Remembering My Son 20 Years Later

Justin carries the cross at the National Cathedral

Thursday

Today is the 20th anniversary of my eldest son’s death. While swimming in a normally safe spot in the St. Mary’s River, he was grabbed and pulled under by a rogue current, generated by an abnormally wet spring. He was a 21-year-old Religious Studies major at the time, and his death turned our world upside down.

I’ve written about how I turned to poetry to process his death. I particularly looked to elegies and for a while became obsessed with Tennyson’s In Memoriam. In the end, however, I chose for Justin’s gravestone a stanza from Shelley’s Adonais, written in memory of Keats. I imagined people sitting on the bench we installed, looking down at the spot where Justin drowned, and reading the following passage from stanza XLII:

He is made one with Nature: there is heard
His voice in all her music, from the moan
Of thunder, to the song of night's sweet bird;
He is a presence to be felt and known
In darkness and in light, from herb and stone…

I wanted people to imagine him present as they looked up at the trees and out over the water, and so it has transpired. For a long while people left sprigs of heather and small stones on the grave, but later these gave way to scallop shells from the beach. Children love the grave because they respond to the shells.

For today’s post, however, I choose a passage appearing earlier in the poem. Trying to make sense of Keats’s passing, Shelley notes the contrast between human death and nature’s eternal return. Every year at this time I too find my grief out of tune with the new growth and the vibrant animal life:

Ah, woe is me! Winter is come and gone,
But grief returns with the revolving year;
The airs and streams renew their joyous tone;
The ants, the bees, the swallows reappear;
Fresh leaves and flowers deck the dead Seasons' bier;
The amorous birds now pair in every brake,
And build their mossy homes in field and brere;
And the green lizard, and the golden snake,
Like unimprison'd flames, out of their trance awake.

Through wood and stream and field and hill and Ocean
A quickening life from the Earth's heart has burst
As it has ever done, with change and motion,
From the great morning of the world when first
God dawn'd on Chaos; in its stream immers'd,
The lamps of Heaven flash with a softer light;
All baser things pant with life's sacred thirst;
Diffuse themselves; and spend in love's delight,
The beauty and the joy of their renewed might.

Although the body decays, Shelley says in the next stanza that it is touched by Nature’s “spirit tender” and “exhales itself in flowers of gentle breath.” I love the shift from the celestial to the earthly, from stars to plant life. Elsewhere in the poem, Shelley associates poetry with the celestial, so astral splendor changing to flower fragrance hints at spirituality entering the world. “Nought we know dies,” Shelley concludes at this point in his exploration:

The leprous corpse, touch'd by this spirit tender,
Exhales itself in flowers of gentle breath;
Like incarnations of the stars, when splendor
Is chang'd to fragrance, they illumine death
And mock the merry worm that wakes beneath;
Nought we know, dies…

The poem has multiple shifts of tone, however, and doubts then arise. Humans, after all, are alone amongst nature’s creatures that know death, and death is “a most cold repose”:

Shall that alone which knows
Be as a sword consum'd before the sheath
By sightless lightning?—the intense atom glows
A moment, then is quench'd in a most cold repose.

Shelley may be drawing on the “Now let us praise famous men” passage from Ecclesiasticus in the next stanza, the one that reads,

And some there be, which have no memorial, who are perished as though they had never been, and are become as though they had never been born, and their children after them. (44:9)

Shelley is struck by how transient Keats’s qualities are. Often it is only our love for the dead that preserves them from oblivion, and the poet points out that our grief itself is transient. This line of thought leads him to the big questions: ”Whence are we, and why are we? Of what scene/The actors or spectators?” If existence is no more than an unending parade of mass death, then what’s the point?

Alas! that all we lov'd of him should be,
But for our grief, as if it had not been,
And grief itself be mortal! Woe is me!
Whence are we, and why are we? of what scene
The actors or spectators? Great and mean
Meet mass'd in death, who lends what life must borrow.
As long as skies are blue, and fields are green,
Evening must usher night, night urge the morrow,
Month follow month with woe, and year wake year to sorrow.

There are deliberate echoes here of Macbeth’s famous musings on the subject:

Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.

Shelley does not yield to such despair, however, and by the time he gets to the stanza I put on Justin’s stone, he is focusing on poetry. Keats is one with nature, not only in a biological sense but because “Ode to a Nightingale” has influenced how we hear “the song of night’s sweet bird.” That’s how “he is a portion of the loveliness/ Which once he made more lovely.”

Justin will not be remembered as Keats is, of course. Nevertheless, Shelley’s poem frames the experience of those who sit in the Trinity Church graveyard and think of those buried there. The dead become mingled with the beauty of the place. It’s possible to believe at such moments that

[t]he One remains, the many change and pass;
Heaven's light forever shines, Earth's shadows fly;
Life, like a dome of many-colour'd glass,
Stains the white radiance of Eternity,
Until Death tramples it to fragments.

I’ll cite one more passage as it reminds me of Justin, who was always smiling, always singing, and always engaged in spiritual search. Shelley writes of how “lofty thought lifts a young heart above its mortal lair” and declares,

The splendors of the firmament of time
May be eclips'd, but are extinguish'd not;
Like stars to their appointed height they climb,
And death is a low mist which cannot blot
The brightness it may veil.

Shelley is talking about great talents that died young, and while we’ll never know how high Justin would have soared—Shelley says of Keats that “he has outsoar’d the shadow of our night”–he too was a brightness that death cannot entirely blot. Or to cite Shelley’s concluding line, for me he is a star that “beacons from the abode where the Eternal are.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Dante Weighs In on Trumpian Sins

Having betrayed a higher trust, the Simoniacs find themselves inverted

Wednesday

Yesterday I discussed Donald Trump in relation to Dante’s seven circles of hell. I noted I was less interested in condemning him to Inferno than in his potential for reform. If I seem too focused on the president, feel free to expand the discussion to anyone who is worrying you at the moment.

You can even use Trump the way Dante uses his sinners: as a symbol of the sin. While Dante may at times appear to be settling personal scores, for the most part he is providing graphic descriptions so that we will grasp the ugliness of the sin and what it does to us. It can’t be quietly normalized.

For Dante, anything that keeps us from God is abhorrent. If you don’t want to use the word “God,” think of the process as rising to your best self. Anything that causes us to miss this mark (to use the archery origins of the word “sin”) must be identified and transcended if we are to make the most of our existence.

But returning to our conman-in-chief, we can expect that the last two circles of hell might be his ultimate destination given that they are reserved for the maliciously fraudulent. Dante considers fraud a worse crime than violence because it involves betrayal. Here are the sinners who appear to match Trump best:

–Simoniacs (Circle 8, Bolgia 3) –  Simoniacs, who include a number of popes, are those who have sold ecclesiastic favors and offices. If our equivalent is politicians who have betrayed the public trust and put the government up for sale, Trump certainly qualifies. Since these offenders claim to have been reaching up to God when in actuality they reached down to money, Dante buries them upside down in tubes. Instead of Pentecostal fire loosening their hearts and tongues, fire burns the bottom of their feet.

–The Grafters (Circle 8, Bolgia 5) – I’ve blogged previously about Dante’s grafters, who get hooked by demons just as they themselves hooked others. Despite Congress’s attempts to block Trump properties from getting any of the trillions that have been allotted to save the economy, the president’s grappling hooks appear to be at work.

–Hypocrites (Circle 8, Bolgia 6)—I include Hypocrites here only to absolve Trump of this sin. Francois de La Rochefoucauld famously wrote that hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue, but Trump doesn’t feel the need to pay homage to virtue. The hypocrites in Inferno are weighed down by leaden garments under their attractive exteriors, but Trump seems as light as the air when he tells his lies. This means that he probably belongs much more with the Evil Counselors in Bolgia 8.

–Evil Counselors (Circle 8, Bolgia 8)—A couple of months ago I reported on a student troubled by how Athena applauds Odysseus for his incessant lying. Virgil and Dante are far less forgiving, grouping Odysseus/Ulysses with the evil counselors—which is to say, with those who lie incessantly to get their way. Ulysses is wrapped in a tongue of flame, which John Ciardi explains as follows:

Their sin was to abuse the gifts fof the Almighty, to steal His virtue for low purposes. And as they stole from God in their lives and worked by hidden ways, so are they stolen from sight and hidden in the great flames which are their own guilty consciences. And as…they sinned by glibness of tongue, so are the flames made into a fiery travesty of tongues.

Ulysses’s most destructive lie was the Trojan horse, which led to the slaughter of thousands. In the tale that he tells Dante about how he and his shipmates died, his glib tongue persuades them to sail with him on a doomed voyage. Our own glib-tongued leader may be taking down his own fervent followers, whether they be bankrupt soybean farmers, struggling small business owners, or Covid protesters.

Sowers of Discord (Circle 8, Bolgia 9)—The sowers of discord have been split down the middle so that they walk around dragging their spilled organs behind them. Many have noted that Trump is the first to have regarded himself as president only of his own faction, not of the entire nation. His political strategy involves inflaming his base, not winning over others. Dante is appalled at the many mangled bodies he witnesses in this pit, all responsible for having encouraged bloody civil wars and other such conflicts:

At grief so deep the tongue must wag in vain;
the language of our sense and memory
lacks the vocabulary of such pain.

He describes one figure as follows:

A wine tun when a stave or cant-bar starts
does not split open as wide as one I saw
split from his chin to the mouth with which man farts.

Between his legs all of his red guts hung
with the heart, the lungs, the liver, the gall bladder,
and the shriveled sac that passes shit to the bung.

— Traitors to Country (Circle 9, Round 2)—The last circle, which contains traitors—the worst of the fraudulent—is frozen over. Whereas violence arises out of hot anger, betrayal occurs as cold calculation. Trump’s selling out American interests for Russian electoral help (or perhaps for financial gain or because of blackmail) qualify him for this final circle.

The figure Dante encounters here is Antenora, who unsealed the gates of Troy so that the Greeks could enter. Of all the figures that Dante encounters, this is the one that enrages him the most. First he kicks his head, the only part of his body not frozen in ice, and then pulls his hair. Many have noted Trump’s absence of empathy–for country as well as for people–which is captured by this frozen state.

As I noted in yesterday’s post, if Trump were the least little bit remorseful for his failings, in Dante’s eyes he would qualify for Purgatory, where he could work on purging them. Though an old man, he still has time.

I wouldn’t hold my breath, however.  

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Trump & Inferno’s 9 Circles–Pick One

Gustave Doré, 5th Circle of Dante’s Inferno (the Wrathful)

Tuesday

Since my Representative Masterpieces class has been immersed in Dante’s Inferno recently, I’ve been giving a lot of thought to how people end up in hell. I’ve never liked condemning people to the nether regions, partly because I’ve always taken to heart Jesus’s admonition to “judge not lest ye be judged.” If I were to start assigning people to Dante’s nine circles, I might start with those who gleefully condemn their enemies to hell. In short, it’s an exercise I don’t find all that useful.

Therefore, when I noted in a recent post that Donald Trump was eligible for seven of the nine Dante’s circles, I didn’t like how I was assuming the position of righteous judge.

Dante, however, is doing more than engaging in revenge fantasies. Scholars point out that the punishments endured by his sinners are metaphorical expressions of the torments their sins put them through. In other words, Dante just gives us graphic depictions of the hellish lives they are already living. The punishments are eternal because the individuals have lost the ability to imagine anything else. As William Franke puts it

Through persistent sin, free will is eventually lost…Free indulgence becomes habit and eventually results in loss of the ability not to sin. What we once chose freely becomes addiction, compulsion, necessity: we become it. Eventually we no longer know how to understand ourselves otherwise than in terms of the sin–or more precisely, of the self-interpretation that a certain sin entails. We die morally, and at that point it is too late to change.

As I look at Trump, I find myself wondering whether he is capable of reforming. Or is he, like Dante’s sinners, permanently trapped within a hellish state.

Contrition, prayer, and repentance (to quote Dr. Faustus’s Good Angel) are what separate those who go to Dante’s Purgatory from those who go to his Hell. In other words, the former are capable of seeing themselves through the lens of divine goodness and, horrified by what they witness, they desire to atone. Does Trump ever look within and have second thoughts?

Consider how Dante would handle someone who has  boasted of grabbing women “by the pussy,” who has been accused by multiple women of sexual harassment and/or sexual assault, and who has been unfaithful in all three of his wives. Could such a man ever understand that a committed relationship with a soulmate is far more fulfilling than perpetual promiscuity? Or does his internal world look something like Dante’s second circle of hell:

I came to a place stripped bare of every light
and roaring on the naked dark like seas
wracked by a war of winds. Their hellish flight

of storm and counterstorm through time foregone,
sweeps the souls of the damned before its charge
Whirling and battering it drives them on…

God hasn’t condemned the lustful to this world. They have chosen it themselves.

A mere glimpse of a soulful relationship, however, would be enough to land them in Dante’s Purgatory, and this glimpse can even occur on one’s deathbed. In Canto III Dante depicts people who repented at the last minute and were so appalled at how they saw themselves that they wanted to change. To cite a literary example, the narcissistic and destructive King Lear, who experiences real love only in the last hours of his life, would be placed in this level, where he would devote all his energies to spending eternity with Cordelia. If Lear had not had this glimpse, he would probably end up in the fifth circle of Inferno, where those enmired in wrath find a home.

So while cautioning against judgment that should be in the hands of a higher power, here are the levels of Inferno that Trump appears to be headed for if he doesn’t look inward and strive for change:

Lust (Circle 2)—See above

Gluttony (Circle 3) – The gluttonous are stuck in muck and are battered constantly by cold and dirty hail, rain, and snow, which is not a bad account of what bad eating does to our bodies.

Waste and Hoarding (Circle 4) – I’ve applied this level to those who exacerbate income inequality (here). Trump, who prefers to use “other people’s money,” steals from his charity and stiffs contractors while spending lavishly on himself, is both a hoarder and a waster. In Inferno, these figures spend all their energy pushing large boulders against each other, a powerful articulation of the meaningless time and effort people commit to such activities.

Wrath (Circle 5)—The president, like Dante’s sinners, appears perpetually stuck in wrathful slime, continually seeking enemies to attack:

Beyond its rocky race and wild descent
the river floods and forms a marsh called Styx,
a dreary swampland, vaporous and malignant.

And I, intent on all our passage touched,
made out a swarm of spirits in that bog
savage with anger, naked, slime-besmutched.

They thumped at one another in that slime
with hands and feet, and they butted, and they bit
as if each would tear the other limb from limb.

Sloth (Circle 5)—The slothful are in the same swampland only they are below the surface so that Dante can only see bubbles emanating from their speech. His guide Virgil translates their words for him. Think of them as the president rage tweeting as he watches hours and hours of television:

And my kind Sage [Virgil]: “My son, behold the souls
of those who lived in wrath. And do you see
the broken surfaces on those water-holes

on every hand, boiling as if in pain?
There are souls beneath that water. Fixed in slime
they speak their piece, end it, and start again:

‘Sullen were we in the air made sweet by the Sun;
in the glory of his shining our hearts poured
a bitter smoke. Sullen were we gegun;

sullen we lie forever in this ditch.’
This litany they gargle in their throats
as if they sang, but lacked the words and pitch.'"

Heresy (Circle 6) – Trump appears to be heretical because, other than a belief in Norman Vincent Peale’s prosperity theology, he is a materialist. Dante captures how the heretics are cut off from any vision of transcendence by enclosing them in iron boxes that no light can penetrate.

The seventh circle of Inferno is where the violent and the bestial reside. This circle is divided into descending rounds:

Violence against Neighbors (Circle 7, Round 1)—It is to Trump’s credit that, as commander in chief, he has not entered further into this realm. Other than targeted assassinations here and support of autocrats committing atrocities there, he may not deserve to join Alexander, Attila, and others who are engulfed in a river of boiling blood.

Blasphemy (Circle 7, Round 3)—There’s no doubt that Dante would see Trump as blasphemous, especially in his campaign assertion that “he does not regret never asking God for forgiveness, partially because he says he doesn’t have much to apologize for.”

Not even God, in Trump’s mind, can judge him. In Inferno, violence against God is captured by Capaneus, who lies supine upon hot sands while fiery rain descends from above. As Virgil describes the condition,

O Capaneus, by your insolence

you are made to suffer as much fire inside
as falls upon you. Only your own rage
could be fit torment for your sullen pride.

As well as this seems to capture Trump’s perpetual rage, the last two circles (Fraudulence and Malice) may be even a better fit. I’ll save those for tomorrow.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Mrs. Dalloway as Pandemic Novel?!

Streep as a character inspired by Clarissa Dalloway

Monday

Sometimes it takes a crisis to see the crisis lying behind a revered masterpiece. An enlightening New Yorker article argues that the 1918 Spanish flu shaped Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway (1925), even though the novel has only a couple of oblique references to the pandemic that killed 50 to 100 million people world-wide.

The idea came to Evan Kindley after he noticed allusions to the novel’s famous opening line cropping up on twitter. The line “Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself,” he notes, sets in motion “the most ecstatic representation of running errands in the Western canon.” One can chart the progress of our response to Covid-19 by the twitter references:

March 16th: “mrs. dalloway said she would disinfect the doorknobs herself.” March 19th: “Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the sanitizer herself.” March 23rd: “Mrs. Dalloway said she would catch the virus herself.” (That one accompanied a photo of a crowded flower market in East London.) March 24th: “Mrs. Dalloway said she would scroll through pictures of flowers herself.” March 31st: “Mrs. Dalloway said she would have the flowers delivered because they were [a] non-essential need, but she would make sure to tip the delivery guy at least 30% herself.” April 3rd: “Mrs. Dalloway said she would order from @Instacart herself.” April 5th: “Mrs. Dalloway said she would make the mask herself.”

In normal times, of course, running errands is barely worthy of notice. It takes the cabin fever of Covid confinement to transform them into ecstatic experiences. Here’s Mrs. Dalloway in those early pages:

Such fools we are, she thought, crossing Victoria Street. For Heaven only knows why one loves it so [going out in the London streets], how one sees it so, making it up, building it round one, tumbling it, creating it every moment afresh; but the veriest frumps, the most dejected of miseries sitting on doorsteps (drink their downfall) do the same; can’t be dealt with, she felt positive, by Acts of Parliament for that very reason: they love life. In people’s eyes, in the swing, tramp, and trudge; in the bellow and the uproar; the carriages, motor cars, omnibuses, vans, sandwich men shuffling and swinging; brass bands; barrel organs; in the triumph and the jingle and the strange high singing of some aeroplane overhead was what she loved; life; London; this moment of June.

Kindley informs us that the novel’s few elliptical allusions to the flu—Clarissa has “grown very white since her illness”; her heart may have been “affected, they said, by influenza”—hide Woolf’s significant experiences with the illness:

Her mother died of heart failure brought on by influenza in 1895, a tragedy that precipitated the first of Woolf’s many nervous breakdowns. Woolf herself came down with serious cases of the disease a half-dozen times between 1916 and 1925, and needed to remain confined to bed for significant stretches. Influenza affected her heart, just as it did Clarissa’s, and may have played a role in her worsening mental health during this period, as well. 

Woolf expressed surprise at how few novelists tackled the topic, and Kindley notes the pandemic shows up less in literature and culture than one would have expected. Part of the reason, he speculates, is that it was overshadowed by World War I; partly because it was not as heroic to die of the flu as to die in battle (in fact, it was almost seen as unpatriotic); and partly because female deaths didn’t draw the attention male deaths did.

In a recent interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, a historian of America’s 1918 influenza outbreak is also surprised but posits that the Jazz Age was a reaction to the epidemic, a wild, carpe diem plunge into life following humanity’s bout with death. In that case, people may have been so determined to put the epidemic behind them that they engaged in an act of collective forgetting.

Whatever the reasons, we are now in a position to better understand why Mrs. Dalloway would embrace small and intense moments of being. It also explains why, prior to her plunge, she experiences a momentary dread: “[S]he always had the feeling that it was very, very dangerous to live even one day.” I could well imagine having the same mixed feelings, say about attending a sporting event or a show, if ever we are fortunate to return to normal life.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Carrying a Candle against the Wind

Joseph the Carpenter

Spiritual Sunday

I love this simple Wendell Berry poem, which functions as a prayer. I pair it up with a favorite painting of mine that gets at the intimate relationship between a father and a son. The loving bond between Joseph and Jesus so moved me as a young father that I framed it and put in my son Darien’s room.  Darien in turn has put it my grandson Alban’s room.

Love keeps the candle alight in the face of the wind.

I know that I have life
only insofar as I have love.

I have no love
except it come from Thee.

Help me, please, to carry
this candle against the wind.

(from This Day: Sabbath Poems Collected & New, 1979-2013, Berkeley: Counterpoint, 2013)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments closed

Battling Proud, Wayward Squirrels

Beatrix Potter, Squirrel Nutkin

Friday

Thanks to Covid-19, I’ve now spent more time watching squirrels than at any time of my life. We hung two bird feeders over our deck and have been involved in a non-stop war with squirrels ever since. It’s like an elaborate chess game: they offer a counter move to each of our own.

Apparently John Blades has written a novel (Small Game) in which squirrels appear as demon figures of havoc and discord. According to the Guardian article where I learned about the book, Blades draws on the malicious trickster Ratatoskr in Norse mythology to depict them. That sounds about right.

When I hung a cylindrical feeder off poles attached to the deck railing, the squirrels were somehow able to shimmy up the poles and drape themselves down, hugging the cylinders as they calmly munched. Entwining barbed wire over the poles didn’t deter them. Nor did a cone. And when I hung a box feeder from a wire, somehow the squirrels leaped from a nearby table and got their claws into the ironwork—and then again, calmly munched.

Meanwhile, launching themselves towards a cylindrical feeder from the same wire managed to shake loose the s-hook from which the whole apparatus hung. They moved in on the scattered loot.

I imagine them as Squirrel Nutkin from the Beatrix Potter book and experience their blatant foraging as the owl Old Brown experiences Nutkin’s taunts. Eventually Old Brown grabs the squirrel and Nutkin is lucky to escape with half a tail. I’m not as lethal but no less irritated.

Yet I’m simultaneously impressed. It’s remarkable how squirrels can leap from a tree and catch the slenderest of branches on their way through the forest. Both their toes and their tails are marvels. I would never want to squirrel-proof my feeder too thoroughly as I would miss out on their daring gymnastics.

Yeats is similarly impressed and uses acrobatic squirrels to criticize a calcified government.  No authority, someone with “tame will,” “timid brain,” and knitted brow, could ever breed “that fierce tooth and cleanly [habitually clean] limb,” he writes. This “proud, wayward squirrel” laughs upon the bough and delights in bounding from limb to limb. Is the squirrel here a stand-in for the rebellious poet?

“No government appointed him,” Yeats informs us. So does that make me a colorless functionary as I try to limit our bird feeders to birds?

An Appointment

Being out of heart with government
I took a broken root to fling
Where the proud, wayward squirrel went,
Taking delight that he could spring;
And he, with that low whinnying sound
That is like laughter, sprang again
And so to the other tree at a bound.
Nor the tame will, nor timid brain,
Nor heavy knitting of the brow
Bred that fierce tooth and cleanly limb
And threw him up to laugh on the bough;
No government appointed him.

Further information: For those interested, our sunflower seeds are currently attracting goldfinches, cardinals, phoebes, Carolina wrens, titmice, nuthatches, and chickadees. The last four are also drawn to our suet cage, which in addition pulls in four kinds of woodpecker: downy, hairy, and red-bellied woodpeckers and, until recently, yellow bellied sapsuckers.

Another squirrel poem: For a delightful autumn poem about squirrels, check out my father’s “The Hickory Trees and the Squirrels.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments closed

Empty Yourself, Taste Sweetness

Thursday

The holy month of Ramadan begins today so here’s a Rumi poem on fasting that 1.8 billion people will be undertaking. The purpose of fasting, as an Islamic website informs me, is

to develop the quality of righteousness, inwardly and outwardly, by abstaining from sinful deeds and training ourselves to control our thoughts and desires. Fasting is a deeply spiritual practice that is meant to benefit us in body, mind, and heart.

In Rumi’s Ramadan poem, he talks of being immersed in busyness the way a chick “frets within the egg…eating and choaking.” With fasting, we break free and fly. Though the lips are parched and the belly empty, the mind focuses on what is important:

The lips of the Master are parched
from calling the Beloved.
The sound of your call resounds
through the horn of your empty belly.

When we empty ourselves, we are like the reed through which music is played. Or we are like Mary, who opened herself to the Holy Spirit and gave birth to Jesus.

O moon-faced Beloved,
the month of Ramadan has arrived
Cover the table
and open the path of praise.

O fickle busybody,
it’s time to change your ways.
Can you see the one who’s selling the halvah
how long will it be the halvah you desire?

Just a glimpse of the halvah-maker
has made you so sweet even honey says,
“I’ll put myself beneath your feet, like soil;
I’ll worship at your shrine.”

Your chick frets within the egg
with all your eating and choking.
Break out of your shell that your wings may grow.
Let yourself fly.

The lips of the Master are parched
from calling the Beloved.
The sound of your call resounds
through the horn of your empty belly.

Let nothing be inside of you.
Be empty:  give your lips to the lips of the reed.
When like a reed you fill with His breath,
then you’ll taste sweetness.

Sweetness is hidden in the Breath
that fills the reed.
Be like Mary – by that sweet breath
a child grew within her.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments closed

Manifesto for the Earth’s Future

Yosemite National Park

Wednesday – Earth Day, 50th Anniversary

I remember well my first Earth Day. Fifty years ago, as a freshman at Carleton College, I wrote the Carletonian article on the outdoor workshops that faculty and students conducted for area school kids. I still remember a naturalist asking the children how there could be teeth marks so high on the trees. The answer: the animals would have been elevated by several feet of snow.

With the Trump administration’s all-out assault on the environment, Earth Day is more important than ever. Wendell Berry’s “Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front” (1973) is written very much in the spirit of the 1960s resistance movements. Berry calls for us to think beyond “quick profit” and to work towards a future beyond ourselves. Deliberately using the language of the stock market, he advises, “Invest in the millennium. Plant sequoias.”

When he wrote the poem, Berry could not have imagined the extent to which people would one day be able to predict the motions of our minds. Nevertheless, he sees the trend line and calls for independent thinking.  “As soon as the generals and the politicos can predict the motions of your mind, lose it,” he tells us, and then, “Be like the fox who makes more tracks than necessary, some in the wrong direction.”

As for his advice to “practice resurrection”? If we connect with the earth, we will become one with its cycles. Spring will follow winter.

Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front
By Wendell Berry

Love the quick profit, the annual raise, vacation with pay.
Want more of everything ready-made.
Be afraid to know your neighbors and to die.
And you will have a window in your head.
Not even your future will be a mystery anymore.
Your mind will be punched in a card and shut away in a little drawer.
When they want you to buy something they will call you.
When they want you to die for profit they will let you know.
So, friends, every day do something that won’t compute.
Love the Lord. Love the world. Work for nothing.
Take all that you have and be poor.
Love someone who does not deserve it.
Denounce the government and embrace the flag.
Hope to live in that free republic for which it stands.
Give your approval to all you cannot understand.
Praise ignorance, for what man
has not encountered he has not destroyed.
Ask the questions that have no answers.
Invest in the millennium.
Plant sequoias.
Say that your main crop is the forest that you did not plant,
that you will not live to harvest.

Say that the leaves are harvested when they have rotted into the mold.
Call that profit. Prophesy such returns.
Put your faith in the two inches of humus that will build under the trees
every thousand years.
Listen to carrion–put your ear close,
and hear the faint chattering of the songs that are to come.
Expect the end of the world.
Laugh. Laughter is immeasurable.
Be joyful though you have considered all the facts.
So long as women do not go cheap
for power, please women more than men.
Ask yourself: Will this satisfy a woman satisfied to bear a child?
Will this disturb the sleep of a woman near to giving birth?
Go with your love to the fields. Lie easy in the shade.
Rest your head in her lap.
Swear allegiance to what is nighest your thoughts.
As soon as the generals and the politicos can predict the motions
of your mind, lose it.
Leave it as a sign to mark a false trail, the way you didn’t go.
Be like the fox who makes more tracks than necessary,
some in the wrong direction.
Practice resurrection.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Sci-Fi Provides Pandemic Guidance

Still from Frankenstein (1931)

Tuesday

In yesterday’s post I observed that pandemic literature changed with the scientific revolution, which challenged religious ways of processing pandemics. It’s interesting, then, to see two contrary ways that pandemic novels view scientists. In a work like Michael Crichton’s Andromeda Strain (1969), scientists are the heroes, courageously attempting to prevent a deadly virus from escaping a laboratory and infecting the world. In works like Stephen King’s The Stand and Margaret Atwood’s Oryk and Crake, on the other hand, scientists take down the world’s population.

We see both suspicion and applause at work in today’s crisis. Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is demonized by some on the right and regarded as a national treasure by pretty much everyone else. It turns out that such ambivalence is at the heart of science fiction.

The ultimate example is the work that can be said to have launched the genre: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1823). The protagonist, while brilliant and inspiring, believes it is permissible to play God. Disaster ensues.

I mention as an aside that Shelley would go on to the write a novel about a killer pandemic, The Last Man (1826), in which everyone dies of a world-wide plague except for one man, who becomes a wanderer. This particular work may have set the stage for such novels as Jack London’s The Scarlet Plague (1915) and George R. Stewart’s Earth Abides (1949), in which individuals try to start the world anew. (Thanks to Vanderbilt librarian Valerie Hotchkiss for putting me on to these.) More recently, there’s Emily St. John Mandel’s Station Eleven (2014), which I have written on here and here.

For all our fear of scientists losing their ethical bearings, we rely on them when a pandemic breaks out. Or, for that matter, when we find ourselves in a hospital ICU. For all of Donald Trump’s resentment at health experts telling him what to do—a resentment that led him to cut funding for the National Institute for Health, the Center for Disease Control, and groups researching global pandemics—he also dreams of a miracle medicine that will make Covid-19 go away. Who does he think comes up with such cures?

We get at the source of public suspicion in The Stand and Oryk and Crake. There we see science weaponized and, as in Frankenstein, the scientific breakthrough rebounding upon the inventor. In The Stand, a biological weapons lab has created a killer strain of the flu, which then escapes its containment. A worker at the facility, rather than selflessly sacrificing his life, panics and flees, thereby taking down the whole world. In King’s vision of humanity, evil impulses prompt us to devise such weapons in the first place.

Atwood’s vision is more complex. Thanks to the growing power of corporations, along with their bought politicians who strip away all regulations, gene technology is running amok. Exotic new animals are engineered, including pigs with internal organs available for human transplant and sheep with fleece that can be used for human hair. There are also wolfogs—guard dogs that will rip your throat out—and liobams, engineered by a fundamentalist sect that dreams of the day when the lion will lie down with the lamb.

In this world, pharmaceutical companies operate in a laissez-faire manner, sometimes unleashing viruses for which only they have the cure. Crake, a genius genetic engineer, is so disgusted by developments that he deliberately releases an illness, contained in an irresistible pleasure drug, that wipes out practically the entire human race. He also engineers an environmentally-sensitive human species to take our place.

Not all humans die, however, and, like Noah’s flood, this “waterless flood” doesn’t eradicate human evil. Several are back to their old evil ways by the trilogy’s end. So much for technological fixes.

Suspicion of science gone awry lies behind the anti-Vaxxer movement and, for that matter, attacks on Dr. Fauci. So that they can behave ethically and and communicate effectively, we need our scientists taking literature, philosophy, history and religion courses. The various Faust/Faustus stories show us only too clearly what happens when they make diabolic bargains and focus solely on the power unleashed by knowledge.

To that end, every scientist should read Frankenstein. The best science fiction has always worked as a “what-if” thought exercise, melding a profound understanding of human beings with the latest scientific and technological developments. Even when the science becomes outdated, as it has with Shelley’s work, the warnings are as prescient as ever.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed