Fighting the Erasure of History

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Friday

Black History Month, which begins tomorrow, takes on a special significance this year given rightwing America’s attempts to erase Black history from our national consciousness. First there was the Air Force removing video materials about the Tuskegee airmen (as well as about women service pilots), although they’ve since been put back in the curriculum following a hew and cry. Now we get word that the Defense Department’s intelligence agency has paused observances of Black History Month, as well as observance of Pride Month, Holocaust Days of Remembrance, and other cultural and historical annual events.

None of this should come as a surprise. For years we’ve seen MAGA go after such works as Ruby Bridges Goes to School and Amanda Gorman’s “The Hill We Climb.” And then there’s the wholesale assault on Toni Morrison that has been underway for decades.

The erasure of history is an ongoing theme of George Orwell’s 1984, which increasingly appears to be describing our reality. The Party’s slogan, “Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past,” appears to have been unofficially adopted by Trump. What he wants is an eternal now in which he defines reality. Or as Winston explains it to Julia, “History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”

I’m struck by the contrast between Orwell’s pessimism about totalitarian regimes reshaping history and poet Lucille Clifton’s optimism that history wields a power unto itself. In “i am accused of tending to the past,” written around 1990, she sees Black history growing up as it remembers faces, names, and dates. “When she is strong enough to travel on her own,” Clifton writes, “beware, she will”:

i am accused of tending to the past
as if i made it,
as if i sculpted it
with my own hands. i did not.
this past was waiting for me
when i came,
a monstrous unnamed baby,
and i with my mother’s itch
took it to breast
and named it
History.
she is more human now,
learning languages everyday,
remembering faces, names and dates.
when she is strong enough to travel
on her own, beware, she will.

I wonder if Clifton regarded Black History Month as being a necessary mother, required to nurture a History not yet strong enough to stand on its own, much less travel. In any event, MAGA appears to heeding Clifton’s threat—“beware, she will”—and is taking every measure to ensure it never grows up. The attacks on DEI have essentially become Jim Crow 2024, an attempt to reinstate our racial caste system following a half century of significant progress. An historical knowledge of what African Americans have endured and how they have resisted and sometimes triumphed is therefore essential.

It is therefore encouraging to learn about instances of Black history being taught in weekend programs—such as this one in Florida—to counteract MAGA assaults on school history curricula. Literature, meanwhile, has its own vital role to play, one that is particularly important given the ability of stories and poems to capture the complexities of race in America. As authors like Clifton, Morrison, Ralph Ellison, James Baldwin, Richard Wright, Alice Walker, Octavia Butler, Maya Angelou, Nikki Giovanni, and all those others make clear, the experience of being Black and White in America is so multidimensional that no single perspective can do it justice. While the Trump administration would certainly like to end an awareness of our tortured history of race, to a certain extent Clifton is right: it’s currently traveling on its own more than it ever has, despite attacks. As one who learned Tennessee history from a segregationist teacher in 1963—Fred Langford barely mentioned slavery—I can see the difference.

Every year on the Sunday nearest Martin Luther King’s birthday, Episcopal churches (and other denominations as well, I suspect) sing James Weldon Johnson’s inspiring “Lift Every Voice and Sing.” You can read the whole song here but for today’s purpose I excerpt the lines referring to Black history:

Sing a song full of the faith that the dark past has taught us,
Sing a song full of the hope that the present has brought us.   
Facing the rising sun of our new day begun,
Let us march on till victory is won.

Stony the road we trod,
Bitter the chastening rod,
Felt in the days when hope unborn had died;   
Yet with a steady beat,
Have not our weary feet
Come to the place for which our fathers sighed?
We have come over a way that with tears has been watered,
We have come, treading our path through the blood of the slaughtered,
Out from the gloomy past,   
Till now we stand at last
Where the white gleam of our bright star is cast.

When confronting renewed attempts at oppression, nothing is more powerful than knowing that one has triumphed over oppression in the past. Only when one succumbs to the timeless present that authoritarians desire does one lose hope and give up.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Blake vs. GOP’s Strict Father Morality

William Blake, “Nobodaddy”

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Thursday

A recent essay drawing on the ideas of linguist and philosopher George Lakoff contends that, once we understand why Donald Trump’s supporters keep calling him “Daddy”–and why they continue to infantilize themselves on national television–we will “hold the key to understanding the psychology of the Republican Party and the cult of Trump.” Reading Gil Duran’s article conjured up for me William Blake’s Nobodaddy.

The examples Duran cites are disturbing and sometimes downright creepy, at least to those not in the Trumpian cult. For instance:

“It’s like daddy arrived, and he’s taking his belt off, you know?” said actor Mel Gibson during a recent interview with Sean Hannity on Fox.

“Daddy’s back!” exclaimed Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida after Trump’s inauguration. “Daddy’s home!” tweeted Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado. “Dad is home,” declared conservative troll Charlie Kirk. “Straighten up sucker, cuz daddy’s home!” sang Kid Rock at Trump’s inauguration party. “Now your daddy’s home,” jeered Roseanne Barr and Tom MacDonald in a bizarre Trump-themed rap song.

Creepiest of all is Tucker Carlson comparing America to a naughty daughter whom Trump needs to spank:

You’ve been a bad girl. You’ve been a bad little girl and you’re getting a vigorous spanking, right now. … It’s going to hurt you a lot more than it hurts me.

Duran is drawing on Lakoff’s concept of “strict father morality,” which the philosopher describes it as follows:

The strict father model begins with a set of assumptions: The world is a dangerous place, and it always will be, because there is evil out there in the world. The world is also difficult because it is competitive. There will always be winners and losers. There is an absolute right and an absolute wrong.

Children are born bad, in the sense that they just want to do what feels good, not what is right. Therefore, they have to be made good. What is needed in this kind of a world is a strong, strict father who can:
• Protect the family in the dangerous world,
• Support the family in the difficult world, and
• Teach his children right from wrong.

What is required of the child is obedience, because the strict father is a moral authority who knows right from wrong. It is further assumed that the only way to teach kids obedience—that is, right from wrong—is through punishment, painful punishment, when they do wrong.

The punishment aimed at kids is also aimed at others, such as immigrants, poor families, and struggling women. It also informs a certain view of Christianity.

 Currently we are seeing two strains of Christianity wrestling for the soul of America, the love-oriented Christianity that Episcopal Bishop Mariann Budde preached the other day and the punishment-oriented Christianity of Trump supporters. It was this latter version of God that Blake attacks in his poetry.

I admit to not understanding much of Blake’s bewildering cosmology, but I instinctively get his aversion to an angry daddy god. Nobodaddy is perhaps a compound word taken from “Old Daddy Nobody.” Some have also suggested that Blake means it to be a close anagram of Abaddon, the “angel of the bottomless pit” who appears in Revelation 9:11 and is mentioned in Job 26:6. According to Blake scholar L. Edwin Folsom, the poet sees this god as a farting and belching “Father of Jealousy” who hides himself in clouds and loves “hanging & drawing & quartering / Every bit as well as war & slaughtering.” At different points in his poetry Blake associates him with Winter, the Will, and the Old Testament God.

If there’s a connection with Revelation’s Abaddon, then he would also be associated with the king of locusts, which supposedly will be released during the apocalypse in order to torture “those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.” In the eyes of some Trump Christians, this includes anyone who votes Democratic.

Here one of Blake’s poems featuring the dark fathernfigure:

To Nobodaddy

Why art thou silent & invisible  
Father of jealousy
Why dost thou hide thyself in clouds  
From every searching Eye

Why darkness & obscurity
In all thy words & laws  
That none dare eat the fruit but from  
The wily serpents jaws  
Or is it because Secrecy
gains females loud applause

When one lives in thrall to such a daddy god, one sees sexuality as a secret and sinful temptation (“wily serpents jaws”)—which helps explain why we regularly hear about MAGA pastors molesting children or committing adultery. Whereas if one sees God as a figure of love, then the world looks very different, as in this poem from Songs of Innocence:

The Shepherd

How sweet is the shepherd’s sweet lot!
From the morn to the evening he strays;
He shall follow his sheep all the day,
And his tongue shall be fillèd with praise.

For he hears the lambs’ innocent call,
And he hears the ewes’ tender reply;
He is watchful while they are in peace,
For they know when their shepherd is nigh.

This is closer to how I raised my own children–listening to their calls, taking them seriously, and replying tenderly–and they have grown into responsible and kind men as well as extraordinary fathers. No belt was needed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Auden on Living in an Age of Anxiety

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Wednesday

As Donald Trump slings around his wrecking ball, targeting such worthy programs as Meals on Wheels, Head Start, school lunches, child-care help, student loans, disaster relief, crime-fighting assistance and Medicaid itself (which provides healthcare to 82 million Americans), we await to see whether anything can pierce the bubble around him. Greg Olear of the Substack blog Prevail asks, “Why do so many Americans still walk around in a fog, oblivious to the swirl of change around them, ignorant of the ill intent of the oligarchs, in denial about the malefic character of our once and current President?”

If Trump’s monumental bungling of a plague failed to wake people up, he wonders, will anything? Are Trump supporters “capable of admitting they’d been had?”

I wrote on this subject this past Monday, citing a passage from George Eliot’s Silas Marner about living in denial. Olear suggests another passage that applies, this one from W.H. Auden’s long poem The Age of Anxiety.

Before giving it to you, however, let me first quote from the poem that serves as its preamble. In “September 1, 1939,” written about the start of World War II, Auden writes,

I sit in one of the dives
On Fifty-second Street
Uncertain and afraid
As the clever hopes expire
Of a low dishonest decade:
Waves of anger and fear
Circulate over the bright
And darkened lands of the earth,
Obsessing our private lives;
The unmentionable odor of death
Offends the September night.

The Trump era can certainly be called low and dishonest, with Biden’s four-year interlude ultimately unable to overcome Trumpism’s incessant lying and fearmongering. In Age of Anxiety, written eight years later and reflecting on how fascism got so far, Auden writes,

 We would rather be ruined than changed
We would rather die in our dread
Than climb the cross of the moment
And let our illusions die.

We would rather remain in our illusions—stay stuck in our s**t, as the saying goes—than face up to the truth of our condition. Our dread may make us miserable but it’s familiar. Jesus understood this state of mind and climbed “the cross of the moment” to awaken us. Stepping away from our ruin and embracing real change requires a courage that appears beyond many of us.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Trump Has Let Slip the Lapdogs of War

Charlton Heston as an Antony bent on revenge

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Tuesday

“F**k it: Release ’em all,” Donald Trump reportedly said about the insurrectionists who, at his instigation, stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021, battling with police in a conflict that led to many injuries and several deaths. He has, to borrow from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, cried “havoc” and let slip the dogs of war.

America’s militant right was, needless to say, jubilant at Trump’s decision. Proud Boys’ leader Enrique Tarrio, sentenced to 22 years for seditious conspiracy, declared, “The people who did this, they need to feel the heat, they need to be put behind bars, and they need to be prosecuted.” Oath Keepers leader Stuart Rhodes, sentenced to 18 years for the same, said the prosecutors should be tried for their “crimes.” And the so-called QAnon shaman crowed, “”I got a pardon baby! Thank you President Trump! Now I am gonna buy some motha f***in guns!”

The judge who sentenced Rhodes in 2023 said at the time, “You are smart, you are charismatic and compelling and frankly that’s what makes you dangerous. The moment you are released, whenever that may be, you will be ready to take up arms against your government.” In other words, Trump is well on his way to inspiring a paramilitary to supplement his other powers.

Antony delivers his famous line immediately after Julius Caesar has been assassinated. Seething with feelings of revenge and resentment, he vows that “domestic fury and fierce civil strife shall cumber all the parts of Italy” and that all pity will be “choked with custom of fell deeds.”  Caesar’s spirit, he promises, will come “ranging for revenge” from hot hell and will be accompanied by Átē, the Greek god of moral blindness and ruin:

Over thy wounds now do I prophesy
 (Which like dumb mouths do ope their ruby lips
 To beg the voice and utterance of my tongue)
 A curse shall light upon the limbs of men;
 Domestic fury and fierce civil strife
Shall cumber all the parts of Italy;
 Blood and destruction shall be so in use
 And dreadful objects so familiar
 That mothers shall but smile when they behold
 Their infants quartered with the hands of war,
All pity choked with custom of fell deeds;
 And Caesar’s spirit, ranging for revenge,
 With Ate by his side come hot from hell,
 Shall in these confines with a monarch’s voice
 Cry “Havoc!” and let slip the dogs of war,
That this foul deed shall smell above the earth
 With carrion men groaning for burial.

Trump is no less unhinged than Antony in his desire for retribution against those who tried to hold him accountable. His pardons are one way of expressing this.

And as for the results, we can say—shifting to another Shakespeare play—”Hell is empty and all the devils are here.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

George Eliot Applied to Climate Change

Dunstan Cass stealing Silas Marner’s gold

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Monday

My friend Valerie Hotchkiss, Oberlin’s head librarian, alerted me to a Wall Street Journal letter to the editor applying George Eliot’s Silas Marner to the California wildfires. While I’m grateful to the letter writer for alerting me to the passage, I believe he fails to apply it to the real culprit.

The Rupert Murdoch-owned Journal has fallen in line with Donald Trump in denying the fact of climate change,* and the letter is one of three pieces of writing blaming the extensive fire damage on California bureaucracy. All three insist that the state should have insisted that homeowners do more to prepare for an inevitable cataclysm. The fire devastation, in other words, is the Democrats’ fault, not the Republicans’.

The second letter uses Eliot to explain why Californians failed to prepare. They have been living in denial, Jonathan Schmerling writes, thinking that there’s no reason to adopt special fire prevention measures because they haven’t been victimized by fires in the past. They are like Silas Marner, who is confident that the gold he has hidden away under his floorboards is safe because he has never before been robbed. Here’s the Eliot passage cited by the letter writer:

The sense of security more frequently springs from habit than from conviction, and for this reason it often subsists after such a change in conditions as might have been expected to suggest alarm. The lapse of time during which a given event has not happened is, in this logic of habit, constantly alleged as the reason why the event should never happen, even when the lapse of time is precisely the added condition which makes the event imminent.”

Eliot then provides the following concrete example:

A man will tell you that he has worked in a mine for forty years unhurt by an accident as a reason why he should apprehend no danger, though the roof is beginning to sink; and it is often observable, that the older a man gets, the more difficult it is to him to retain a believing conception of his own death. This influence of habit was necessarily strong in a man whose life was so monotonous as Marner’s—who saw no new people and heard of no new events to keep alive in him the idea of the unexpected and the changeful; and it explains simply enough, why his mind could be at ease, though he had left his house and his treasure more defenseless than usual. 

Schmerling sententiously concludes his letter,

When the fire-ravaged communities rebuild, perhaps Eliot’s warning will be heeded by both the public and private sectors to ensure that the complacency Mr. Dittrich exposes, which inexorably led to the current calamity, doesn’t again take hold.

Now, it may be true that Californians should have taken more measures to protect their homes against fires. In that way the editorial and the letter writers may have a point. We could also say that homeowners living on the Atlantic and Gulf coasts could and should do more to protect their homes against hurricanes and sea level rise. But because temperatures are unquestionably rising and storms are unquestionably becoming more frequent and intense, to put most of the blame on complacency rather than on hydrocarbons is like…well, like Silas Marner thinking that his gold will be safe if he hides it better or locks his house. Determined thieves will find their way in, regardless of precautions taken.

The GOP these days would like to blame the victim rather than address the problem when it comes to climate change, pandemics, political violence, growing income inequality, and other ills. Because the catastrophes are happening to other people, they confidently assume that a crisis is not (to use Eliot’s word) imminent. They believe that they will remain untouched.

Or to borrow again from the Eliot passage cited by the Journal letter writer, “The lapse of time during which a given event has not happened is, in this logic of habit, constantly alleged as the reason why the event should never happen.”

*On the connection between climate change and the California wildfires

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports,

Climate change, including increased heat, extended drought, and a thirsty atmosphere, has been a key driver in increasing the risk and extent of wildfires in the western United States during the last two decades. Wildfires require the alignment of a number of factors, including temperature, humidity, and the lack of moisture in fuels, such as trees, shrubs, grasses, and forest debris. All these factors have strong direct or indirect ties to climate variability and climate change.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Jesus, Defender of the Oppressed

Heinrik Olrik, Sermon on the Mount

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Sunday

This past week Mariann Budde, who was my diocesan bishop when I lived and worked in southern Maryland, called upon to “have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now.” Among these were LGBTQ+ children, immigrant laborers, and refugees fleeing oppression. It was very much in the spirit of Jesus when, returning to Nazareth, he spoke before the synagogue in which he had grown up (today’s Gospel lesson). And just as Jesus was roundly attacked and almost thrown off a cliff, so was the bishop roundly attacked by Trump and his supporters, including so-called Christian Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House. Trump’s Christian supporters seem to have no problem beating up on the poor.

At the end of today’s post I include a poem by Nicaraguan poet Ernesto Cardenal, a practitioner of liberation theology who draws on the psalms just as Jesus did.

First, here’s what Jesus had to say in today’s Gospel:

The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
    because he has anointed me
    to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
    and recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
    to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.

And now Budde:

Let me make one final plea, Mr. President. Millions have put their trust in you and, as you told the nation yesterday, you have felt the providential hand of a loving God. In the name of our God, I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now. There are gay, lesbian and transgender children in Democratic, Republican, and Independent families, some who fear for their lives. The people who pick our crops and clean our office buildings; who labor in poultry farms and meat packing plants; who wash the dishes after we eat in restaurants and work the night shifts in hospitals. They…may not be citizens or have the proper documentation. But the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals. They pay taxes and are good neighbors. They are faithful members of our churches and mosques, synagogues, gurudwaras and temples. I ask you to have mercy, Mr. President, on those in our communities whose children fear that their parents will be taken away. And that you help those who are fleeing war zones and persecution in their own lands to find compassion and welcome here. Our God teaches us that we are to be merciful to the stranger, for we were all once strangers in this land. May God grant us the strength and courage to honor the dignity of every human being, to speak the truth to one another in love and walk humbly with each other and our God for the good of all people. Good of all people in this nation and the world. Amen”

And finally Cardenal’s poem, translated by Jonathan Cohen. If you know the psalms, you will see it as written very much in that tradition:

Give Ear to My Words, Psalm 5

Give ear to my words O Lord
        Hear my groans
Listen to my protest
For you are not a God who is a friend of dictators
nor a supporter of their politics
nor are you influenced by their propaganda
nor do you associate with any gangster

There’s no honesty in their speeches
nor in their press releases

They talk of peace in their speeches
while they increase their war production

They talk of peace at Peace Conferences
and secretly prepare for war
    Their lying radios blare all night long

Their desks are piled with criminal plans
      and sinister documents

But you will protect me from their plans

They speak through the mouth of machine guns
Their flashing tongues
      are bayonets…

Punish them O God
   foil their politics
mix up their memos
      block their programs

At the hour of the Alarm Siren
you will be with me
you will be my refuge on the day of the Bomb

You bless the righteous
who don’t believe in the lies of their ads
nor in their publicity and political campaigns

Your love surrounds them
       like armored tanks

It’s worth noting that, while Cardenal’s radical Christianity drew the fire of Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza so that he had to flee to Costa Rica, it also angered the Marxist government that overthrew Somoza. His funeral in 2020 was disrupted by pro-Daniel Ortega supporters and he had to be buried in secret.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Le Guin: Imagining Trump Alternatives

Ursula K. Le Guin

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Friday

A recent Literary Hub article on Ursula Le Guin’s activism grapples with how to respond to Trumpism’s recent victory, with Julie Phillips looking back over the author’s life and works for anything useful.

Phillips begins with Le Guin’s response to Trump’s first victory in 2016. “Americans have voted for a politics of fear, anger, and hatred,” Le Guin observed, and her fear was that liberals like her would fall into a vicious circle of action and reaction. It’s something that happens in The World for Word Is Forest, where the peaceful Athsheans live in accord with nature until aggressive earthlings invade them in a search for natural resources. Although they manage to repel the invaders, they are tainted by the experience, learning that it is possible to kill without reason.

As she processed Trump’s victory, Le Guin wrote that she was looking “for a place to stand, or a way to go, where the behavior of those I oppose will not control my behavior.” In her case, she turned to Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching, advocating his “paradoxical ideal” of “doing without doing”:

[S]he advised standing firm, “refusing to engage an aggressor on his own terms.” Instead of fighting back, she counseled patience, compassion, and courage. “Defending a cause without fighting, without attacking, without aggression,” she argued, “is an action. It is an expression of power. It takes control.”

For a concrete example, she turned to water, which

gives way to anything harder than itself, offers no resistance, flows around obstacles, accepts whatever comes to it,…yet continues to be itself and to go always in the direction it must go. The tides of the oceans obey the moon while the great currents of the open sea keep on their ways beneath. Water remains itself and pursues its course, flowing down and on, above ground or underground, breathing itself out into the air in evaporation, rising in mist, fog, cloud, returning to earth as rain, refilling the sea. Water doesn’t have only one way. It has infinite ways, it takes whatever way it can, it is utterly opportunistic, and all life on earth depends on this passive, yielding, uncertain, adaptable, changeable element.

Phillips acknowledges herself somewhat frustrated by this response—it’s too vague and mystical for her—so she turns to how Le Guin actually lived her beliefs, along with what her fiction reveals. In The Dispossessed, for instance, she describes an anarchist community that has turned its back on capitalism and found another way to live. To reread The Dispossessed during the closing days of the 2024 election, Philips says,

was to take a restful vacation from billionaire oligarchs and election stress. On Anarres there are no politicians, no bosses, no wages, no police, “no law but the single principle of mutual aid between individuals” and “no government but the single principle of free association.” Its goals aren’t in the future—what we can achieve someday, when we run the perfect campaign or elect the perfect candidates—but in the process itself. Its people practice a politics of means, not ends.

While the Anarresti have only one word for “work” and “play,” Phillips notes, they do have a special word for drudgery (kleggich), which involves “the necessary tasks that keep households and societies running.”  Le Guin, she points out, devoted much of her life to “small actions to support her city and its communities.” She also participated in various elections, stuffing envelopes and writing newsletters for Eugene McCarthy (in 1968) and, over the years, giving benefit reading “for bookstores, writers’ retreats, a women’s shelter, against hunger, censorship, AIDS.”

The idea of small actions making a difference is embraced in her well-known short story “The Ones Who Talk Away from Omelas,” a parable where certain citizens choose to walk away from their utopian society because this society can only exist if a child is mistreated. The parable applies to any society that exploits a few for the benefit of the many.

Phillips reports that Le Guin originally considered having people come in and save the child, even though in doing so they would render the rest of society unhappy. It’s noteworthy that, in her final version as in Dispossessed, she has people leave rather than strive to rectify the injustice.

While this may sound escapist, there’s something important that Le Guin is doing, which is using her fiction to imagine other possibilities for society. In my book Better Living through Literature I talk about how Marxist literary theorist Fredric Jameson praises Le Guin and certain other science fiction authors for this imagining:

Jameson [believes] that, if we have difficulty imagining a better world, it is “not owing to any individual failure of imagination but as the result of the systemic, cultural, and ideological closure of which we are all in one way or another prisoners.” In other words, those in power limit our very ability to imagine….

In his writing Jameson contends that utopian science fiction such as Dispossessed, Joanna Russ’s Female Man, Marge Piercy’s Women on the Edge of Time, and Samuel Delany’s Triton can counter this closure. He writes that their “deepest vocation is to bring home, in local and determinate ways, and with a fullness of concrete detail, our constitutional ability to imagine Utopia itself.”

In other words, by immersing ourselves in literary sci-fi, we begin chipping away at the impediments to imagining, thereby creating a space for radical aspiration. It’s a way of keeping our hope muscles from atrophying.

In her Literary Hub article, Phillips writes about a 1982 interview by a science fiction magazine where Le Guin was asked what she would do to save the world. She impatiently replied,

 The syntax implies a further clause beginning with if…What would I do to save the world if I were omnipotent? But I am not, so the question is trivial. What would I do to save the world if I were a middle-aged middle-class woman? Write novels and worry.

To which Phillips adds, “If ‘worry’ can be translated as ‘care,’ then she combined her vision for the future with tending to what is worthy of care in the here and now.”

In short, Le Guin maintains a healthy balance between tending to local projects “while still writing and listening to the voices of writers who ‘can see alternatives to how we live now, and can see through our fear-stricken society … to other ways of being.’”

A novelist may not be able to tell us exactly what to do in the fact of a Donald Trump–Le Guin in fact shies aways from being didactic in her novels–but he or she\ helps prevent us from succumbing to his version of the world. While the fascist mentality seeks to limit what we see as possible, works like Dispossessed and “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” expand our horizons.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Zadie Smith and Multicultural Tennis

Ben Shelton with his father and coach Bryan

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Thursday

I’m repurposing a post I wrote this past November on Zadie Smith’s novel Swing Time (2016) because it has become relevant in a new way. The novel, which I was teaching in a Postcolonial Literature class in Slovenia, has an episode featuring former African American tennis player Bryan Shelton. In recent news, Shelton’s son Ben has just been involved in a minor dust-up at the Australian Open after reaching the semi-finals.

Following his quarterfinal win over France’s Gael Monfils, Ben launched into the media, complaining, “I’ve been a little bit shocked this week with how players have been treated by the broadcasters.” After providing several examples, including a reporter who reportedly said, “Hey, Ben, how does it feel that no matter who you play in your next match, no one is going to be cheering for you?” Shelton concluded,

 I mean, may be true, but I just don’t think the comment is respectful from a guy I’ve never met before in my life. I feel like broadcasters should be helping us grow our sport and help these athletes who just won matches on the biggest stage enjoy one of their biggest moments. I feel like there’s just been a lot of negativity. I think that’s something that needs to change.”

Although Shelton’s father Bryan also gets no respect from the owner of a London pizza parlor in Zadie Smith’s novel, the staff are definitely cheering for him. In an episode featuring Shelton’s fourth-round run in the 1994 Wimbledon tournament, Smith shows how new alliances spring up in our globalized world. Those cheering include immigrants from Republic of Congo, Somalia, and Bosnia, along with narrator Fern, who is the daughter of an English father and an Afro-Jamaican mother.

That they are cheering is no surprise. Although we have become accustomed to players of color since the Williams sisters, Bryan Shelton was one of the very Black players in 1994 and was the first African American to win an ATP event since Arthur Ashe did so in 1978.

In the novel, the pizza parlor is run by Bahran, an Iranian who longs to belong to the privileged Anglo demographic. For instance, Bahran claims that polo is his favorite sport, causing his staff to explode with laughter. Fern observes in him

a flamboyant, comic rage that expressed itself in a constant obscene teasing of everyone around him—racial, sexual, political, religious teasing—and which almost every day resulted in a lost customer or employee or friend, and so came to seem to me not so much offensive as poignantly self-defeating.

Thinking at first that Fern is Persian because of her nose, Bahran is solicitous and complimentary. When he discovers her mother is from Jamaica, however, he turns on her, telling her that her people “don’t pay, or they fight, or they drug dealers. Don’t give me face! How you be offended? You know! Is truth.”

Because she needs the money, however, Fern tells the reader she “couldn’t afford to be offended.”

Tensions are turned up a notch when the restaurant television begins showing Bryan Shelton’s Wimbledon matches. Fern reports,

As it happened, I hadn’t been following Shelton had never heard of him really before [Somalian] Anwar pointed him out, but now I did follow him, along with Anwar I became his number-one fan. I brought little American flags to work on the days of his games…Together we cheered Shelton, danced around the place at each successful point, and as he won one match and then another, we began to feel like we, with our dancing and whooping, were the ones propelling him forward, and that without us he’d be done for. At times Bahram behaved as if he believed this, too, as if we were performing some ancient African voodoo rite. Yes, somehow we put a spell on Bahram just as much as Shelton, and as the days of the tournament passed and Shelton still refused to be knocked out I saw Bahram’s many other pressing worries…all slip away until his sole preoccupation was ensuring we did not cheer for Bryan Shelton, and that Shelton himself did not get to the Wimbledon final.

It all comes to a head when Shelton, in the third round, comes up Karim Alami, an Arab player from Morocco. The atmosphere in the pizza parlor becomes electric:

Their match was to start at two. Bahram arrived at one There was a great feeling of anxiety and anticipation in the place, delivery boys who were not meant to come till five came early, and the Congolese cleaner began working through the back of the kitchen at unprecedented speed in the hope she would reach front-of-house—and therefore the television—by the time the game began.

Throughout the match, Bahram chain-smokes Gauloises cigarettes and offers a running commentary that “had as much to do with eugenics as backhands and lobs and double faults.” This includes delineating the differences between Arabs and those from Sub-Saharan Africa:

The black man, he informed us, he is instinct, he is moving body, he is strong, and he is music, yes, of course, and he is rhythm, everybody know this, and he is speed, and this is beautiful, maybe, yes, but let me tell you tennis is game of the mind—the mind! The black man can be good strength, good muscle, he can hit ball hard, but Karim he is like me: he think one, two step in front. He have Arab mind. Arab mind is complicated machine, delicate. We invent mathematics. We invent astronomy. Subtle people. Two steps ahead. Your Bryan now he is lost.

“But,” Fern reports,

he was not lost: he took the set seven-five and Anwar took the broom away from the Congolese cleaner—whose name I did not know, whose name no one ever thought to ask—and made her dance with him, to some highlife he had going on the transiter radio he carried everywhere.

The euphoria does not last, however, as Shelton loses the next set 6-1, leading to a Bahran attack on Black Africans in general. “Wherever you go in world,” he tells Anwar, “you people at bottom! Sometimes at top White man, Jew, Arab, Chinese, Japan—depends. But your people aways lose.”

Meanwhile, with the score 2-1 sets in favor of Shelton, the game goes into a fourth set, at which point

we had stopped pretending to be a pizza place. The phone rang and no one answered, the oven was empty, and everybody was crammed into the small space at the front. I sat on the counter with Anwar, our nervous legs kicking the cheap MDF panels until they rattled. We watched these two players—in truth almost perfectly matched—battling towards an elongated, excruciating tiebreak that Shelton then lost, five-seven. Anwar burst into bitter tears.

And then, in a passage that my Slovenians and one Macedonian appreciated as it features a former countryman from the Yugoslav days,

“But Anwar, little friend: he have one more set,” explained the kindly Bosnian chef, and Anwar was as grateful as the man sitting in an electric chair who’s just spotted the governor through the Plexiglas, running down the hall.

When Shelton wins the fifth and deciding set, the reaction is electric:

Anwar turned his radio up full blast and every kind of dance burst forth from me, winding, stomping, shuffling—I even did the shim-sham. Bahram accused us all of having sex with our mothers and stormed out.

He then, however, figures out a way to salvage some self-respect. Recall that, up to this point, he has been unloading on Shelton and his employees for their African heritage. Now he plays the one card he has left. Showing Fern a photo of Shelton as she is taking phone orders, he says,

“Look close. Not black. Brown. Like you.”
“I’m working.”
“Probably he is half-half, like you. So: this explains.”
I looked not at Shelton but at Bahram, very closely. He smiled.
“Half-winner,” he said.
 I put the phone down, took my apron off and walked out.

Bryan Shelton, in other words, is Black until it serves a racist agenda to categorize him as White. Bahram would be sure to make this point even more emphatically in the case of Bryan’s mixed-race son Ben, whose skin is lighter than his father’s.

These passages get at the heart of Smith’s vision, which is that citizens from the former colonies are transforming the motherland, turning it into a vibrant but bewildering new entity in which traditional distinctions are overwhelmed and new lines are drawn.

Of course, this is also leading to the rise of rightwing nationalism in many nations, along with immigrants who—like the Iranian Bahran—dream of joining those in power. Throughout American history we have seen various groups seeking to join the upper echelons of our caste system and become “White,” including the Irish, the Scots, the southern Italians, the Greeks, the Poles, and so on. Such longing may have played a deciding role in the 2024 election as it appears that certain Latinos, in spite of Donald Trump depicting them as “rapists and murders,” were willing to vote for him. Trump also drew more support than expected from South and East Asians. How many Bahrams do we have, one wonders–-which is to say, how many are willing to denigrate the descendants of Black Africa in order to become acceptable to White America? What are they willing to sell out to achieve acceptance?

For their part, Barack Obama and Kamala Harris, despite being mixed race, did not choose to become Black, despite Trump’s claims. America’s caste system is such that they were inevitably “cast” into that identity. To their credit, they embraced it and became inspirational figures. But race continues to be a major force—maybe the major force—in American political life.

Which is why Postcolonial Literature classes such as the one I was teaching in Slovenia are so vital. The entire world is experiencing cultural explosions like those described by Smith, and writers everywhere are exploring them. Teaching this class, which was made up of straight-up Slovenians, hyphenated Slovenians (Serbian-Slovenian, Sudanian-Slovenian), and Erasmus students from Germany, Belgium, Macedonia, and Turkey, made this clearer than ever to me.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

On Odysseus & Trump’s Desecration

Odysseus and the suitors

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, write to me at [email protected]. Comments may also be sent to this address. I promise not to share your e-mail with anyone. To unsubscribe, write here as well.

Wednesday

My faculty reading group has just finished discussing the Odyssey, and the voice of Odysseus confronting the suitors is still ringing in my ears. His words could easily be directed towards Donald Trump.

The suitors violate one of the most sacred tenets of ancient Greek society. Like Paris in The Iliad, who abducts his host’s wife and triggers the Trojan War, they abuse the laws of hospitality. Meanwhile Trump and the rest of their crew are determined to violate the Constitution, the rule of law, and America’s expressed commitment (in The Declaration of Independence) to equity and fairness. Among the president’s most egregious actions on his first day was

–pardoning all those who invaded the Capitol and assaulted police on January 6;
–decreeing an end to birthright citizenship;
–halting refugee resettlement, including Afghans who supported us in the war there.

Trump is also withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organizing, thereby relinquishing American leadership in addressing the most pressing problems facing the world. Joe Biden made important steps in fighting climate change, which is pounding us all, and the United States played a key role in stopping or limiting Ebola and Covid. These threats won’t go away just because Trump decides to ignore them.

We can add to these measures Trump’s determination to turn that United States into Trump, Inc. From crypto to Trump-endorsed products to naked bribery, he’s willing to listen to anyone who directs cash his way. It’s difficult to imagine anything more sordid.

In Book XXII of Homer’s epic, Odysseus, who has returned to his house disguised as a beggar, is appalled at the desecration he witnesses. After first shaming the suitors by being the only man in the room who can bend his great bow, he throws off his beggar’s cloak and reveals himself with the following speech:

You yellow dogs, you thought I’d never make it
home from the land of Troy. You took my house to plunder,
twisted my maids to serve your beds. You dared
bid for my wife while I was still alive.
Contempt was all you had for the gods who rule wide heaven,
contempt for what men say of you hereafter.
Your last hour has come. You die in blood.

America was founded upon certain Enlightenment ideals, and while we haven’t always lived up to them (as any number of minority groups can testify), they have been at the foundation of our greatness as a nation. This administration feels nothing but contempt for these ideals and for what people will say of it hereafter.

We have other ways of settling conflict than bloodshed and there’s no one person that can stride in and restore us. But a reckoning is coming, in one form or another.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed