation by the Justice Department.

Reprinted from June 1, 2021

It’s unsettling to reread The Aeneid in the months following Donald Trump’s January 6 attempted coup. In Book II we see the Trojans celebrating victory after a ten-year war (the 2020 election campaign felt like it was ten years). After twelve or so hours of euphoria, however, their walls are breached and their city and themselves destroyed.

We who thought democracy had been saved by Joe Biden’s victory have been greeted with a rude shock—first by the January 6 insurrection, then by the 147 Republican Congress members who voted to overturn the election, then by the incessant calls for vote recounts (leading to shady business in Arizona), then by a wave of voter suppression laws, then by the refusal of Republican Congress members to investigate the Capitol attack. In the latest developments, we have Trump’s former national security advisor Michael Flynn calling for a Myanmar-type coup and Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz gesturing towards armed insurrection (this latter at a fascist “America First” rally).

While Flynn and Gaetz—one out of jail only because he was pardoned by Trump and one possibly facing indictment—may seem fringe figures, time and again we have seen the fringe move to the center in today’s Republican Party. Who could have foreseen, for instance, that Congress members who experienced the Capitol attack first hand would now be describing it as “a largely peaceful protest” (Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson) and “a normal tourist visit” (Georgia Rep. Andrew Clyde). No mention of all those killed and injured and all the property damage.

Recounting the fall of Troy to Dido, Aeneas talks about the amazing moment when Trojans discover that the Greeks have (apparently) left:

We thought they’d gone,
Sailing home to Mycenae before the wind,
So Teucer’s town is freed of her long anguish,
Gates thrown wide! And out we go in joy
To see the Dorian campsites, all deserted,
The beach they left behind.
(trans. Robert Fitzgerald)

They also see an immense wooden horse, and debates break out about what to do with it. Some see no danger. Thymoetes, for instance, “shouts/ It should be hauled inside the walls and moored/High on the citadel.” Think of him as West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin, who apparently believes that the Senate Republicans can be reasoned with. For instance, he sees no reason to abolish the filibuster, even though doing so would allow Democrats to pass legislation protecting future elections.

Others warn that the GOP has become a de facto authoritarian party, prepared to trash democracy and establish minority rule. Might these be Virgil’s “wiser heads” who want to do away with the horse?

“Into the sea with it,” they said, “or burn it,”
Build up a bonfire under it,
This trick of the Greeks, a gift no one can trust,
Or cut it open, search the hollow belly!”

One of these is the priest Laocoon, whom the Trojans choose not to believe. Laocoon reminds me of warning us, and being ignored, that January 6 was just a dress rehearsal for what is to come. His words fall on deaf ears:

Men of Troy, what madness has come over you?
Can you believe the enemy truly gone?
A gift from the Danaans, and no ruse?
Is that Ulysses’ way, as you have known him?
…Some crookedness
Is in this thing. Have no faith in the horse!
Whatever it is, even when Greeks bring gifts
I fear them, gifts and all.

Had we only listened to him, Aeneas says, “Troy would stand today—O citadel of Priam, towering still!”

The Trojan optimists breach the city walls so the horse can be dragged in, and they ignore the sound of weapons clanging inside the horse’s belly. They also ignore Cassandra, the seer who is cursed never to have her accurate prophecies believed:

There on the very threshold of the breach
It jarred to a halt four times, four times the arms
In the belly thrown together made a sound—
Yet on we strove unmindful, deaf and blind,
To place the monster on our blessed height.
Then, even then, Cassandra’s lips unsealed
The doom to come: lips by a god’s command
Neer believed or heeded by the Trojans.

Adding credence to the deception is a liar so skillful that he would put Donald Trump to shame. Sinon, who pretends to have escaped his fellow Greeks after they intended to sacrifice him, vouches that the horse is not a trick. Think of him as those Republicans who assure us that they are not actually suppressing the vote but rather working to insure its integrity.

Here’s a taste of what happens next. I choose the scene where Achilles’s son Pyrrhus storms Priam’s palace because it reminds me of the attack on our Capitol. Unlike the Trump insurrectionists, however, Pyrrhus actually “hang[s] Mike Pence”:

Pyrrhus shouldering forward with an axe
Broke down the stony threshold, forced apart
Hinges and brazen door-jambs, and chopped through
One panel of the door, splitting the oak,
To make a window, a great breach. And there
Before their eyes the inner halls lay open,
The courts of Priam and the ancient kings,
With men-at-arms ranked in the vestibule.
From the interior came sounds of weeping,
Pitiful commotion, wails of women
High-pitched, rising in the formal chambers
To ring against the silent golden stars;
And, through the palace, mothers wild with fright
Ran to and fro or clung to doors and kissed them.
Pyrrhus with his father’s brawn stormed on,
No bolts or bars or men availed to stop him:
Under his battering the double doors
Were torn out of their sockets and fell inward.
Sheer force cleared the way: the Greeks broke through
Into the vestibule, cut down the guards,
And made the wide hall seethe with men-at-arms—

Virgil then turns to an epic simile to capture the power of the moment. It brings to the mind Trump supporters swarming up the Capitol walls and pouring into the halls:

A tumult greater than when dykes are burst
And a foaming river, swirling out in flood,
Whelms every parapet and races on
Through fields and over all the lowland plains,
Bearing off pens and cattle.

Our Laocoons and Cassandras are telling us that January 6 was prelude, not finale. Will we listen to them?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

More Time Spent in the Covid Sewers

Harry Baur as Jean Valjean in Les Misérables (1934)

Monday

This week I am reposting my favorite essays on major developments from this past year. Covid-19, of course, once again was a major concern, and this essay applying Victor Hugo’s masterpiece to the pandemic seems even more appropriate now than it did when I ran it originally. That’s because we, like Jean Valjean, thought we were nearing the end of our misery in March. Most of us didn’t foresee the rise of vaccine resistance and two highly infectious variants, delta and omicron—just as the former convict lost in the sewers doesn’t foresee the bars at the end of his journey or Javert waiting to nab him once he gets through.

Valjean, however, experiences a moment of grace at the last moment as Javert violates his training and allows him to escape. Here’s praying that Covid-19 does the same with us.

Reprinted from March 10, 2021

Tuesday, as I was awaiting my first Covid shot (!), I was listening to the scene in Les Misérables where Jean Valjean is groping his way through the sewers of Paris. The elation I felt upon receiving the shot bears some resemblance to what Jean Valjean experiences upon seeing the glimmer of the exit light after his nightmarish trek. In fact, the entire episode is a fitting image for the world’s Covid experience this past year.

Jean Valjean’s first descent into the sewer is as disorienting as the early days of the pandemic:

By degrees, we will admit, a certain horror seized upon him. The gloom which enveloped him penetrated his spirit. He walked in an enigma. This aqueduct of the sewer is formidable; it interlaces in a dizzy fashion. It is a melancholy thing to be caught in this Paris of shadows. Jean Valjean was obliged to find and even to invent his route without seeing it. In this unknown, every step that he risked might be his last. How was he to get out? should he find an issue? should he find it in time? would that colossal subterranean sponge with its stone cavities, allow itself to be penetrated and pierced? should he there encounter some unexpected knot in the darkness? should he arrive at the inextricable and the impassable? would Marius die there of hemorrhage and he of hunger? should they end by both getting lost, and by furnishing two skeletons in a nook of that night? He did not know. He put all these questions to himself without replying to them. The intestines of Paris form a precipice. Like the prophet, he was in the belly of the monster.

When I was 11 and visiting Paris sites with my family, the boat trip we took through the sewers of Paris was a far cry from Jean Valjean’s experience. As he carries the unconscious Marius, he encounters a patrol that fires at him, a rat that bites him, and quicksand that very nearly swallows him up. This final ordeal almost proves too much, even though he manages to escape:

However, although he had not left his life in the fontis, he seemed to have left his strength behind him there. That supreme effort had exhausted him. His lassitude was now such that he was obliged to pause for breath every three or four steps, and lean against the wall. Once he was forced to seat himself on the banquette in order to alter Marius’ position, and he thought that he should have to remain there. But if his vigor was dead, his energy was not. He rose again.

At this point, however, he literally experiences a glimmer of hope. Think of it, perhaps, as the moment we learned that a successful Covid vaccine had been developed:

He walked on desperately, almost fast, proceeded thus for a hundred paces, almost without drawing breath, and suddenly came in contact with the wall. He had reached an elbow of the sewer, and, arriving at the turn with head bent down, he had struck the wall. He raised his eyes, and at the extremity of the vault, far, very far away in front of him, he perceived a light. This time it was not that terrible light; it was good, white light. It was daylight. Jean Valjean saw the outlet.

Despite his extreme fatigue and hunger, Jean Valjean is buoyed up:

A damned soul, who, in the midst of the furnace, should suddenly perceive the outlet of Gehenna, would experience what Jean Valjean felt. It would fly wildly with the stumps of its burned wings towards that radiant portal. Jean Valjean was no longer conscious of fatigue, he no longer felt Marius’ weight, he found his legs once more of steel, he ran rather than walked. 

He is not home free yet, however, as he discovers an impenetrable grating barring his accent. Some governors are also prematurely rejoicing, lifting mask mandates and dropping indoor gathering restrictions:

It certainly was the outlet, but he could not get out.

The arch was closed by a heavy grating, and the grating, which, to all appearance, rarely swung on its rusty hinges, was clamped to its stone jamb by a thick lock, which, red with rust, seemed like an enormous brick. The keyhole could be seen, and the robust latch, deeply sunk in the iron staple. The door was plainly double-locked. It was one of those prison locks which old Paris was so fond of lavishing.

On the other side of the grating is (in our case) prospects of neighborhood July 4th barbecues, visits to grandchildren, and normal Thanksgivings. Jean Valjean imagines escaping both the military patrols that are hunting down revolutionaries and Inspector Javert, who has been dogging his steps for years. Ahead is a return to his beloved adopted daughter Cosette:

Beyond the grating was the open air, the river, the daylight, the shore, very narrow but sufficient for escape. The distant quays, Paris, that gulf in which one so easily hides oneself, the broad horizon, liberty. On the right, downstream, the bridge of Jéna was discernible, on the left, upstream, the bridge of the Invalides; the place would have been a propitious one in which to await the night and to escape. It was one of the most solitary points in Paris…

Fortunately, in an unexpected twist, he escapes the sewers, and life returns to normal, with a heartfelt reunion and a wedding. Our own Paris awaits us, but we must stay patient and disciplined for a few more months.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Awe That Cracks the Heart’s Hardness

Batoni, Sacred heart

Spiritual Sunday

Pastor Sue Schmidt, good friend and long-time contributor to this blog, alerted me to a Denise Levertov poem that, as always with Levertov, manages to find hope in our fallen condition. In “On the Mystery of the Incarnation,” she puzzles over why God should send “the Word” to a creature so arrogant as to believe it, and it only, was created in the image of the creator. Why not send God’s incarnation to something sweet and innocent, like flowers or dolphins?

Of course, we don’t know for sure that God’s hasn’t. We can just know our own species. And because we know, we can marvel that God responds to our arrogance with love. After we’ve witnessed “the worst our kind can do”—and after we’ve shuddered at the knowledge that we share that “taint in our own selves”—our heart’s shell cracks open at the fact that God sends help. God’s compassion is such that, despite our “ugly failure to evolve,” we find ourselves entrusted with God’s human incarnation as a guest and brother. In the words of today’s Gospel reading, the Word was made flesh and sent to dwell among us.

This gift to undeserving humankind takes Levertov’s breath away. It should humble us all. Here’s the poem:

On the Mystery of the Incarnation
By Denise Levertov

It’s when we face for a moment
the worst our kind can do, and shudder to know
the taint in our own selves, that awe
cracks the mind’s shell and enters the heart:
not to a flower, not to a dolphin,
to no innocent form
but to this creature vainly sure
it and no other is god-like, God
(out of compassion for our ugly
failure to evolve) entrusts,
as guest, as brother,
the Word.

And here’s John’s magnificent, and very philosophical, account of the incarnation, which we will hear in church today (John 1:1-18):

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.

He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me. And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

Added note: In her note to me, Sue wrote that, in response to our vain belief that we were made in God’s image, God figured that we needed a new way of seeing that happen. “Hence Jesus,” Sue concludes.

It’s as though God said to us, “You flatter yourselves thinking you are god-like. You boost your ego by assuming that God looks like conquering royalty. But what if God looks like a poor man who dies a criminal’s death on a cross? I await your response.”

Levertov’s response, conveyed through poetry, helps us realize our God potential. Humility, not ego-boosting arrogance, is key.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Angels at Our Bird Feeders

Saturday – Christmas

We waited too long to buy our Christmas tree this year, which meant that our regular greenhouse sold out of trees when I went by. This turned out for the good however, as yesterday I toured my mother’s 18 acres of woods searching for a tree with my Washington, D.C. son, daughter-in-law, and grandson. I think we obtained a white pine although I’m not sure. Anyway it’s wonderfully shaped and is now standing in our living room, complete with lights and ornaments. Finding it ourselves excited 9-year-old Alban no end.

He’s also excited by our bird feeders, especially our cage of suet, which has been attracting hairy and downy woodpeckers, chickadees, and a Carolina wren. Years ago I shared a poem by my father that compared feeders to Christmas trees, with the birds as ornaments. Here it is again. And Merry Christmas.

Slightly amended from a Dec. 16, 2010 post

My father wrote Christmas poems for years, sending them out as the family Christmas card and also publishing them in the Sewanee newspaper, which my mother founded and ran for years. In addition to being a fine poet of light verse, my father was an enthusiastic bird watcher, and the poem below—one of my favorites—combines his passions.

Seemingly straightforward, “The Bird Watcher’s Christmas Dinner” is actually about mystical transformation. Multi-colored birds, drawn to a feeder, turn a cedar into a Christmas tree.   Partaking of a feast that appears miraculously, the birds themselves become a feast for the soul.

The transformation occurs “trysmegistically,” Hermes Trismegistus being an ancient philosopher associated with the Greek messenger of the gods. Hermes moved between heaven and earth, opening up concourse between the mystical and the mundane. The poem describes the birds as angels, and one thinks of the Edmund Sears carol about Christmas angels “bending near the earth to touch their harps of gold.” Here we see angel-like birds “feasting and flying and doing a show/For watchers on the earth below.”

We watchers, struggling through cold, dark days, live in hope that the world will be mystically transformed. “Peace on the earth, good will to men” (and women): that is what midwinter rituals like Christmas are all about.

The Bird Watcher’s Christmas Dinner

By Scott Bates

You can’t exactly call it greed
 When birds at feeders feed and feed
 On endless quantities of seed;

It’s sleeping in the cold all night
 And doing prodigies of flight
 That gives a bird an appetite.

They wait their turns with impatience
 Perched on the cedar by the fence
 Like so many Christmas ornaments,

Cardinal, goldfinch and chickadee,
 Turning it, trismegistically,
 Into an ancient Christmas tree

With angels hurrying to and fro
 Feasting and flying and doing a show
For watchers on the earth below.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

A Trip through My Childhood Reading

Jules Feiffer, illus. from Juster’s Phantom Tollbooth

Friday

The Scott Bates poem I shared in Wednesday’s post provides a good map of the books and poems that my father used to read to me and my brothers.  In case there were any works that you do not recognize, here’s the key:

–Leerie is “The Lamplighter” in Robert Lewis Stevenson’s A Child’s Garden of Verses.

The Phantom Toll Booth is Norton Juster’s witty journey into a word and number wonderland.

–The Cheshire Cat, of course, smiles its smile in Alice in Wonderland

–The “Chimes” is a reference to one of my all-time favorite Christmas stories, Raymond McAlden’s “Why the Chimes Rang.”

–Tom piping up is Mother Goose’s “Tom, Tom, the piper’s son,/Stole a pig and away he run.”  My father read us Mother Goose so many times that not a day goes by that a chance word doesn’t trigger at least one of them.

–As a child I loved hearing my father read Edward’s Lear’s nonsense poetry, including “The Owl and the Pussycat,” “The Pobble that Had No Toes,” and “The Dong with the Luminous Nose.”

–“The Selfish Giant” is Oscar Wilde’s great Christian children’s story.

–Mr. Pickwick from Charles Dickens’ The Pickwick Papers helped establish Christmas as we have come to know it and so is particularly appropriate to this poem.

–The “Meadow Mice” are from one of my favorite chapters in Kenneth Graham’s Wind and the Willows, where Mole and Ratty find their way back to Mole’s old home and have an impromptu Christmas meal with carolers.

–Long John Silver, of course, is Stevenson again (Treasure Island).

Uncle Remus and Br’er Rabbit are from the African American folktales collected and adapted by Joel Chandler Harris.

 –Toby is the gentle Uncle Toby in Tristram Shandy who, like my father, can’t bear to see animals of any kind, even pests, suffer.  (At one point Toby gently releases a fly.) We named our youngest son in part after this Toby. 

–Peggotty and Ham are from Dickens’ David Copperfield while Friday and Scrooge (of course) are from Robinson Crusoe and Christmas Carol.  If Dickens set the stage for our modern Christmas with Pickwick Papers, then he consolidated it with Christmas Carol.  Then he followed that up with a string of other Christmas stories, including The Cricket on the Hearth.

–Sancho Panza, Don Quixote’s sidekick, was the subject of one of my favorite poems by my father, who sees him as matter-of-fact reality at war with the world of the imagination.  In this case, a windmill finds itself deprived of the chance to be a knight:

Let this be my hour
Sancho Panza: my wind is up
my arms are aching for your flour

My battle never has been won
since chivalry’s finest flower
withered in your sun

O gaseous ball: my knight
is gone to the asylum and no one comes
Sancho Panza come and fight

The First Christmas Tree is the Christian conversion story by Henry Van Dyke.

Ladies with their knights could be anyone, starting with the Arthur stories, but I suspect my father particularly had in mind Sir Walter Scott’s Ivanhoe.

–There are many Magic Islands in literature but the one I remember most from my childhood, more even than Treasure Island and Robinson Crusoe, is Johann Wyss’ The Swiss Family Robinson (1812).  All fantasy literature functions as a kind of magic island, and some of the ones that were big in our family when I was growing up were Oz, Never Never Land, and Middle Earth.

–Caves appeared in a number of stories that our father read to us, including “Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves,” “Aladdin,” and “The Scotch Twins” (by Lucy Finch Perkins).

–The Hollow Tree series by Albert Bigelow Paine was popular with children in 1900. There are also magical hollow trees in Peter Pan and The Swiss Family Robinson.

The Jungle Books, and Kipling’s stories in general,were very important to us as children.

The Scottish Highlands my father had in mind were those that appear in Stevenson’s Kidnapped.   In Wednesday’s post I mentioned reading Jane Porter’s 1809 work The Scottish Chiefs late into the night after receiving it for Christmas.

Notice how many of the works are fantasy.  When life was unsatisfactory—and we were witnessing a lot of racial hatred in the 1950’s and early 1960’s—then fantasy was always a place we could go.  It explains why I still go to books for comfort.  My literary fantasies have just become more complex.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments closed

bell hooks Saw Lit’s Liberating Power

bell hooks


Thursday

bell hooks, the noted African American culture critic, feminist, social activist and professor died last week at 69. To honor her, I am running two excerpts from an exchange she had with poet Maya Angelou since, between them, they say much about the importance of literature in the world.

According to her Wikipedia biography, hooks grew up in segregated Kentucky (she was born in 1952), the daughter of a janitor and a maid. She was an avid reader, her favorite authors being poets William Wordsworth, Langston Hughes, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, and Gwendolyn Brooks.

At age 19, at Stanford, she began writing Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism, the work that would make her famous when it was published ten years later.

The exchange between hooks and Angelou occurred in 1998, six years after Angelou delivered her poem “On the Pulse of the Morning” at Bill Clinton’s inauguration. It was moderated by Melvin Mcleod and appeared in the journal Lion’s Roar: Buddhist Wisdom for Our Time.

In one interchange, hooks and Angelou talk about the importance of art in breaking down barriers between people:

bell hooks: In your book of essays, Even the Stars Look Lonesome, you say, “We need art to live fully and to grow healthy.” Talk about that.

Maya Angelou: That’s true. I do believe that art is as important to the human psyche and physical body as air is, as oxygen, as water. And alas, because it’s not something we can quantify reliably, we tend to think art is a luxury.

Art is not a luxury. The artist is so necessary in our lives. The artist explains to us, or at least asks the questions which must be asked. And when there’s a question asked, there’s an answer somewhere. I don’t believe a question can be asked which doesn’t have an answer somewhere in the universe. That’s what the artist is supposed to do, to liberate us from our ignorance.

bell hooks: You’re constantly encouraging people to read, and not just to read your books but to read a wide variety of writers—to read the great white male writers, to read the great African-American writers of both genders. I think that’s a force that we see in everything you’ve done—praise for the power of reading to transform our lives.

Maya Angelou: I remember myself as a young girl in Arkansas in the lynching days of the thirties. One man was lynched in my town and people took pieces of his skin for souvenirs, because he was burned after he was lynched. My grandmother was kind of the mother of the town, mother of the black part of town, and she heard about this and we prayed and prayed and prayed. Every time she’d think about it—”On your knees.”

In the meantime, I was reading Charles Dickens, and Dickens liberated me from hating all whites all the time. I knew that I liked some of these people, because I felt for Oliver, and I felt for Tim. I read the Bronte sisters and I felt for those people. I decided that the people in my town were a different race than the whites on the moors and in the poor people’s homes and in orphanages and prisons. So I was saved from hating all whites, you see.

bell hooks: When I read Wuthering Heights as a working class girl struggling to find herself, an outsider, I felt that Heathcliff was me, you know? He was symbolic to me of a kind of black race: he was outcast, he was not allowed into the center of things. I transposed my own drama of living in the apartheid south onto this world of Wuthering Heights and felt myself in harmony with those characters.

Maya Angelou: Absolutely.

Melvin McLeod: It strikes me you are suggesting that reading is a more powerful way to develop empathy with people of different races or classes or times than even our normal day to day relationships.

bell hooks: Well, this is so because reading requires that you have to use your imagination. When I’m reading Wuthering Heights I have to imagine what Heathcliff looks like, I have to imagine what Katherine is like. I have to imagine and so my mind has to be working.

Because they believe literature has this power, both women decry those who contend that one cannot cross demographic lines:

bell hooks I’m so disturbed when my women students behave as though they can only read women, or black students behave as though they can only read blacks, or white students behave as though they can only identify with a white writer. I think the worst thing that can happen to us is to lose sight of the power of empathy and compassion.

Maya Angelou: Absolutely. Then we become brutes. Then we risk being consumed by brutism….

I will not have my life narrowed down. I will not bow down to somebody else’s whim or to someone else’s ignorance. When I finish lecturing, I find that the whole audience, black and white, is a little bit changed, because I will have recited Sonya Sanchez, Anne Marie Evans, and probably Eugene Redmond, and Amiri Baraka, and Shakespeare and Emerson, and maybe talk about Norman Mailer a little bit, because he writes English, and Joan Didion, who writes this language. People see something. I don’t know how long the change maintains, but if you have changed at all, you’ve changed all, at least for a little while.

I’ll just note that philosopher Martha Nussbaum, fighting a similar fight, arrives at the same conclusion:

But the great contribution literature has to make to the life of the citizen is its ability to wrest from our frequently obtuse and blunted imaginations an acknowledgement of those who are other than ourselves, both in concrete circumstances and even in thought and emotion. As [Ralph] Ellison put it, a work of fiction may contribute “to defeat this national tendency to deny the common humanity shared by my character and those who might happen to read of his experience.” This contribution makes it a key element in higher education.

Never one to avoid a battle, bell hooks spent her career challenging us to open our minds. Her knowledge of literature gave her a powerful base from which to speak.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments closed

Our Christmases Always Involved Books

Knud Erik Larsen, Children Reading by Lamplight

Wednesday

Christmas has come early to the Bates household: I’ve just learned that my two sons and three of my five grandchildren will be visiting us this coming week. Nine-year-old Alban from Washington, D.C. will get to spend time with nine-year-old Esmé and seven-year-old Etta from Buford, Georgia. There will also be tennis and ping-pong and music (Alban on the violin, the girls on the piano). Oh, and lots and lots of reading.

Books have always been an integral part of Bates Christmases. After opening our presents, we would then spend the rest of the day reading them, since they would invariably be books. I remember once being so entranced by Jane Porter’s Scottish Chiefs (the basis for the movie Braveheart) that I spent most of the night reading it.

With this in mind, I share one of my father’s poems about a bookish Christmas. How many of the books can you identify? (I’ll provide the key in tomorrow’s post.)  

A Christmas Carrel

When the students have departed
For a sunny southern beach
Leaving teachers broken-hearted
Without anyone to teach
When the classrooms are deserted
And the halls are cold and blue
Oh the library’s disconcerted
Without anything to do

   Oh the library’s dark and empty
        Like a sock without a shoe

But what’s this Listen Look
There’s a murmur in the stacks
There’s a glimmer in a book
And it’s coming through the cracks
You can hear the Xerox mutter
At the laughter in the stair
All the file cards are a-flutter
There’s a party in the air

There’s a stir in Circulation
        And it’s spreading everywhere

All our friends from all the ages
                Slip out of their printed pages
                Filling all the empty spaces
                With their own familiar faces

Here comes Leerie lighting lanterns
Down the desert aisles
Through the Toll Booth come the Phantoms
Cheshire Cat’s all smiles
Down the chimney Chimes are ringing
Tom pipes up a tune
While on the heart the Cricket’s singing
Hits from Brigadoon

The Owl and the Pussycat are dancing
        In the Reading Room

The Selfish Giant opens castle
Passes out free ale
Mr. Pickwick mixing wassail
Stops to tell a tale
Meadow Mice are singing carols
Ratty cuts the cheese
While Long John Silver rolls out barrels—
Rum from pirate seas!

Uncle Remus and Br’er Rabbit
        Have rum with their black-eyed peas

Now the party’s getting merry
Toby flips his wig
Peggotty and Ham are very
Glad to dance a jig
Friday’s fixing creole gumbo
Scrooge eats goose and glows
Sancho Panza does a rhumba
With the Pobble That Has No Toes

While high on the top of the First Christmas Tree
        Shines the Dong with the Luminous Nose

But all good times must have an ending
Leerie snuffs the lights
Back to storied halls are wending
Ladies with their knights
Back they go to Magic Island
Cave and Hollow Tree
Jungle Book and Scottish Highland
To live adventurously

Until they meet again next year
        In Christmas revelry.

You can get a sense of how fun Christmases were with my father. When I settle down with Alban, Esmé and Etta, I’m sure he’ll be looking over our shoulders and delighting in the stories.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed