Kamala Harris Meets the Fisher King

Perceval Meets the Fisher King

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Friday

My close friend Rebecca Adams recently suggested that there’s a fisher king feel to the transition from Joe Biden to Kamala Harris. The story of a maimed king presiding over a desolate wasteland—and of a knight rising up to save it—is a powerful archetype that has been told and retold over the centuries. Perhaps it is because Harris has tapped into that archetype that she is generating so much energy and excitement.

While the Arthurian narrative may have some explanatory value, however, I hasten to add that Joe Biden is no maimed king. He may be old but he is still proving to be an effective leader, as evidenced by how he engineered yesterday’s remarkable prisoner swap. Although he was 79 when he became America’s president, he has proved to be the most effective Democratic president since Lyndon Johnson, even while working with the tiniest of margins in the House and the Senate.

In short—and despite Donald Trump’s assertions to the contrary—America under Biden’s leadership is no wasteland.

But effective or not, the vibes that Biden set in motion with his poor debate performance—and that were exacerbated by the mainstream media piling on—persuaded many that he is a maimed king. Which is what Perceval encounters in his journey, first meeting the king fishing and later sitting in his bed. Here is that second encounter in Chrétien de Troyes’s version (trans. Burton Raffel):

Seated on a bed, in the middle
Of the hall, he saw a handsome
Knight with grizzled hair,
His head covered by a hat
As dark as a blackberry, wrapped
Like a turban in purple cloth.
And all his clothing was black.
He lay leaning on his elbow…

The king, while he proves to be as gracious as Biden, also must acknowledge his infirmity:

“My friend, don’t be offended
If I don’t rise to give you
Welcome, because I can’t.”
“Don’t speak of it, Sir, in the name
Of Our Lord. I’m not bothered,
God having granted me joy
And health.” With a great effort
The knight sat up as far
As he could: “Come closer, my friend:
Don’t be afraid. Come sit
Quietly at my side. It would make me
Exceedingly happy.”

Later in the story we’ll encounter a spear with a drop of blood at its tip and a grail. Instead of inquiring about these things, Perceval remains silent, and we later learn that his silence has devastating consequences.

Perceval receives the word from a damsel in distress that he encounters after leaving the castle, which has disappeared so that he finds himself in a desolate marsh. The woman informs him that the king, who had been wounded in battle, would have been cured if only Perceval had spoken up. Think of him as a complacent citizen who fails to vote:

You’re Perceval
The Unhappy, the Miserable, the Unfortunate!
Ah, how unlucky you are,
For had you asked those questions
You could have completely cured
The good king of all his wounds:
He would have become entirely
Whole, and ruled as he should.
How much good you’d have done!

The most famous modern use of the story, of course, is T. S. Eliot’s Waste Land. There are multiple references to the fisher king in the poem, including the following:

A rat crept softly through the vegetation
Dragging its slimy belly on the bank
While I was fishing in the dull canal
On a winter evening round behind the gashouse
Musing upon the king my brother’s wreck
And on the king my father’s death before him.
White bodies naked on the low damp ground
And bones cast in a little low dry garret,
Rattled by the rat’s foot only, year to year.

Eliot shows us a land that has been deprived of its vital life force:

What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow
Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man,
You cannot say, or guess, for you know only
A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,
And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,
And the dry stone no sound of water. Only
There is shadow under this red rock,
(Come in under the shadow of this red rock),
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.

There were many experiencing abject fear as the mainstream media and a number of Democrats piled on Biden about his age. Again, I’m not saying that Biden himself was finished. There is a deep humanity in the president that, along with his stellar economic record, would (I believe) have carried him to reelection. (I rely on prognosticators with a good track record, like Christopher Bouzy and Alan Richtman, in making this prediction.) But it’s true there was a wastelandy feel to the election. For many people, it was as though we were witnessing a battle between two maimed kings.

Chrétien died before finishing the story but others stepped up with “continuations,” including some who imagined Perceval returning and becoming the new fisher king, presiding over a rejuvenated wasteland. Kamala Harris, multicultural candidate for a multicultural American future, has activated the archetype.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Trump as Chaucer’s Pardoner

Chaucer’s Pardoner (from the Ellesmere Manuscript)

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Thursday

Yesterday I suggested that, if Kamala Harris is Chaucer’s Wife of Bath, then Donald Trump is the Pardoner. I initially thought of Trump as this character only because he faces off with Alisoun midway through her prologue, but the more I thought about it, the more the comparison fits. As a skilled conman, the Pardoner provides insight into both how Trump regards his own fraudulent schemes and how they can come back to bite him.

Alisoun is a figure so vibrant and full of life that she is positively Shakespearean—and in fact, Chaucer’s characters may have made Shakespeare possible. (For instance, I see resemblances between the Wife and Falstaff, whom Harold Bloom regards as the Bard’s most three-dimensional figure.) The Pardoner, on the other hand, is a creepy and somewhat weird huckster whom other pilgrims put firmly in his place. Chaucer despises him to the same degree that he enjoys Alisoun although, being Chaucer, he also makes him memorable.

The Pardoner sells papal pardons or indulgences, which people could buy in lieu of actually journeying to Rome to see the pope. A pardon was a way of buying your way out of Purgatory for some sin you had committed, and it was a major source of revenue for the Vatican. It was also subject to abuse and became a major target of both Martin Luther (who objected to it on religious grounds) and the German princes who supported Luther (who didn’t like how indulgences were draining large sums out of their principalities). More than a century before Luther triggered the Protestant Reformation, Chaucer was calling out corruption in the church.

Chaucer’s Pardoner is a poster child for this corruption, carrying around fake saint relics in order to help sales. As Chaucer reports,

There was no other pardoner like him.
For in his pouch he had a pillow-case,                 
Which he said was Our Lady’s veil;
He said he had a piece of the sail                 
That Saint Peter had, when he went                 
Upon the sea, until Jesus Christ took him.                 
He had a cross of latten covered with stones,                 
And in a glass container he had pigs’ bones….
And thus, with feigned flattery and tricks,                 
He made fools of the parson and the people.

Like Trump, the Pardoner knows that a distinctive style helps with sales, and like Trump he has flamboyant hair:

This Pardoner had hair as yellow as wax,                 
But smooth it hung as does a clump of flax;                 
By small strands hung such locks as he had,                 
And he spread them over his shoulders;                 
But thin it lay, by strands one by one.                 
But to make an attractive appearance, he wore no hood
For it was trussed up in his knapsack.                 
It seemed to him that he rode in the very latest style;                 
With hair unbound, save for his cap, he rode all bare-headed.

Where he most resembles Trump, however, is in the upfront way he carries out his fraud. When I see him revealing the tricks of his trade to the other pilgrims, I think of the brazen way that Trump all but reveals his tricks to the suckers he takes in (for instance, the “Trump Stakes,” which carried the brand names of whatever store he had bought them from). In the prologue to his tale, the Pardoner reveals his methods to people he will later attempt to sell indulgences to:

First I pronounce from whence I come,                
And then my papal bulls I show, each and every one.                
Our liege lord’s seal on my letter of authorization,                
I show that first, to protect my body,                
So that no man be so bold, neither priest nor clerk,                
To hinder me from doing Christ’s holy work.                
And after that then I tell forth my tales;                
Indulgences of popes and of cardinals,                
Of patriarchs and bishops I show,                
And in Latin I speak a few words,                
With which to add spice to my preaching,                
And to stir them to devotion.                
Then I show forth my long crystal stones,                
Crammed full of rags and of bones —                
Relics they are, as suppose they each one.                

The Pardoner then proceeds to list all the miraculous cures that (so he tells his marks) the indulgences will bring about, everything from their sick animals to getting them into heaven. It’s a profitable business, the Pardoner boasts:

By this trick have I won, year after year,                
An hundred marks since I was pardoner.                
I stand like a clerk in my pulpit,
And when the ignorant people are set down,                
I preach as you have heard before                
And tell a hundred more false tales.

He cheerfully admits to his own hypocrisy: without skipping a beat, he tells his fellow pilgrims how he loves to preach against avarice. This he follows up with a tale—one of Chaucer’s best—about how three men find death in a treasure they chance upon. (They kill each other off.)

And then, thinking that it doesn’t matter that he has revealed himself as a conman, he attempts to sell indulgences to his fellow pilgrims, starting with the host. “How lucky you are to have me with you,” he tells them:

Look what a safeguard is it to you all                
That I happen to be in your fellowship,                
Who can absolve you, both more and less (every one),                
When the soul shall from the body pass.                
I advise that our Host here shall begin,                
For he is most enveloped in sin.                
Come forth, sir Host, and offer first right now,                
And thou shall kiss the relics every one,                
Yea, for a fourpence coin! Unbuckle thy purse right now.

By this point, however, the Pardoner appears to have become blinded by own success, thinking he can sell anything to anyone. These include his fellow pilgrims, to whom earlier he has revealed his trade secrets. Those who enjoy watching Kamala Harris call out Trump out will recognize a similar takedown from the Host. He’s not about to unbuckle his purse:

Thou would make me kiss thine old underpants,                
And swear it was a relic of a saint,                
Though it were stained by thy fundament!                
But, by the cross that Saint Helen found,                
I would I had thy testicles in my hand                
Instead of relics or a container for relics.                
Have them cut off, I will help thee carry them;                
They shall be enshrined in a hog’s turd!

The Pardoner is so angry that he cannot speak, and it takes the Knight, an exemplar of chivalry, to restore peace. The point for our purposes is that, when a fraudster is ripping everyone off, going high won’t necessarily work. These people revel in their hypocrisy and so are impervious to shame.

Sometimes a direct attack, accompanied by choice language and some humor, is the best way to stand up to a bully.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Harris’s Laugh and the Wife of Bath

Trump and Harris

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Wednesday

Among that many things that Donald Trump is attacking Kamala Harris for is her joy. “You can tell a lot by a laugh,” says the man who never laughs, “I call her Laughing Kamala. You ever watch her laugh?… She’s crazy. She’s nuts.”

This from a man who never laughs. As Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson observes,

Think about it: We’ve heard Trump snarl and mock, we’ve seen him smile, but can anyone remember him laughing out loud? I can’t. Kind of weird, no?

A quotation from Margaret Atwood has been making the rounds in response to Republican discomfort with Harris’s laughter. “Men are afraid that women will laugh at them,” the Canadian author has noted. “Women are afraid that men will kill them.”

Or as far as Trump is concerned, women are afraid he will assault them, as we have learned from the 18 who have reported incidents.

But set aside that darkness for the moment and focus on laughter. With Harris’s ascension, Democrats are countering MAGA with MALA, or “Make America Laugh Again.” Harris’s big-laugh personality brings to mind one of my favorite characters in literature, Chaucer’s Alisoun, the Wife of Bath. By contrast, in Trump I see Chaucer’s Pardoner.

[Side note: I’m kicking myself that I didn’t write a post about the Pardoner when Trump was pardoning all his law-breaking friends, including Paul Manafort, Steve Bannon, and Roger Stone.]

Alisoun is in a position not unlike Harris’s, a woman in a man’s domain. She is one of only two women in a group of 31 pilgrims, and unlike the Prioress, who goes out of her way to appear ladylike and dainty, Alisoun lives life with gusto and puts herself forth unapologetically. While the church of the time condemns her for having had five husbands and for not being a tradwife (i.e., docile and submissive), she figures the best defense is an offense and describes how she held the whip hand in her marriages:

I will persevere; I am not fussy.               
In wifehood I will use my instrument               
As freely as my Maker has it sent.               
If I be niggardly, God give me sorrow!               
My husband shall have it both evenings and mornings,               
When it pleases him to come forth and pay his debt.               
A husband I will have — I will not desist
Who shall be both my debtor and my slave,               
And have his suffering also               
Upon his flesh, while I am his wife.               
I have the power during all my life               
Over his own body, and not he.

Now, Harris would not get away with such language in her own campaign, and there are scholars who have argued that Chaucer is tapping into a misogynist stereotype, satirizing her as a sexually crazed woman who devours men. My own view, however, is that Chaucer loves best those pilgrims who are full of life and that Alisoun is his favorite. She is passionate and authentic, which cannot be said of her detractors.

One of these detractors is the Pardoner, who attempts to put her down with a smarmy comment:

“Now, madam,” he said, “by God and by Saint John!               
You are a noble preacher in this case.               
I was about to wed a wife; alas!               
Why should I pay for it so dearly on my flesh?               
Yet would I rather wed no wife this year!”

Not one to back down, Alisoun goes back at him even harder with her version of, “You ain’t heard nothin’ yet”:

  “Wait!” she said, “my tale is not begun.               
Nay, thou shalt drink from another barrel,               
Before I go, which shall taste worse than ale.               
And when I have told thee forth my tale               
Of suffering in marriage,               
Of which I am expert in all my life —               
This is to say, myself have been the whip —
Than may thou choose whether thou will sip               
Of that same barrel that I shall open.”

But for all her outrageous forwardness, Alisoun is looking for one thing above all, something that her society refuses to accord her and which neither Trump nor Vance appear capable of granting to women: R-E-S-P-E-C-T. In the fairy story she tells, what makes for a happy marriage is a husband who listens to his wife and gives her decision-making power, which in turn results in her giving him what he wants.

What she most desires, in other words, is a man who does not define his masculinity by female subordination. It was an unheard-of stance in the 14th century—Chaucer is Shakespearean in his ability to turn her into a three-dimensional character—and his depiction remains fairly radical in certain sections of America’s male population today.

Unlike Alisoun, the Pardoner is creepy and—to use the characterization Democrats are now lobbing at the Trump-Vance ticket—weird. I’ll explore that comparison in tomorrow’s post.

Further note: New Yorker satirist Andy Borowitz, who can laugh, wrote the following imaginary scenario about the GOP ticket:

JD Vance is “completely baffled” as to why a sad, childless woman is so often seen laughing, the Republican VP nominee said on Monday.

“This woman has no children, and science tells us that, if that is the case, she has no reason to laugh,” Vance told supporters at a campaign rally in Michigan.

“It’s almost as if no one told her that stepchildren aren’t real children,” he said.

The Ohio senator said that he and his running mate plan to make the woman’s laughter “the number one issue of this election,” adding, “As long as one woman in America can still laugh, Donald Trump’s work is not finished.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

The Opening Ceremonies Explained

Torch bearer for Olympic ceremonies

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Tuesday

While many viewers were bewildered by some of the opening ceremonies of the Paris Olympics, Washington Post sports writer Sally Jenkins has helped me make sense of them. There’s a literary connection.

Which makes sense given the high value that the French put on literature. I can speak to this from personal experience. I attended a Parisian school when I was 13—my French professor father had a sabbatical—and we spent one hour out of the six memorizing French poetry.

Our school day went from 9-12 and 2-5, with two hours for lunch, and memorization occurred from 11:30-12 and 4:30-5. To this day I can recite poems by Paul Verlaine, Guillaume Apollinaire, and Jean de la Fontaine. Incidentally, to get to and from school involved walking underneath the Eiffel Tower four times a day, so NBC’s shots of the structure have unleashed waves of emotion.

Back to Jenkins, who is the grittiest and least-likely-to-bullshit sports writer that I know. As she sees it, the masked torchbearer was meant to ask the question, “Will the Olympic peace hold?” After all, in a city that has experienced a horrendous act of mass terrorism, the Paris Olympics represent a security nightmare. “Can you hold an urban Olympics,” Jenkins wonders, “amid multiple wars, in a city teeming with contingents from all sides, including some of the largest Jewish and Muslim communities in Europe, at a time when threats have multiplied and perhaps are no longer containable.”

With beach volleyball at the base of the Eiffel Tower, equestrian events at Versailles, and skateboarding at the Place de la Concorde, Jenkins points out that the security complexities are incomprehensible. No amount of surveillance is going to protect spectators and athletes if terrorists take it in their mind to strike. 

It is because of the possibilities for mayhem, Jenkins believes, that the organizers were not willing to deliver up “the usual sugary pageantry.” No “candied and cloying” presentation for them. No “pixies prattling songs about peace in Paris.” No “hackneyed sequences of stuffed-animal mascots dancing with children, and the ever-obligatory chrysalis and butterflies.” Here’s what we got instead:

The Conciergerie, prison to Marie Antoinette, spouted ribbons of blood and red smoke from its windows, while a metal band clanged like iron doors slamming. The subjects of great paintings burst out of the frames to peer like inmates from windows of museums. An armored horsewoman, one part Joan of Arc and one part robot, clattered down the Seine as if charging to battle, bearing — the flag of peace? 

And now for the literary influences. The unknown torchbearer, Jenkins says,

was meant to be an amalgam of French characters and totems: the Man in the Iron Mask from Dumas, the Phantom of the Opera, Ezio from Assassin’s Creed, the wolfishly named thief and master of disguise Arsène Lupin, and Belphegor, or as Victor Hugo described him, Hell’s Ambassador. All of them fugitives from autocratic imprisonment or isolation in deep chambers, ostracized as monsters in belfries and underground cisterns.

Let’s unpack this. Except for Belphegor, who apparently is a demon, all the figures have associations with France’s revolutionary spirit—which is to say, they represent a (sometimes problematic) alternative to the established order.

Alexander Dumas’s The Man in the Iron Mask is the final book in the Three Musketeers series, all of which I read avidly as a boy. The prisoner is Louis XIV’s secret twin brothers, whom the parents have rendered anonymous for fear of the political problems that might arrive later for Louis. And indeed, Athos, Porthos, and Aramis are seeking to rescue him and put him on the throne, which sets them in conflict with the establishment D’Artagnan, now head of the musketeers.

One could say that Phantom of the Opera, originally a 1910 novel by Gaston Leroux but better known from the 1925 Lon Chaney film and the 1986 Andrew Lloyd Webber 1986 musical, has its own revolutionary theme: management does not appreciate the phantom’s musical preferences. And then there’s Arsène Lupin, the Maurice Leblanc creation that many Americans first learned about through the French Netflix series. The gentleman thief, who uses his Sherlock Holmes-level brain to rob from the rich and redistribute among the deserving, has long been a fixture in French cinema.

Ezio is apparently a video game figure from Assassin’s Creed (I had to look this up), a member of a 15th century secret order dedicated to safeguarding peace and freedom. Jenkins also mentions Jean Valjean from Les Misérables, who scales walls, plunges into tunnels, and rescues revolutionaries (one anyway) while being hounded by police inspector Javert. The columnist observes,

France’s literature, music and philosophy are drenched in this stuff — idealists crushed at the barricades, bayed to death by Javert fanatics or head-seeking throngs, driven to dungeons from which they seek to break out into open air. This culture does not lend itself to cloying clichés. There is no escaping the buried truth of it — especially during this Olympics, an exercise taking place right on the cobblestones.

By means of its opening ceremony, Jenkins says, France was telling us,

We’ve had our heads and our hearts broken for thousands of years, but we’ve found our way to civilized culture, because we choose not to hide or dispute our dank past, but to marry it to modernity. We have blood in the deep ancient cracks of our streets and the hidden dungeons where people were manacled in the cistern-seeping dark. Yet despite all those violent epochal fractures, here is our country, at peace enough to host you.

Not exactly a warm and fuzzy welcome. But very French.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Simone Biles Rises

Biles on the vault at the US Gymnastics Championships in 2023

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Tuesday

Poetry is doing some heavy lifting in this year’s Olympic games. Or at least it’s helping uplift the transcendent Simone Biles, who has borrowed the line “And still I rise” from Maya Angelous’s poem and had it tattooed on her collarbone. As she explains,

Before I got this tattoo, it was a saying that I loved. Obvious, Maya Angelou, and I was like “And Still I rise” is perfect because I feel like that’s kind of the epitome of my career and my life story cause I always rise to the occasion and even after all of the traumas and the downfalls, I’ve always risen.

Although unquestionably the greatest gymnast of all time, with multiple twists and turns named after her, Biles faced a torrent of criticism from rightwing haters when she withdrew from some events in the 2020 Olympics four years ago when coming down with a case of the “twisties.” It appears that these detractors take special delight when athletes of color, especially women, don’t live up to the hype. (They also cheered at Megan Rapinoe’s failure in the 2023 World Cup, even though Rapinoe was player of the match, Golden Boot winner, and Golden Ball winner in the 2019 Olympics.) So when Biles talks about rising to the occasion “even after all of the traumas and the downfalls,” she knows what she’s talking about.

Although she’s currently dealing with a calf injury, she is still dazzling the world, and yesterday she led the U.S. team to the next stage of the competition. Here’s the poem:

Still I Rise
By Maya Angelou

You may write me down in history
With your bitter, twisted lies,
You may trod me in the very dirt
But still, like dust, I’ll rise.

Does my sassiness upset you?
Why are you beset with gloom?
’Cause I walk like I’ve got oil wells
Pumping in my living room.
Just like moons and like suns,
With the certainty of tides,
Just like hopes springing high,
Still I’ll rise.

Did you want to see me broken?
Bowed head and lowered eyes?
Shoulders falling down like teardrops,
Weakened by my soulful cries?

Does my haughtiness offend you?
Don’t you take it awful hard
’Cause I laugh like I’ve got gold mines
Diggin’ in my own backyard.

You may shoot me with your words,
You may cut me with your eyes,
You may kill me with your hatefulness,
But still, like air, I’ll rise.

Does my sexiness upset you?
Does it come as a surprise
That I dance like I’ve got diamonds
At the meeting of my thighs?

Out of the huts of history’s shame
I rise
Up from a past that’s rooted in pain
I rise
I’m a black ocean, leaping and wide,
Welling and swelling I bear in the tide.

Leaving behind nights of terror and fear
I rise
Into a daybreak that’s wondrously clear
I rise
Bringing the gifts that my ancestors gave,
I am the dream and the hope of the slave.
I rise
I rise
I rise.

The poem also applies to Kamala Harris, and there are YouTube videos (including this one) that intersperse Angelou reading the poem with shots of the presumptive Democratic nominee. And yes, there are people who are offended by Black women’s sassiness and haughtiness, by their laughter and their dancing. These detractors would indeed like to see broken women:

Did you want to see me broken?
Bowed head and lowered eyes?
Shoulders falling down like teardrops,
Weakened by my soulful cries?

Biles is currently leaving behind her “nights of terror and fear” and, like Angelou’s black ocean, leaping high and wide. And rising like hopes springing high on the floor exercise. And rising like air on the uneven bars. And dancing on the balance beam like she’s got diamonds at the meeting of her thighs.

She rises. She rises. She rises.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

Mouth-Watering Loaves and Fishes

Tintoretto, Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Sunday

Today’s Gospel reading features the only miracle performed by Jesus that appears in all four Gospels (other than the resurrection, of course). Here’s the loaves and fishes account that appears in John, along with a wonderful updated version of it set in Depression America.

First, the passage in John:

Jesus went to the other side of the Sea of Galilee, also called the Sea of Tiberias. A large crowd kept following him, because they saw the signs that he was doing for the sick. Jesus went up the mountain and sat down there with his disciples. Now the Passover, the festival of the Jews, was near. When he looked up and saw a large crowd coming toward him, Jesus said to Philip, “Where are we to buy bread for these people to eat?” He said this to test him, for he himself knew what he was going to do. Philip answered him, “Six months’ wages would not buy enough bread for each of them to get a little.” One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, said to him, “There is a boy here who has five barley loaves and two fish. But what are they among so many people?” Jesus said, “Make the people sit down.” Now there was a great deal of grass in the place; so they sat down, about five thousand in all. Then Jesus took the loaves, and when he had given thanks, he distributed them to those who were seated; so also the fish, as much as they wanted. When they were satisfied, he told his disciples, “Gather up the fragments left over, so that nothing may be lost.” So they gathered them up, and from the fragments of the five barley loaves, left by those who had eaten, they filled twelve baskets. When the people saw the sign that he had done, they began to say, “This is indeed the prophet who is to come into the world.”

And now Liskey’s story of a Depression miracle. I like the poem’s down-to-earth version of purifying and sanctifying incense, symbolic of our prayers rising to the heavens.

Unexpected
By Tom Darin Liskey 

Momma used to say
That when Jesus turned the
Loaves and fish
Into a picnic
For those hungry folks
In the wilderness
The God blessed victuals
Tasted like mouth watering
Mississippi catfish
Deep fried in the best store bought meal
Served with a healthy side helping
Of iron skillet cornbread—
Bread so fine that
No one asked for butter or honey
And nary a crumb hit the ground.
She grew up an orphan
In the Great Depression,
Where low cotton prices
And bad weather
Killed farms and families—
Times, she remembered, so hard
That sometimes even dinner
Was a miracle
And prayers offered
At the evening meal
Wafted in the air
Thick as coal oil smoke
In the fragrance of gratefulness.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments closed

Biden and Harris as Earthsea Characters

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Friday

As I think about the Democrats’ transition from Joe Biden to Kamala Harris, a literary torch-passing novel comes to mind. In Ursula Le Guin’s The Farthest Shore, the third work in her Earthsea series, the young prince Arren finds roles reversed when he must carry his beloved mentor, the archmage Ged, to safety. The novel provides us insights applicable to this year’s election.

By discovering the secret of eternal life, the dark wizard Cob has become the world’s most powerful force, but in doing so he unleashes a blight that robs humanity of magic, song, and story. In response, the revered archmage has enlisted the aid of an untested youth, and together they travel to a shadowy realm between life and death that exists at the end of the world. Ged triumphs over Cob but, in the process, he uses up all his magic, forcing Arren into a leadership role.

Cob has amassed his power by giving the world what it thinks it wants: which is perpetual stasis and no death. But such an existence pulls us out of the cycle of life, with its highs and lows, its beginnings and endings. To deny our participation in nature’s rhythms is to opt for an existence bereft of color and light. Ged and Arren restore the balance by defeating Cob, and in the end Arren proves to be the king of the Western Isles that the fractured world has needed. Ged serves as the bridge to this new order.

Think of Donald Trump and J.D. Vance as the dark wizard Cob in that they are promising their followers a return to 1950s America. This is an America run by straight, white, Christian men in which everyone else (people of color, Jews, Muslims, women, LGBTQ+ folk, workers) accept their subordinate status. Like the shadowy world presided over by Cob, this America lacks the rich diversity that in fact makes up our present reality. Their vision is as monochromatic as the one described by Le Guin, who is talking of a dragon ally that Cob has just killed:

His death did not diminish life. Nor did it diminish him. He is there—there, not here! Here is nothing, dust and shadows. There, he is the earth and sunlight, the leaves of trees, the eagle’s flight. He is alive. And all who ever died, live; they are reborn and have no end, nor will there ever be an end. All, save you. For you would not have death. You lost death, you lost life, in order to save yourself.  

As a bi-racial woman (half Afro-Caribbean, half south Asian) who early embraced same-sex marriage and has her own interracial marriage with a Jewish man and two stepchildren, Kamala Harris taps into the American promise that all should have equal access to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Arren has his own vision of a rejuvenated society in Farthest Shore:

How long has it been, seventeen years or eighteen, since the Ring of the King’s Rune was returned to the Tower of the Kings in Havnor? Things were better for a while then, but now they’re worse than ever. It’s time there was a king again on the throne of Earthsea, to wield the Sign of Peace. People are tired of wars and raids and merchants who overprice and princes who overtax and all the confusion of unruly powers.

The book’s drama lies in how one gets from stasis to renewal. Dark wizard Cob can be seen as Ged’s shadow, the side of us that wants to keep things as they are rather than embrace the uncertain world of change. I myself was rooting for Biden (I trusted those political scientists that predicted he would win) because I feared an uncertain succession. But while most of us like the safety of the familiar, Trump and Vance—with their call to return America to its racist and sexist past—embrace a particularly noxious variant of this desire.

In the final showdown, Ged tells Cob that, in embracing a vision that elevates power over love and darkness over light, he has robbed the world of its richness. Le Guin borrows imagery from T.S. Eliot’s “Hollow Men,” to convey the dead that Cob is keeping alive:

Behind [the man] stood others, all with sad, staring faces. They seemed to speak, but Arren could not hear their words, only a kind of whispering blown away by the west wind.

And later:

[H]e saw the mother and child who had died together, and they were in the dark land together; but the child did not run, nor did it cry, and the mother did not hold it or ever look at it. And those who had died for love passed each other in the streets.

There are no loud Kamala laughs in this world, no boisterous celebrations.

Early in the novel on the gated island of Roke, some of the great wizards in residence refuse to acknowledge the danger. An emergency council meeting is held in which some argue for staying put. One wizard opines that “to raise a great fear on so little a foundation is unneedful. Our power is not threatened only because a few sorcerers have forgotten their spells.” A second wizard agrees:

 Have we not all our powers? Do not the trees of the Grove grow and put forth leaves? Do not the storms of heaven obey our word? Who can fear for the art of wizardry, which is the oldest of the arts of man?

Like Biden, however, Ged realizes that staying the course is not an option and sets out on a quest, surprising everyone with his selection of the young prince as companion. In the end, Arren proves his worth, carrying Ged out of the land of the dead after the wizard has exhausted his powers:

“Thy way, lad,” Ged said in a hoarse whisper. “Help me.”

So they set out up the slopes of dust and scoria into the mountains, Arren helping his companion along as well as he could. It was black dark in the combes and gorges, so that he had to feel the way ahead, and it was hard for him to give Ged support at the same time. Walking was hard, a stumbling matter; but when they had to climb and clamber as the slopes grew steeper, that was harder still. The rocks were rough, burning their hands like molten iron.

Endurance carries them through the ordeal and then a dragon flies them back to the capital city of Havnor, just as an eagle saves Frodo and Sam after they have accomplished their mission. Upon arriving, Arren learns that he is the change the world has been waiting for:

Then [Ged] turned to Arren, who stood tall and slight, in worn clothes, and not wholly steady on his legs from the weariness of the long ride and the bewilderment of all that had passed.
In the sight of them all, Ged knelt to him, down on both knees, and bowed his grey head.

Then he stood up and kissed the young man on the cheek, saying, “When you come to your throne in Havnor, my lord and dear companion, rule long and well.”

Ged here is like Biden, putting the welfare of the world before his own egotistical desires. As the president said in his Wednesday night address, “I revere this office, but I love my country more.”

Returning to our own story, Joe Biden, in 2020, saved the country from an authoritarian grifter with a Christian nationalist following that was threatening to upend the American Constitution and to usher in a vision of America where only straight white Christians have rights. Then, having saved America, Biden engineered a situation in which the antithesis of Donald Trump, a biracial woman who embraces LGBTQ+ and worker protections, would have a chance at succeeding him. We can safely anticipate that on January 6, 2025—like Ged relinquishing his position and returning to the island where he grew up—the president will turn over the keys to his successor and return to his Delaware.

As the Doorkeeper of the wizards’ city puts it, “He has done with doing. He goes home.”

Hopefully our story will also end happily with Arren, not Cob, stepping into executive authority.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

Biden, Macbeth, and Passing the Torch

Biden and Harris


Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Thursday

Following Joe Biden’s address yesterday about why he’s choosing not to run for a second term, some MSNBC commentator—I can’t remember who—cited a line from Macbeth: “Nothing in his life became him like the leaving it.” And indeed, there was something magnificently Shakespearean about a man putting the needs of the country over personal ambition. As he put it,

I believe my record as president, my leadership in the world, my vision for America’s future, all merited a second term,” the president said. “But nothing, nothing, can come in the way of saving our democracy. That includes personal ambition. So, I’ve decided the best way forward is to pass the torch to a new generation. That’s the best way to unite our nation. You know, there is a time and a place for long years of experience in public life. But there’s also a time and a place for new voices, fresh voices, yes, younger voices. And that time and place is now.

And further on:

I revere this office, but I love my country more. It’s been the honor of my life to serve as your president. But in the defense of democracy, which is at stake, I think it’s more important than any title.

The Macbeth passage is not entirely appropriate since it refers to a traitor whom Macbeth has defeated in battle and then executed. Macolm reports to King Duncan on the execution of the Thane of Cawdor:

Malcolm: But I have spoke
With one that saw him die; who did report
That very frankly he confessed his treasons,
Implor’d your Highness’ pardon, and set forth
A deep repentance. Nothing in his life
Became him like the leaving it.

While some in the Democratic party, prior to Biden stepping down, were accusing him of—not treason, exactly—but of putting his ego over the needs of his fellow Democrats, in the end he transcended politics in a George Washington-type moment. To be sure, it’s not true that nothing in his life became him like how he left the presidency—Joe Biden has had many memorable moments in his career—but this is one that will go down in history.

Looking at the play, it’s worth mentioning the man who takes Cawdor down. Macbeth will go on to commit his own act of treason, pulling off a successful coup by murdering Duncan. Trump’s own treasonous coup attempt was unsuccessful, and whether he would have succeeded in defeating Biden in November as Macbeth defeats Cawdor we will never know.

What we do know, however, is that Biden exited with grace and dignity whereas Trump, in January 2020, went down like a screaming and cursing Macbeth:

Macbeth: I will not yield
To kiss the ground before young Malcolm’s feet
And to be baited with the rabble’s curse.
…Before my body
I throw my warlike shield. Lay on, Macduff,
And damned be him that first cries “Hold! Enough!”

The play ends with Malcolm brandishing Macbeth’s head on a pole. Pray that Malcolm bests Macbeth in our own election and that it is not democracy’s head on that pole.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Shakespeare Stood Up for Immigrants

2024 Republican Convention

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Wednesday

With Donald Trump promising “the largest deportation operation in the history of our country” and calling for deportation camps that would hold a million people, we are sure to encounter much immigrant bashing in the upcoming weeks. Recall that Trump sabotaged a bipartisan Senate bill addressing immigration issues earlier this year so as to ensure the issue stayed hot and that delegates to last week’s GOP convention held up signs calling for “Mass Deportation Now.”

With this in mind, I share a Shakespeare passage on immigrants that my friend Russ Heldman alerted me to. It appears in the banned play The Book of Thomas More–written mostly by someone else—and shows More, then a London undersheriff, addressing anti-immigrant rioters.

On May 1, 1517—which became known as Evil May Day—apprentices claiming that foreigners were taking their jobs and changing the culture attacked immigrant residents and looted their houses. These foreigners, who made up around two percent of London’s population, ranged from “Flemish cobblers” to “French royal courtiers.”

No author has ever entered the minds of other people, including the marginalized, as fully as Shakespeare, and in this speech we see a character engaging in this very exercise: to talk down the rioters, Thomas More asks them to put themselves in the immigrants’ shoes.

The passage begins with More asking the rioters to imagine themselves in the place of a king who has sent the immigrants packing. They are to think of themselves “in ruff of your opinions clothed”—in proud majesty—watching these “wretched strangers” heading for the coast:

Grant them removed, and grant that this your noise
Hath chid down all the majesty of England;
Imagine that you see the wretched strangers,
Their babies at their backs and their poor luggage,
Plodding to the ports and coasts for transportation,
And that you sit as kings in your desires,
Authority quite silenced by your brawl,
And you in ruff of your opinions clothed;
What had you got?

More warns that if rioting (“insolence and strong hand”) should win out, then “not one of you should live an aged man.” Anticipating what Thomas Hobbes would write fifty years later (when there is no ruling authority, “every man is Enemy to every man”), More says that the rioters’ violence will boomerang. “Other ruffians,” he warns, will “shark on you and men like ravenous fishes feed on one another”:

I’ll tell you: you had taught
How insolence and strong hand should prevail,
How order should be quelled; and by this pattern
Not one of you should live an aged man,
For other ruffians, as their fancies wrought,
With self same hand, self reason, and self right,
Would shark on you, and men like ravenous fishes
Feed on one another.…

Although a number of the May Day rioters were hanged, Henry VIII pardoned a few at the urging of queen Catherine of Aragorn. More, however, points out that these lucky ones could face an ironic situation, becoming refugee immigrants in their turn:

Alas, alas, say now the King,
As he is clement if th’offender mourn,
Should so much come too short of your great trespass
As but to banish you: whither would you go?
What country, by the nature of your error,
Should give you harbor? Go you to France or Flanders,
To any German province, to Spain or Portugal,
Nay, anywhere that not adheres to England,
Why, you must needs be strangers.

If they indeed become strangers, they will experience the same attacks that they themselves are directing against strangers. Would you want such “mountainish inhumanity” coming your way, he asks:

Would you be pleas’d
To find a nation of such barbarous temper
That breaking out in hideous violence
Would not afford you an abode on earth.
Whet their detested knives against your throats,
Spurn you like dogs, and like as if that God
Owned not nor made not you, nor that the elements
Were not all appropriate to your comforts,
But charter’d unto them? What would you think
To be thus used? This is the strangers’ case
And this your mountainish inhumanity.

In having a character remind us that immigrants are God’s creatures and should not be spurned like dogs, Shakespeare is centuries ahead of his time. Then again, some people want to return to the bad old days.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed