Tag Archives: Hans Robert Jauss

Great Literature Shifts Expectations

In which I sum up Reader Reader Response theory as formulated by Hans Robert Jauss, who believes that great lit expands horizon of expectations.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , | Comments closed

Why I Think the Way I Think

I survey my intellectual history, especially the evolution of my thinking about literature’s impact on human behavior.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Lit and Life: My Intellectual Trajectory

I’ve long held that great literature impacts history harder than lesser literature. I trace the evolution of my ideas in today’s post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Who Determines What a Work Means?

I share a copy of a talk I gave on how literary interpretations are decided, focusing on theorists Stanley Fish and Hans Robert Jauss.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , | Comments closed

Great Lit Changes Expectations Horizons

Hans Robert Jauss’s believes that great literature changes horizons of expectation whereas lesser lit simply confirms them. If “Madame Bovary” was brought to trial, Jauss says, it is because it charted a new course in literary history that people didn’t understand.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , , | Comments closed

Invisible Man & Lolita Changed the ’50s

Ellison’s “Invisible Man” and Nabokov’s “Lolita” both challenged basic 1950s assumptions. The former changed public perceptions on what it meant to be black while the latter violated a tacit agreement not to go digging under neatly manicured lawns bordered by white picket fences.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

A Lit Theory that Affirms Readers

The students in my “Theories of the Reader ” course found the theorists we read affirming.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

The Reader’s Role in Literature

Reader Response Theory focuses on the reader’s involvement in literature, opening up avenues untouched by formalist criticism.

Posted in Uncategorized | Also tagged , , , , | Comments closed