Notre Dame: Two Arms Raised in Prayer

 Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Sunday

Thanks to an extraordinary restoration effort, the Notre Dame cathedral in Paris opened its doors this week for the first time since the catastrophic fire five years ago. Back then I wrote a post on how Victor Hugo saved the cathedral in the 19th century with his novel Notre Dame de Paris, a.k.a. The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1831).

Théophile Gautier, the poet who popularized the cry “art of art’s sake” (“l’art pour l’art”), wrote a paean to the cathedral in the 19th century that captures much of its mystery. While it’s too long to share in its entirety—you can go here to read the whole thing—I have chosen a few of my favorite stanzas.

Gautier begins the poem by telling how, when feeling hemmed in by mundane life—by a world so small and stifling that he feels he can touch the horizon with his finger—he visits the cathedral at sunset. Note how he carries a copy of Hugo’s book when he does so:

Weary of this dead calm where faded in advance,
Like water that falls asleep, our years languish;
Tired of stifling my life in a narrow living room,
With young fools and frivolous women,
Exchanging banal words without profit;
Tired of always touching my horizon with my finger.

To make me whole again and widen my soul,
Your book in my pocket, at the towers of Notre-Dame;
I have often gone, Victor,
At eight o’clock, in summer, when the sun sets,
And its tawny disc, at the edge of the roofs it touches,
Floats like a big golden balloon.

Set against the darkening sky, Notre Dame seems to raise its twin towers to God before falling asleep:

As, for its good evening, in a richer hue,
The day that flees covers the holy cathedral,
Outlined in broad strokes on the fiery horizon;
And the twin towers, these stone canticles,
Seem like the two great arms that the city in prayer,
Before falling asleep, raises towards its God.

The cathedral’s famous flying buttresses Gautier accurately compares to a crab or a spider:

The blossoming nave, between its thin ribs,
Seems like a giant crab moving its claws,
An enormous spider, like networks,
Throwing to the front of the towers, to the black side of the walls,
In aerial threads, in delicate meshes,
Its tulles of granite, its lacework of arches.

Meanwhile, the stained stained-glass window, lit up by the setting sun, suddenly blooms like “a hundred magical flowerbeds”:

In the lead diamonds of the diaphanous stained glass window,
Fresher than the gardens of Alcine or Morgane,
Under a warm kiss of sun,
Strangely populated by heraldic monsters,
Suddenly a hundred magical flowerbeds bloom
With azure and vermilion flowers.

And then there are stone statues and stone carvings of gargoyles, dragons, basilisks, and other fantastical creatures, along with “myriads of saints”:

Mastiffs howling at the end of the gutters; tarasques,
Wurms and basilisks, dragons and fanciful dwarves,
Knights conquering giants,
Bundles of heavy pillars, sheaves of columns,
Myriads of saints rolled into collars,
Around the three gaping porches.

Lancets, pendants, warheads, slender clovers
Where the crazy arabesque hangs its lace
And its goldwork, crafted with great labor;
Gables with open holes, jagged spiers,
Needles of crows and angels surmounted,
The cathedral shines like an enamel jewel!

In the second part of the poem, Gautier recounts ascending the dark and narrow winding staircase to the top of one of the towers, something I have done five or six times in my life. Coming out of darkness into the blue, Gautier reports experiencing a “sublime vertigo.” He’s not the only poet to have had this reaction. In a poem comparing mounting the stairs to France groping through dark times, English poet Daniel Gabriel Rossetti writes,

As one who, groping in a narrow stair,
Hath a strong sound of bells upon his ears,
Which, being at a distance off, appears
Quite close to him because of the pent air:
So with this France. She stumbles file and square
Darkling and without space for breath…

Here’s Gautier: 

But what is this? when in the shadows you
Follow the slender staircase with countless spirals
And you finally see the blue again,
The void above and below the abyss,
A fear seizes you, a sublime vertigo
As you feel so close to God!

As under the bird that perches there, a branch
Under your feet that it flees, the tower quivers and leans,
The drunken sky totters and waltzes around you;
The abyss opens its mouth, and the spirit of vertigo,
Lashing you with its wing in sneering acrobatics
And makes the guardrails tremble at the front of the towers…

Gautier looks down at Paris from the high perch—the poem predates the Eiffel Tower and so is the highest building around—and says it is like seeing the core of a volcano:

Oh ! your heart beats, dominating from this peak,
Self, puny and small, a city thus made;
To be able, with a single glance, to embrace this great whole,
Standing up there, closer to the sky than to the earth,
Like the gliding eagle, seeing within the crater,
Far, far away, the smoke and the lava which is boiling!

Although the city is far away, still it’s a glorious sight. Remember, he’s seeing all of this at sunset:

How big it is! how beautiful ! the frail chimneys,
With their smoky turbans crowned at all times,
On the saffron sky trace their black profiles,
And the oblique light, with bold edges,
Throwing rich fires on all sides
In the mirror of the river enshrines a hundred mirrors.

As in a joyous ball, a young girl’s breast,
In the light of the torches lights up and sparkles
Under the jewels and finery;
In the light of the sunset, the water lights up, and the Seine
Cradles more jewels, certainly, than the queen ever
wears on her collar on great days.

The poet shifts in the third and final part, however. Beautiful though Paris is, it doesn’t compare with the cathedral. In fact, everything “sags and dies” when Gautier descends:

And yet, as beautiful as it is, O Notre-Dame,
Paris thus dressed in its robe of flame,
It is only so from the top of your towers.
When we go down, everything metamorphoses,
Everything sags and dies, nothing grandiose anymore,
Nothing left, except you, whom we always admire.

The poem concludes with Gautier lambasting Paris’s architectural taste. Like the British Pre-Raphaelites, he prefers medieval gothic (“Dantesque dress”) to Greek classical and other more recent architectural movements, finding it to be more spiritual. In his punchy final stanza, he goes so far as to say that Notre Dame surrounded by these “profane porticos,” “coquettish parthenons,” and “courtesan churches” is like “a chaste matron in the middle of whores!”

Who could prefer, in his pedantic taste,
To the serious and straight folds of your Dantesque dress,
These poor Greek orders which are dying of cold,
These bastard pantheons, copied in the school,
Antique thrift store borrowed from Vignole,
And, none of which outside can’t stand up straight.

O you! masons of the century, atheist architects,
Brains, thrown into a uniform mold,
People of the ruler and the compass;
Build boudoirs for stockbrokers,
And plaster huts for men of mire;
But houses for God, no!

Among the new palaces, the profane porticos,
The coquettish parthenons, courtesan churches,
With their Greek pediments on their Latin pillars,
The shameless houses of the pagan city;
It seems, to see you, Our Christian Lady,
A chaste matron in the middle of whores!

It was in this spirit that the cathedral was restored, often with materials that were the same as those destroyed and with original tools as well. Gautier could well have been pleased with the results.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wicked, a Parable for Our Time

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Friday

Julia and I attended Wicked early this week, and while I’m not a great fan of musicals, I was still entertained. The movie sent me back to the book, The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West, which I once taught in a fantasy class and which is even darker and more disturbing.

As many have noted, the film is particularly timely given how we’ve just elected as president a man whose central election strategy is scapegoating vulnerable populations. In Wicked, it’s the Wizard of Oz who scapegoats, with one of his victims a literal goat (Dr. Dillamond). In Oz as in Narnia, there are talking and non-talking animals—“animals” and “Animals”—but the Wizard figures the best way to consolidate power in his rebellious country is to single out all animals.

In a science class attended by future witches Elphaba and Glinda, Dr. Dillamond reports on the Wizard’s new measures:

[T]he Wizard of Oz had proclaimed Banns on Animal Mobility, effective several weeks ago. This meant not only that Animals were restricted in their access to travel conveyances, lodgings, and public services to travel conveyances, lodgings, and public services. The Mobility it referred to was also professional. Any Animal coming of age was prohibited from working in the professions or the public sector. They were, effectively, to be herded back to the farmlands and wilds if they wanted to work for wages at all.

Dr. Dillamond, who has been researching genetic differences between Animals and humans and discovering that they are small and inconsequential, pays a price for his truth-seeking: the Wizard’s henchmen cut his throat. (As I say, the book is darker than the movie.)

In a scene that also shows up in the film, we see his replacement prepared to dissect a lion cub to determine whether it is animal or Animal. “This is a very young cub,” Elphaba objects from her desk. “Where is its mother? Why is it taken from its mother at such an early age? How even can it feed?”

As she learns more stories about such discrimination and abuse, Elphaba becomes a passionate Animal rights advocate. At first she lobbies the Wizard to retract the Bann and then joins a terrorist organization that seeks to assassinate him.

Of course, as a person of color Elphaba is also the subject of discrimination and scapegoating. (In the opening scene, we see the community celebrating her death.) It’s one reason she identifies so passionately with the persecuted Animals. But in her fight, she goes into some dark places, engages in some actions that backfire, and ends up being labeled evil and marginalized. By the end, she is so hollowed out and suicidal that she can’t recognize goodness when it finally shows up.

I’m not entirely clear what Maguire’s point is, other than perhaps an illustration of W. H. Auden’s observation that “Those to whom evil is done do evil in return.” Oh, and that people are more sympathetic once they are given backstories. In any event, when Dorothy shows up, asking for forgiveness and fully prepared to hand over the silver slippers, Elphaba is utterly confounded. Here’s Dorothy:

Would you ever forgive me for that accident, for the death of your sister; would you ever ever forgive me, for I could never forgive myself!

And Elphaba’s response:

The Witch shrieked, in panic, in disbelief. That even now the world should twist so, offending her once again: Elphaba, who had endured Sarima’s refusal to forgive, now begged by a gibbering child for the same mercy always denied her? How could you give such a thing out of your own hollowness?

She was caught, twisting, trying, full of will, but toward what?

In her confusion, Elphaba accidentally catches her dress on fire, leading to Dorothy’s frantic attempt to save her with the fatal bucket of water.

It’s an unsatisfying ending and, despite Maguire’s wonderful imagination, an unsatisfying novel. I’m not sure that it provides special insight into the nature of evil other than that good people, under relentless pounding, can become wicked, or at least very confused.

There’s one Elphaba insight, however, that may help us better understand Trump’s hold on his followers. For years I’ve had the fantasy that they would one day awake to see what a bad man he is and throw him off. But what if they are drawn to him because he’s bad.

What if they find evil entertaining because it gives them an illicit thrill to which they’ve now become addicted. Maybe they get a charge out of his grabbing women by the pussy and by his calls for cops to rough up suspects, for rally attendees to punch out protesters, and for the military to shoot demonstrators in the legs. Maybe a sadistic streak is activated when they hear about border agents tearing immigrant children from their parents or Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s razor wire tearing people as they attempt to cross the Rio Grande. For many people, watching angry voters swarming over the Capitol was the best television ever.

And when progressives, liberals, and traditional Republicans complain, that makes it all the more delicious. Trumpists love watching their leader make these “elites” squirm.

I got this insight into Trump’s popularity when Elphaba, at the time a student at Shiz University, is discussing the nature of evil with her roommate Glinda. Struck by Glinda’s observation about how boring preachers sometimes enliven their sermons by turning to evil, Elphaba finds interesting connections between

evil and boredom. Evil and ennui. Evil and the lack of stimulation. Evil and sluggish blood.

I first came across the idea that boredom can become toxic from an article by an 18th century British Lit scholar about the 1747 novel Clarissa. Samuel Richardson’s runaway hit features an angelic heroine whom her family loves to torment. I was baffled by all the ways they choose to punish her when she resists marrying an old, rich, ugly suitor until Frederick Karl suggested they are motivated by boredom. Messing with sweet, dutiful Clarissa adds variety to their otherwise empty lives.

The Marquis de Sade picked up on their sadism when he made Clarissa the model for his novel Justine, where for several hundred pages we watch the innocent heroine get tortured in multiple ways. Literally tortured, that is, not just browbeaten and locked in her room.

While surely not all of Trump’s supporters are stimulated by his sadism, I suspect a fair number are, including some of his so-called Christian supporters. Why settle for the boring competency of the Biden-Harris administration when you can get this instead?

A Reader’s Comment (Lory):

Yes, Maguire’s book is unsatisfying, and it’s unclear what the point is in the end — although it starts out with an impressive imaginative verve, it didn’t follow through for me. It’s interesting that the story has been given another life through the wildly popular stage version, though I also found that unsatisfying. Clearly something in it strikes a chord in the wider culture, and you bring out some of the themes and issues well.

I’ve lately become fascinated by the idea of the dysregulated nervous system, which most of us have to some degree. In me, it led to migraines and psycho-emotional disturbances, in others, it could lead to the “evil as a remedy for boredom” pattern. What you call boredom could be due to a shutdown or muffling of our healthy emotional life, a defensive strategy formed by childhood experiences. Trump’s childhood and family were certainly dysfunctional enough for that, and I have to wonder about the history of his followers — including some of my own loved ones.

They want a leader who hates what they hate, who gives them permission to cast out and destroy. But the scapegoat is not their real enemy, they’re too frightened to confront that, because it is within. What can give one the courage to make that turnaround and face the inner demons? I know what helped me, but not everyone has my opportunities and advantages. I can only keep wondering and praying for help in our affliction.

My response: This is very interesting, Lory. I feel confirmed in my own feelings of dissatisfaction but am even more interested in what you say about boredom. I reminds me a little of the theories of Alice Miller, who looked at the prevalence of emotional child abuse experienced by followers of Hitler. Facing up to one’s inner demons always strikes me as a vital step toward restoring inner balance.

Last night I participated in a discussion group applying the ideas of French philosopher René Girard to Wiked, focusing above all on his theory of scapegoating. The speaker looked especially at “No One Mourns the Wicked,” “What Is This Feeling?” and “Popular.” Of course, the songs don’t show up in the book. If I think of the book as an exploration of what happens to the psyche of one who has been scapegoated–and who doesn’t entirely have the inner strength to resist–it makes more sense. To the end, Elphaba is obsessed with the silver slippers, which her father gave to her sister. This sibling jealousy destroys her in the end.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Note to Trump: Time for Real Work

Jean-François Millet, The Gleaners

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Thursday

Marge Piercy’s “To Be of Use” informs us what real governing and being in service to the people looks like. We got this from Joe Biden and Kamala Harris for the past four years. How much will we get from Donald Trump and J.D. Vance?

To Be of Use
Marge Piercy

The people I love best
jump into work head first
without dallying in the shadows
and swim off with sure strokes almost out of sight.
They seem to become natives of that element,
the black sleek heads of seals
bouncing like half-submerged balls.

I love people who harness themselves, an ox to a heavy cart,
who pull like water buffalo, with massive patience,
who strain in the mud and muck to move things forward,
who do what has to be done, again and again.

I want to be with people who submerge
in the task, who go into the fields to harvest
and work in a row and pass the bags along,
who are not parlor generals and field deserters
but move in a common rhythm
when the food must come in or the fire be put out.

The work of the world is common as mud.
Botched, it smears the hands, crumbles to dust.
But the thing worth doing well done
has a shape that satisfies, clean and evident.
Greek amphoras for wine or oil,
Hopi vases that held corn, are put in museums
but you know they were made to be used.
The pitcher cries for water to carry
and a person for work that is real.

The challenges of governing don’t lend themselves to reality television. Can we get real work out of the White House and Congress rather than incessant posturing and never-ending bullshit? We’re about to find out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Defeating Dragon Despair after Harris Loss

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Wednesday

In my 2008 book How Beowulf Can Save America: An Epic Hero’s Guide to Defeating the Politics of Rage, I used the poem’s monsters to understand the intense anger that was driving–and that continues to drive–American politics. Beowulf, I believe, provides powerful insights into grief, with both Grendel’s Mother and the Dragon serving as figures for destructive grieving.

We can grieve as much for the death of a cherished ideal as for a person. I believe that rightwingers grieving over an America they thought they were losing—a White, Christian America—fueled Tea Party rage against Barack Obama while leading to the ascendency of birther Donald Trump. Meanwhile, many on the left also thought they were losing their country when it reelected a rapist felon who had attempted a coup. The challenge is to keep such grieving from damaging both others and ourselves.

Grendel’s Mother and the Dragon represent two different kinds of destructive grieving. Grendel’s Mother is its active form. When the troll’s son is killed, she lashes out indiscriminately, assuaging her own hurt by hurting others.

By killing Hrothgar’s best friend Aeschere, she chooses her target well, causing the king to sink into despair. Hrothgar is in danger of becoming a dragon king, moaning, “Rest, what is rest, sorrow has returned.”

Although Hrothgar (with the help of Beowulf) snaps out of it, we encounter numerous kings in the poem who do not. Throughout the poem, there are instances of kings and warriors in the grip of dragon depression, withdrawing into mental caves and abandoning all worldly responsibilities.

One king mentioned in the poem, Hrethel, retreats to his bed and never gets up again after losing his eldest son. There is the “last veteran,” who retreats into a funeral barrow, which becomes a dragon’s lair. Beowulf himself (as I interpret the final battle) is in danger of becoming a dragon king: late in his life, after a long and successful reign, he looks back and sees nothing but one meaningless death after another. In a struggle with his internal dragon, the question becomes whether he will lose to the monster or emerge a king.

In 2008, many on the right became increasingly open to the idea of violence. America saw an explosion of gun sales, along with an unprecedented rise in hate crimes and politically motivated mass shootings. And of course there was January 6.

As I look at Democratic responses to Kamala Harris’s defeat, I see some who are drawn to a Grendel’s Mother response and want to transfer their own hurt to one of their own whom they consider responsible: Harris herself, Joe Biden, Democratic officials, wokism, neoliberalism, etc. As many have noted, such critics often have their pre-set narratives, blaming those who didn’t take their advice in the election.

Note, however, that there’s far less talk of actual violence—and less condoning of actual violence—from angry Democrats, in part because the party comes down harder on hate speech within its ranks than does the GOP. Democrats don’t flirt with the left equivalents of White supremacists, the Proud Boys, the KKK, and modern-day Nazis, nor do they post family Christmas photos of everyone wielding an AK-47. For the most part, Kamala Harris supporters are more likely to suffer from dragon depression than fantasies of troll violence.

In my book I note what it takes for Beowulf to kill the dragon. Notably he can’t do it alone but requires the help of his nephew to defeat the beast. Suffering alone is itself a dragon trait: we think that we can protect ourselves from hurt by pulling into our caves and developing thick, scaly defenses. In reality, these are just cover for raging inner fire and a poison that runs in our veins.

So while our impulse may be to retreat into our disappointment, a healthier response is to find a community and engage in positive action. When we do, as nephew Wiglaf discovers, a cave of wonders opens up.

[Wiglaf] saw beyond the seat
a treasure-trove of astonishing richness, 
wall-hangings that were a wonder to behold,
glittering gold spread across the ground, 
the old dawn-scorching serpent’s den
packed with goblets and vessels from the past…

And he saw too a standard, entirely of gold,
hanging high over the hoard,
a masterpiece of filigree; it glowed with light 
so he could make out the ground at his feet
and inspect the valuables.

Although Kamala Harris’s campaign came up short, it revealed that millions of Americans—close to half of those who voted–are hungry to celebrate freedom and joy. Reliving those moments and building on them is better than snarling bitterly in a dark and lonely place.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments closed

Eliot’s Hollow Men and Trump’s Enablers

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Tuesday

With Donald Trump’s nomination of sycophant Kash Patel to head the FBI—arguably his scariest pick given Patel threats against Trump’s perceived enemies–the incoming president continues with his plans to  “destroy the institutions of the democratic American state and replace those institutions with an authoritarian government whose officials are all loyal to Trump” (Heather Cox Richardson). Since Republicans hold the Senate, which is responsible for confirming presidential picks, we will soon get a good sense of whether the GOP caucus is indeed made up entirely of hollow men (and women).

I thought of T.S. Eliot’s “The Hollow Men” after reading a blog essay by authoritarianism expert Ruth ben-Ghiat. The New York University history professor points out that authoritarians like Trump hollow out institutions by “voiding them of any values and professionalism beyond loyalty to the leader.” In the process, they also hollow out their followers:

Strongmen need to bring everyone around them down to their level of corruption and depravity. To show their loyalty, elites compete to be the most sycophant and self-abasing, doing anything the leader asks, no matter how criminal, and going along with the inevitable escalations of violence and corruption. 

By pledging support to a brutal demagogue, ben-Ghiat continues, “you are sooner or later required to betray not only your compatriots, but also yourself.”

The key event in Trump’s rise, ben-Ghiat believes, is the January 6 attack on the Capitol, which our current day fascists regard as “the foundational moment of the New Era of Trumpism.” By refusing to acknowledge what all the world witnessed on that day, Trump supporters have twisted themselves into elaborate contortions. “If authoritarian history is any guideline,” ben-Ghiat writes, “Jan. 6 could become a holiday one day.”

With that in mind, let’s turn to Eliot’s poem. Its description of the hollow men could apply to those spineless Republicans who, while fully aware of Trump’s depravity, attempt to walk quietly so as not to draw his attention:

We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats’ feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar

Shape without form, shade without color,
Paralyzed force, gesture without motion…

Eliot proceeds to draw a contrast between these people and “lost violent souls” such as Guy Fawkes and Heart of Darkness character Kurtz (the two figures mentioned in the poem’s epigraphs). The Catholic insurgent Fawkes attempted to blow up Parliament in a 1605 plot while Kurtz goes rogue in the Congo, sloughing off the restraints of civilization as he engages in various unnamed acts of barbarism. As bad as these two men are, Eliot finds the hollow men even worse. At least Fawkes and Kurtz take bold action.

If we see Trump as one of the lost violent ones—he has certainly shown himself capable of violence, calling for protesters to be shot in the legs and siccing his supporters on the Capitol–then to judge him as less contemptible than spineless GOP legislators raises an interesting ethical question: Who is worse, the tyrant or those who enable the tyrant?

In rationalizing Trump’s actions, GOP legislators behave like Eliot’s scarecrow, donning multiple disguises and “behaving as the wind behaves”:

Let me also wear
Such deliberate disguises
Rat’s coat, crowskin, crossed staves
In a field
Behaving as the wind behaves

Eliot compares the hollow men to the souls in Dante’s limbo who, having lived lives of neither infamy nor praise, are condemned to spend eternity on the banks of death’s river without ever crossing over. Among them are the angels who, in the celestial battle between Satan and God, chose to sit it out. “This blind life of theirs is so debased,” Virgil tells Dante, “they envious are of every other fate.”

Eliot says that the hollow men cannot meet the eyes of “those who have crossed/ With direct eyes, to death’s other Kingdom.” I wonder if those who have enabled Trump can meet the eyes of those who courageously stood up to him, principled Republicans such as Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger. For their part, those with principles think of the sell-outs—if they think of them at all—as “the hollow men, the stuffed men.”

What eats away at the hollow men is the memory of a time when they believed in constitutional democracy. Now, they catch only glimpses of the great American experiment that was once at the foundation of their political identity:

Sunlight on a broken column
There, is a tree swinging
And voices are
In the wind’s singing
More distant and more solemn
Than a fading star.

These reminders of former beliefs are so painful that they want to avoid proximity with the righteous. “Let me be no nearer/In death’s dream kingdom,” Eliot imagines them saying, and then,

No nearer-

Not that final meeting
In the twilight kingdom.

Presumably these legislators once entered Congress with a vision of making the world a better place. Now, however, they feel as though they are in a sterile desert worshipping stone images (which is not a bad description of Trump worship):

This is the dead land
This is cactus land
Here the stone images
Are raised, here they receive
The supplication of a dead man’s hand
Under the twinkle of a fading star.

Is it like this in Paradise, the hollow men wonder—which in our framework is like asking, “Is this the high-minded life of service they once dreamed of?” There was a time when they trembled with tenderness at the thought. Now they kiss Trump’s ring:

Is it like this
In death’s other kingdom
Waking alone
At the hour when we are
Trembling with tenderness
Lips that would kiss
Form prayers to broken stone.

The new reality of Trump’s party is stark and grim:

In this valley of dying stars
In this hollow valley
This broken jaw of our lost kingdoms

In this last of meeting places
We grope together
And avoid speech
Gathered on this beach of the tumid river

There is one last hope for hollow men, Eliot then says: there is still a chance to ascend to the “multifoliate rose” of Dante’s Paradise. I think of those Republicans who, after years of kowtowing to Trump, finally tore themselves away. The eyes that “reappear” in Eliot’s next verse are those who have seen the light:

Sightless, unless
The eyes reappear
As the perpetual star
Multifoliate rose
Of death’s twilight kingdom
The hope only
Of empty men.

Unfortunately, Eliot’s hollow men appear unable to respond to that hope, engaging instead in sterile and juvenile activities:

Here we go round the prickly pear
Prickly pear prickly pear
Here we go round the prickly pear
At five o’clock in the morning.

What then follows in the poem is a series of steps that people could take were it not for “the shadow.” This shadow is not Donald Trump because that would remove agency and responsibility from the hollow men. The shadow is the inner block, the fear or the cynicism, that keeps them from living up to their potential. They are fully capable of doing what is right but choose not to.

The steps they could take, always aborted by the shadow, are

–having an idea and making it happen (“the idea and the reality”);
–having a desire and fulfilling that desire (“the motion and the act”);
–conceiving of an idea and bringing it forth into the world (“the conception and the creation”);
–having a feeling and acting upon it (“the emotion and the response”);
–having sexual desire and proceeding to orgasm (“the desire and the spasm”);
–having power and using that power to create something (“the potency and the existence”);
–having an ideal but abandoning it because they fear disappointment (“the essence and the descent”).

At this point in the poem, Eliot quotes a line from the Lord’s Prayer—”for thine is the kingdom”—which is a longing to bring God’s kingdom of love, peace, justice, and mercy to earth. But the hollow men are so, well, hollow that they can barely get the phrase out, much less the entire prayer. They can also barely speak the line, “For life is long,” an acknowledgement that there’s still plenty of time to get things right. By the end, they can barely articulate fragments:

For Thine is
Life is
For Thine is the

And the result for America? A transformation of our multicultural, constitutional democracy into a fascist regime. It happens, not in an apocalyptic blaze, but through one small surrender after another. Or as Eliot puts it,

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.

The good news is that the world hasn’t ended yet. For all of Eliot’s pessimism, principles that have lain dormant may yet be activated. The Senate chose not to make Trump toady Rick Scott their leader, and it deep-sixed the nomination of pedophile Matt Gaetz for Attorney General. Meanwhile, Trump resistance will still show up as the voices in the wind’s singing. The “perpetual star” of our democracy has not altogether faded.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Jo, Nell, Tiny Tim Needed Vaccines

Harry Furniss, Death of Little Nell

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Monday

Atlantic writer Tom Nichols, once a responsible Republican before Donald Trump drove him out of the party, has wondered whether the United States can be considered a serious nation. After all, why would we deliberately break institutions that are the envy of the world, including those tasked with curing disease.

Deliberate breakage seems to be Trump’s playbook in this area. Why else nominate for Health and Human Services Secretary the notorious anti-vaxxer Robert R. Kennedy, Jr., who is directly responsible for the measles deaths of 83 Samoan children? Why else nominate to head the National Institute of Health Dr. Jay Battacharya, whose proposal to allow Covid to spread in order to develop herd immunity would have resulted in another million deaths. (Instead we opted for masks and social distancing and were rewarded with the miraculous Covid vaccine.) Why else choose, as the top insurance regulator, Dr. Mehmet Oz, who has a history of hawking fraudulent medicines.

It appers that Trump aims to make infectious diseases great again.

In few areas has science proved its worth more than in battling illnesses that once claimed a horrific human toll. Following up on Tom Nichols’s observation, I have likened anti-vaxxers and their ilk to children born into wealthy families who take for granted their comfortable lives. Not having to be concerned about smallpox and polio and tuberculosis and cholera and typhus and typhoid and measles and whooping cough and chickenpox and a host of other diseases, they feel free to rail against the measures that have made their comfort possible.

Would they change their minds if they read the many 19th century novels that feature children dying of diseases that science has since found cures for? I like to think that the following heart-rending passages might make a difference.

Little Nell in Charles Dickens’ The Old Curiosity Shop – Tuberculosis

“I have no relative or friend but her—I never had—I never will have. She is all in all to me. It is too late to part us now.’

Waving them off with his hand, and calling softly to her as he went, he stole into the room. They who were left behind, drew close together, and after a few whispered words—not unbroken by emotion, or easily uttered—followed him. They moved so gently, that their footsteps made no noise; but there were sobs from among the group, and sounds of grief and mourning.

For she was dead. There, upon her little bed, she lay at rest. The solemn stillness was no marvel now.

Little Jo in Dickens’ Bleak House – Smallpox

“It’s turned wery dark, sir. Is there any light a-comin?”
“It is coming fast, Jo.”
Fast. The cart is shaken all to pieces, and the rugged road is very near its end.
“Jo, my poor fellow!”
“I hear you, sir, in the dark, but I’m a-gropin—a-gropin—let me catch hold of your hand.”
“Jo, can you say what I say?”
“I’ll say anythink as you say, sir, for I knows it’s good.”
“Our Father.”
“Our Father! Yes, that’s wery good, sir.”
“Which art in heaven.”
“Art in heaven—is the light a-comin, sir?”
“It is close at hand. Hallowed be thy name!”
“Hallowed be—thy—”
The light is come upon the dark benighted way. Dead!

Carol in Kate Wiggins’ The Birds’ Christmas Carol – Tuberculosis

There were tears in many eyes, but not in Carol’s. The loving heart had quietly ceased to beat and the “wee birdie” in the great house had flown to its “home nest.” Carol had fallen asleep! But as to the song, I think perhaps, I cannot say, she heard it after all!

Tiny Tim in Dickens’ Christmas Carol – Possibly rickets, polio, cerebral palsy, or tuberculosis

The Ghost [of Christmas Future] conducted him through several streets familiar to his feet; and as they went along, Scrooge looked here and there to find himself, but nowhere was he to be seen. They entered poor Bob Cratchit’s house; the dwelling he had visited before; and found the mother and the children seated round the fire.
Quiet. Very quiet. The noisy little Cratchits were as still as statues in one corner, and sat looking up at Peter, who had a book before him. The mother and her daughters were engaged in sewing. But surely they were very quiet!
“ ‘And He took a child, and set him in the midst of them.’ ”

Helen Burns in Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre – Tuberculosis, although the school itself is experiencing a typhus epidemic

“How comfortable I am! That last fit of coughing has tired me a little; I feel as if I could sleep: but don’t leave me, Jane; I like to have you near me.”
“I’ll stay with you, dear Helen: no one shall take me away.”
“Are you warm, darling?”
“Yes.”
“Good-night, Jane.”
“Good-night, Helen.”
She kissed me, and I her, and we both soon slumbered.
When I awoke it was day: an unusual movement roused me; I looked up; I was in somebody’s arms; the nurse held me; she was carrying me through the passage back to the dormitory. I was not reprimanded for leaving my bed; people had something else to think about; no explanation was afforded then to my many questions; but a day or two afterwards I learned that Miss Temple, on returning to her own room at dawn, had found me laid in the little crib; my face against Helen Burns’s shoulder, my arms round her neck. I was asleep, and Helen was—dead.

The parents in Francis Hodgson Burnett’s The Secret Garden, leaving Mary an orphan – Cholera

The Mem Sahib wrung her hands.
“Oh, I know I ought!” she cried. “I only stayed to go to that silly dinner party. What a fool I was!”
At that very moment such a loud sound of wailing broke out from the servants’ quarters that she clutched the young man’s arm, and Mary stood shivering from head to foot. The wailing grew wilder and wilder. “What is it? What is it?” Mrs. Lennox gasped.
“Someone has died,” answered the boy officer. “You did not say it had broken out among your servants.”
“I did not know!” the Mem Sahib cried. “Come with me! Come with me!” and she turned and ran into the house.
After that appalling things happened, and the mysteriousness of the morning was explained to Mary. The cholera had broken out in its most fatal form and people were dying like flies. The Ayah had been taken ill in the night, and it was because she had just died that the servants had wailed in the huts. Before the next day three other servants were dead and others had run away in terror. There was panic on every side, and dying people in all the bungalows.

These 19th century authors, faced with child death, railed against those who could have made a difference. Here’s Bronte:

When the typhus fever had fulfilled its mission of devastation at Lowood, it gradually disappeared from thence; but not till its virulence and the number of its victims had drawn public attention on the school. Inquiry was made into the origin of the scourge, and by degrees various facts came out which excited public indignation in a high degree. The unhealthy nature of the site; the quantity and quality of the children’s food; the brackish, fetid water used in its preparation; the pupils’ wretched clothing and accommodations—all these things were discovered, and the discovery produced a result mortifying to Mr. Brocklehurst, but beneficial to the institution.

And Dickens in Bleak House after Jo has died of smallpox:

Dead, your Majesty. Dead, my lords and gentlemen. Dead, right reverends and wrong reverends of every order. Dead, men and women, born with heavenly compassion in your hearts. And dying thus around us every day.

Do we want to return to those days? Or would we like this instead?

Scrooge was better than his word. He did it all, and infinitely more; and to Tiny Tim, who did not die, he was a second father.

Which America is going to win out, Bad Scrooge or Good Scrooge? Tiny Tim’s life hangs in the balance.

Added nbote: Apparently there are further problematic health nominees that I missed when I wrote this essay. Thanks to David Corn of Mother Jones, I’ve learned to the following succinct tweet from Dr. Jonathan Reiner, professor of medicine, surgery interventional cardiologist, and CNN medical analyst. Corn added the names in brackets:

If a new pandemic comes to the US next year we’ll have an NIH director [Jay Bhattacharya] who advocated for letting COVID burn through the US, an HHS Sec [Robert F. Kennedy Jr.] who believes in raw milk but not vaccines, an FDA commissioner [Marty Makary] who said COVID would be over by 4/2021, and a CDC director [Dave Weldon] who supported the debunked theory that vaccines cause autism.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

When the Light Knocks on the Door

William Holman Hunt, The Light of the World

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

First Sunday in Advent

Gwendolyn Brooks’s “truth” is a wonderful poem with which to kick off the dark but hopeful season of Advent. It reminds me a little of T.S. Eliot’s observation (in The Waste Land) that April is the cruelest month. Easier to remain in a vegetative state, Eliot observes—“Winter kept us warm, covering/ Earth in forgetful snow, feeding/ A little life with dried tubers”—than engage in the difficult process of growth, with its complications of memory and desire.

For her part, Brooks talks about dreading rather than greeting the sun, even though we have been weeping and praying for the sun “all though the night-years.” Having spent “so lengthy a season with shade,” she writes, we are startled when

we wake one shimmering morning to
Hear the fierce hammering
Of his firm knuckles
Hard on the door.

Often, when we talk about the Advent hope and the Christmas promise, we fail to mention the courage that it takes to hope. Brooks writes it is so much sweeter to “sleep in the coolness of snug unawareness” that, as a result, we may shudder and flee when the sun makes its presence felt.

truth
By Gwendolyn Brooks

And if sun comes
How shall we greet him?
Shall we not dread him,
Shall we not fear him
After so lengthy a
Session with shade?

Though we have wept for him,
Though we have prayed
All through the night-years—
What if we wake one shimmering morning to
Hear the fierce hammering
Of his firm knuckles
Hard on the door?

Shall we not shudder?—
Shall we not flee
Into the shelter, the dear thick shelter
Of the familiar
Propitious haze?

Sweet is it, sweet is it
To sleep in the coolness
Of snug unawareness.

The dark hangs heavily
Over the eyes.

If this were a John Donne poem, I would suspect the author of punning on “sun.” And indeed, though Brooks described herself as “non-religious,” there seems to be religious imagery throughout, especially in the image of the sun hammering on the door. In St. Paul’s Cathedral in London there is a William Holman Hunt painting of Jesus knocking at a door with no handle, meaning that it can only be opened from within. Or in a related albeit reversed use of door imagery, Jesus assures us in Matthew 7:7, “Knock and door will be opened to you.”

Opening a door and knocking on a door are simple actions. When life-changing light is involved, however, they require strength of mind.

Further thought: I’ve thought of a related poem by Lucille Clifton, who was a friend of Brooks. In “the light that came to lucille clifton” the poet writes,

but the light insists on itself in the world;
a voice from the nondead past started talking,
she closed her ears and it spelled out in her hand
“you might as well answer the door, my child,
the truth is furiously knocking.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

My Childhood Love for Krauss/Sendak

Illus. from Krauss and Sendak’s A Very Special House

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Friday

Back in September the New Yorker ran an article on a children’s book author that had a big impact on my life. Ruth Krauss, with a significant assist from illustrator Maurice Sendak, understood my child’s sense of humor as no author had before. Thanks to Adrieene Raphel’s piece, I now understand why.

The two books I remember the most are A Hole Is to Dig and A Very Special House. Raphel  notes that Krauss “pioneered a method that now seems intuitive: portraying the world from the perspective of a child’s imagination.” She observes,

The psychologist Arnold Gesell observed that children are, essentially, pragmatists, and Krauss’s great achievement was to take this logic to its extreme, conjuring a concrete vision of the world using the child’s imagination: “Toes are to dance on; eyebrows are to go over your eyes.” She collected the phrases from kindergartners in Rowayton, Connecticut, where she lived, and from four- and five-year-olds at the Bank Street School, in New York City…. Krauss was evoking consciousness itself, as found in the way a specific group of people deployed language.

I remember thinking hilarious the line “a tablespoon is to eat a table with,” with the joke punctuated by a Sendak cartoon of a boy with a broad smirk. I always felt that he and I were sharing the joke together.

The sense that I had found a kindred soul in Krauss/Sendak continued with A Very Special House, which I enjoyed even more. In this house, everything is topsy turvy: chairs are for climbing on, doors are for swinging on, walls are for drawing on, the bed is for bouncing on, the shelf is for sleeping on, and…but you get the point:

There’s a bed that’s very special
and a shelf that’s very special
and the chairs are very special
–but it’s not to take a seat–
and the doors are very special
and the walls are very special and
a table very special where to put your feet feet feet.

To this house the narrator brings home

a turtle
and a rabbit and a giant
and a little dead mouse
—I take it everywhere—
and some monkeys and some skunkeys
and a very old lion which…
is eating all the stuffing from the chairs, chairs, chairs.

This entourage unleashes chaos in the very special house:

They and I are making secrets
and we’re falling over laughing
and we’re running in and out
–and we hooie hooie hooie—
then we think we are some chickens
then we’re singing in the opera then
we’re going going going ooie ooie ooie.

Turn the page and there are no longer line breaks after the actions, capturing the undifferentiated confusion:

Oh ooie ooie ooie ooie
ooie ooie ooie—we’re
sprinkling cracker crumbs under all the cushions and that lion’s keeping snoring—going snore snore snore—and the monkeys are all dancing with a special monkey-feeling—like they’re leaving little feetprints on the ceiling ceiling ceiling—and I’m hopping and I’m skipping and I’m jumping and I’m bumping—and Everywhere is music—and the giant spilled his drinking and it went all down the floor and the rabbit ate a piece out of my very best door and Everybody’s yelling for more More MORE.

And where is this very special house? The narrator tells us as the book nears its end:

I know a house—
it’s not a squirrel house
it’s not a donkey house
–just like I said–
and it’s not up on a mountain
and it’s not down in a valley
and it’s not down in a hole
and it’s not down in our alley
and it’s not up in a tree
or underneath the bed–
oh it’s right in the middle—
oh it’s ret in the meedle—
oh it’s root in the moodle of my head head head.

Krauss and Sendak, in other words, validated my five-year-old imagination, which could go wild places that the dull adult world wouldn’t understand. The first-person-narration, which must have been new to me, helped form this special bond.

A third Krauss work that I grew up with her The Carrot Seed, which was illustrated by her husband Crockett Johnson. A small boy defies the naysayers in his family, who all tell him that his carrot seed will fail, by producing a carrot. And not just any carrot but one so large that it must be carted in a wheelbarrow. In other words, he refuses “to conform to the logic of others.” Raphel asks,

Is his care an act of defiance? Optimism? His perspective carries an almost existential force: if you plant a carrot seed, he believes, a carrot must come up. And so it does.

Johnson, meanwhile, wrote his own defiant children’s literature, such as Harold and the Purple Crayon, which “championed the power of children’s imagination over the lure of bourgeois rationalism. He was also the author of the fabulous cartoon strip Barnaby, in which Barnaby has an unusual fairy godfather–the cigar-smoking, chubby leprechaun Mr. O’Malley–whom only Barnaby can see. The strip was a major influence on Calvin and Hobbes.

The greatest children’s literature often privileges a child’s perspective over that of adults, with Lewis Carroll’s Alice books being the best example of this. As a child, I felt not only delighted by these narratives but empowered.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

All Which We Behold Is Full of Blessings

The Wye River

Note: If you wish to receive, via e-mail, (1) my weekly newsletter or (2) daily copies of these posts, notify me at [email protected] and indicate which you would like. I promise not to share your e-mail address with anyone. To unsubscribe, send me a follow-up email.

Thursday – Thanksgiving

When it comes to poetic treatments of gratitude, few supersede William Wordsworth’s “Tintern Abbey.” Indeed, I’m surprised I haven’t used it for a Thanksgiving blog post in the past. In any event, for those of us feeling down about the current state of the world, the poem calls us to a “cheerful faith that all which we behold is full of blessings.”

In the poem, Wordsworth has returned to a picturesque spot on the Wye River that he visited five years previously. This visit is far different, however, since earlier he came to find a refuge in nature. After all, at 23 he’d just had a tempestuous experience in France, what with the beginning of the Reign of Terror and his liaison with Annette Vallon, with whom he had a child. As he describes his previous visit to the Wye, he was

                             more like a man
Flying from something that he dreads, than one
Who sought the thing he loved.

In his earlier visit, he was also not particularly reflective. He describes the kind of person he was and his particular relationship with nature as follows:

                                For nature then
(The coarser pleasures of my boyish days
And their glad animal movements all gone by)
To me was all in all.—I cannot paint
What then I was. The sounding cataract
Haunted me like a passion: the tall rock,
The mountain, and the deep and gloomy wood,
Their colors and their forms, were then to me
An appetite…

It is a far more reflective Wordsworth that visits the spot five years later. Although he still revels in nature, he now realizes that nature’s “beauteous forms” will feed his soul in the future.  His expression of gratitude is why “Tintern Abbey” works for me as a Thanksgiving poem.

Memories of the Wye River’s “steep and lofty cliffs,” he reports, nourish him when he feeling lonely and depressed:

But oft, in lonely rooms, and ‘mid the din
Of towns and cities, I have owed to them,
In hours of weariness, sensations sweet,
Felt in the blood, and felt along the heart;
And passing even into my purer mind
With tranquil restoration…

The poet speculates that these “sensations sweet” have helped shape the best part of him, leading to “little, nameless, unremembered, acts of kindness and of love.”

But that’s not all the memories do. Wordsworth writes that, when his mind wanders back over the Wye visit and other such encounters with nature, he sometimes experiences a mystical feeling of oneness with the cosmos:

Nor less, I trust,
To them I may have owed another gift,
Of aspect more sublime; that blessed mood,
In which the burthen of the mystery,
In which the heavy and the weary weight
Of all this unintelligible world,
Is lightened:—that serene and blessed mood,
In which the affections gently lead us on,—
Until, the breath of this corporeal frame
And even the motion of our human blood
Almost suspended, we are laid asleep
In body, and become a living soul:
While with an eye made quiet by the power
Of harmony, and the deep power of joy,
We see into the life of things.

Realizing that he may be leaving the reader a little behind here—not all of us have mystical moments upon recalling a nature walk—Wordsworth pulls back a little. Even if his own out of body experiences be but “vain belief,” he says, these memories will still help us through depression and hard times:

                                                       If this
Be but a vain belief, yet, oh! how oft—
In darkness and amid the many shapes
Of joyless daylight; when the fretful stir
Unprofitable, and the fever of the world,
Have hung upon the beatings of my heart—
How oft, in spirit, have I turned to thee,
O sylvan Wye! thou wanderer thro’ the woods,
         How often has my spirit turned to thee!

Wordsworth is not done yet, however. In the poem’s final section, Wordsworth lets us know that he’s not alone. His younger sister is with him—he gets added delight from looking at the scene through her eyes—and he imagines that the scene will also nourish her in the future. No longer thinking only of himself, he is even more grateful that these memories will bolster someone he deeply loves. Again he references the world’s harshness as he describes the healing process:

                      Oh! yet a little while
May I behold in thee what I was once,
My dear, dear Sister! and this prayer I make,
Knowing that Nature never did betray
The heart that loved her; ’tis her privilege,
Through all the years of this our life, to lead
From joy to joy: for she can so inform
The mind that is within us, so impress
With quietness and beauty, and so feed
With lofty thoughts, that neither evil tongues,
Rash judgments, nor the sneers of selfish men,
Nor greetings where no kindness is, nor all
The dreary intercourse of daily life,
Shall e’er prevail against us, or disturb
Our cheerful faith, that all which we behold
Is full of blessings.

Today is not the day to spell out our own versions of evil tongues, rash judgments, sneers, unkindness, and dreary encounters. Nor is it a day to dwell on “solitude, or fear, or pain, or grief,” which the poet also foresees as possibilities within his sister’s future. Rather we, like William and Dorothy, can be grateful for how, through our encounters with natural beauty, our memories can become “a dwelling-place for all sweet sounds and harmonies.” Wordsworth reminds us that our most precious memories—the ones we are most grateful for—are those that include someone we love.

Which is the perfect message for this holiday that celebrates family.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed